Membrane aerated biological reactors (MABRs) to enhance the biological treatment process at a WWTP

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122921
{"title":"Membrane aerated biological reactors (MABRs) to enhance the biological treatment process at a WWTP","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The goal of climate neutrality, under the provision of the European Green Deal, will require great efforts to wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) to reduce and optimize their energy consumption. The utilization of membrane aerated biological reactors (MABRs) to renovate existing WWTPs could be an opportunity in this sense. In this study, the control of the flow at the outlet of a pure, open-end MABR was used as a strategy to minimize the oxygen consumption and obtain high oxygen transfer efficiencies (OTEs). OTE values of more than 80% were observed, which are not so common in the literature and are comparable to those obtained with a close-end configuration. High efficiencies (85%) were found for the removal of both COD and total nitrogen from samples of real wastewater. A techno-economic analysis, comparing a conventional activate sludge (CAS) plant with a MABR, both with a treatment capacity of 25,000 equivalent inhabitants (e.i.), found that the MABR only needed approx. 1/5 of the energy required by the CAS. A MABR plant could become a profitable investment, under a fixed return time of 5 years, compared to a CAS with a CAPEX of 123.7 k€, if the overall cost of the cassettes was inferior to 237 k€. A sensitivity analysis imposing a variation of ±50% on the input parameters (cost of blower, diffusers, electric energy, and opportunity cost of capital) demonstrated that the cost of electric energy had the highest impact on the maximum allowable value of the MABR investment, which was affected by ± 26% with respect to the value calculated in the reference scenario.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479724029074","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of climate neutrality, under the provision of the European Green Deal, will require great efforts to wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) to reduce and optimize their energy consumption. The utilization of membrane aerated biological reactors (MABRs) to renovate existing WWTPs could be an opportunity in this sense. In this study, the control of the flow at the outlet of a pure, open-end MABR was used as a strategy to minimize the oxygen consumption and obtain high oxygen transfer efficiencies (OTEs). OTE values of more than 80% were observed, which are not so common in the literature and are comparable to those obtained with a close-end configuration. High efficiencies (85%) were found for the removal of both COD and total nitrogen from samples of real wastewater. A techno-economic analysis, comparing a conventional activate sludge (CAS) plant with a MABR, both with a treatment capacity of 25,000 equivalent inhabitants (e.i.), found that the MABR only needed approx. 1/5 of the energy required by the CAS. A MABR plant could become a profitable investment, under a fixed return time of 5 years, compared to a CAS with a CAPEX of 123.7 k€, if the overall cost of the cassettes was inferior to 237 k€. A sensitivity analysis imposing a variation of ±50% on the input parameters (cost of blower, diffusers, electric energy, and opportunity cost of capital) demonstrated that the cost of electric energy had the highest impact on the maximum allowable value of the MABR investment, which was affected by ± 26% with respect to the value calculated in the reference scenario.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膜充气生物反应器 (MABR),用于加强污水处理厂的生物处理工艺。
根据 "欧洲绿色协议 "的规定,要实现气候中和的目标,污水处理厂(WWTPs)就必须努力减少和优化能源消耗。从这个意义上讲,利用膜充气生物反应器(MABRs)改造现有的污水处理厂可能是一个机会。在这项研究中,控制纯净的开口式膜充气生物反应器出口处的流量被用作一种策略,以最大限度地减少耗氧量并获得高氧传输效率(OTE)。观察到的 OTE 值超过 80%,这在文献中并不常见,与闭端配置获得的 OTE 值相当。从实际废水样本中去除 COD 和总氮的效率也很高(85%)。一项技术经济分析比较了传统活性污泥(CAS)处理厂和人与生物反应器(MABR)处理厂(处理能力均为 25,000 人当量),结果发现人与生物反应器所需的能源仅为传统活性污泥(CAS)处理厂的约 1/5。与资本支出为 123.7 千欧元的 CAS 相比,如果纸盒的总成本低于 237 千欧元,那么在 5 年的固定回报时间内,MABR 设备的投资是有利可图的。对输入参数(鼓风机成本、扩散器成本、电能成本和资本机会成本)进行±50%的敏感性分析表明,电能成本对人与生物圈反应器投资的最大允许值影响最大,与参考方案中计算出的值相比,影响幅度为±26%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Ammonia-stressed anaerobic digestion: Sensitivity dynamics of key syntrophic interactions and methanogenic pathways-A review Bioconversion of sulfamethazine-contaminated chicken manure by black soldier fly larvae: Effects on antibiotic resistance genes and microbial communities Understanding the impact of environmental, social, and governance incidents on food producing corporations The collaboration and competition between indigenous microorganisms and exogenous anaerobic digester sludge in anaerobic treatment of pickled mustard wastewater at different salinities The disparities in health risks of multiple pollutants through soil and dietary exposure in a rural-urban area based on accessibility method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1