Aliénor Vienne-Jumeau, Dominique Bremond-Gignac, Matthieu P Robert
{"title":"Association of optic disc drusen and small scleral canals - A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Aliénor Vienne-Jumeau, Dominique Bremond-Gignac, Matthieu P Robert","doi":"10.1038/s41433-024-03451-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pathophysiology of optic disc drusen (ODD) has long been discussed. According to one leading theory, they develop from calcified mitochondria extruded from axons compressed by an unusually small scleral canal. To examine this hypothesis, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the scleral canal size in patients with ODD (PO) in comparison to healthy subjects (HS). We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, EMBASE and gray literature to identify relevant articles. A subgroup analysis compared patients with buried ODD (PO<sub>b</sub>) and patients with visible ODD (PO<sub>v</sub>). The study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews on December 9th, 2022 (Registration: CRD42022375110). We included fifteen articles in the review and fourteen in the meta-analysis. The mean diameter of the scleral canal computed using both fundus photography (D<sub>F</sub>) and spectral-domain with enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (D<sub>O-EDI</sub>) was significantly smaller in PO compared to HS (standardized mean difference -1.21 [-1.85 to -0.56] and -0.66 [-0.94 to -0.37] respectively). D<sub>O-EDI</sub>, but not D<sub>F</sub>, was higher in PO<sub>v</sub> as compared to PO<sub>b</sub>. When including all-generation OCT in the analysis, the difference between PO<sub>v</sub> and PO<sub>b</sub>, but not between PO and HS, remained. Several intertwined hypotheses can explain these subgroup and sensitivity results: an enlargement of the canal as the ODD grow, an enlargement with time, or a measurement bias (artefactual enlargement of the canal due to a posterior shadow on OCT). In conclusion, this review and meta-analysis further supports the role of a small scleral canal in the development of ODD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12125,"journal":{"name":"Eye","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03451-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The pathophysiology of optic disc drusen (ODD) has long been discussed. According to one leading theory, they develop from calcified mitochondria extruded from axons compressed by an unusually small scleral canal. To examine this hypothesis, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the scleral canal size in patients with ODD (PO) in comparison to healthy subjects (HS). We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, EMBASE and gray literature to identify relevant articles. A subgroup analysis compared patients with buried ODD (POb) and patients with visible ODD (POv). The study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews on December 9th, 2022 (Registration: CRD42022375110). We included fifteen articles in the review and fourteen in the meta-analysis. The mean diameter of the scleral canal computed using both fundus photography (DF) and spectral-domain with enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (DO-EDI) was significantly smaller in PO compared to HS (standardized mean difference -1.21 [-1.85 to -0.56] and -0.66 [-0.94 to -0.37] respectively). DO-EDI, but not DF, was higher in POv as compared to POb. When including all-generation OCT in the analysis, the difference between POv and POb, but not between PO and HS, remained. Several intertwined hypotheses can explain these subgroup and sensitivity results: an enlargement of the canal as the ODD grow, an enlargement with time, or a measurement bias (artefactual enlargement of the canal due to a posterior shadow on OCT). In conclusion, this review and meta-analysis further supports the role of a small scleral canal in the development of ODD.
期刊介绍:
Eye seeks to provide the international practising ophthalmologist with high quality articles, of academic rigour, on the latest global clinical and laboratory based research. Its core aim is to advance the science and practice of ophthalmology with the latest clinical- and scientific-based research. Whilst principally aimed at the practising clinician, the journal contains material of interest to a wider readership including optometrists, orthoptists, other health care professionals and research workers in all aspects of the field of visual science worldwide. Eye is the official journal of The Royal College of Ophthalmologists.
Eye encourages the submission of original articles covering all aspects of ophthalmology including: external eye disease; oculo-plastic surgery; orbital and lacrimal disease; ocular surface and corneal disorders; paediatric ophthalmology and strabismus; glaucoma; medical and surgical retina; neuro-ophthalmology; cataract and refractive surgery; ocular oncology; ophthalmic pathology; ophthalmic genetics.