Improving the assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction by including left atrial strain in the algorithm: LA Strain and LV diastolic dysfunction assessment.

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiac Failure Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.08.064
Lin Wang, Jonathan Weber, Jason Craft, Michael Passick, Omar K Khalique, Ziad A Ali, Jae K Oh, J Jane Cao
{"title":"Improving the assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction by including left atrial strain in the algorithm: LA Strain and LV diastolic dysfunction assessment.","authors":"Lin Wang, Jonathan Weber, Jason Craft, Michael Passick, Omar K Khalique, Ziad A Ali, Jae K Oh, J Jane Cao","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.08.064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The latest guidelines on echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) leave a significant proportion of patients with LVDD status undetermined. We aimed to examine the implication of an alternative algorithm incorporating left atrial (LA) strain as a tiebreaker on the indeterminate LVDD category.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We included 823 patients who underwent echocardiography and cardiac MRI within 7 days. LVDD was assessed by echocardiography following contemporary guidelines and an alternative algorithm including LA reservoir strain as a tie-breaker. LVDD was examined for its association with LV myocardial scar burden by cardiac MRI, and a composite outcome. 275 (33%) patients had LVDD, of whom 119 had advanced grades of LVDD (grade II-III), and 117 (14%) had indeterminate LVDD grade. When LA strain was applied at cut points of 18%, 24% and 35%, subjects were reclassified as normal or LVDD dependent accordingly. Reclassification allowed a similar outcome risk-stratification as the current guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LA reservoir strain improved LVDD assessment by eliminating indeterminate status/grade while maintaining the same effective outcome stratification as current guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.08.064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The latest guidelines on echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) leave a significant proportion of patients with LVDD status undetermined. We aimed to examine the implication of an alternative algorithm incorporating left atrial (LA) strain as a tiebreaker on the indeterminate LVDD category.

Methods and results: We included 823 patients who underwent echocardiography and cardiac MRI within 7 days. LVDD was assessed by echocardiography following contemporary guidelines and an alternative algorithm including LA reservoir strain as a tie-breaker. LVDD was examined for its association with LV myocardial scar burden by cardiac MRI, and a composite outcome. 275 (33%) patients had LVDD, of whom 119 had advanced grades of LVDD (grade II-III), and 117 (14%) had indeterminate LVDD grade. When LA strain was applied at cut points of 18%, 24% and 35%, subjects were reclassified as normal or LVDD dependent accordingly. Reclassification allowed a similar outcome risk-stratification as the current guidelines.

Conclusions: LA reservoir strain improved LVDD assessment by eliminating indeterminate status/grade while maintaining the same effective outcome stratification as current guidelines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将左心房应变纳入算法,改进左心室舒张功能障碍的评估:LA 应变和左心室舒张功能障碍评估。
背景:最新的左心室舒张功能障碍(LVDD)超声心动图评估指南使相当一部分患者的 LVDD 状态未确定。我们旨在研究将左心房(LA)应变作为不确定 LVDD 类别的决定因素的替代算法的影响:我们纳入了 823 名在 7 天内接受超声心动图和心脏磁共振成像检查的患者。超声心动图评估 LVDD 时遵循了当代指南和一种替代算法,其中包括将 LA 储层应变作为平局判定标准。通过心脏磁共振成像检查 LVDD 与左心室心肌瘢痕负担的关系,并得出综合结果。275例(33%)患者患有LVDD,其中119例为晚期LVDD(II-III级),117例(14%)LVDD等级不确定。当 LA 应变的切点为 18%、24% 和 35% 时,受试者会相应地被重新分类为正常或依赖 LVDD。重新分类后的结果风险分级与现行指南相似:结论:LA 储库应变通过消除不确定状态/等级,改善了 LVDD 评估,同时保持了与现行指南相同的有效结果分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Journal of Cardiac Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
653
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.
期刊最新文献
ExCITe: A Narrative Review of Motivating Factors for Residency and Fellowship Selection to Provide Insights Regarding the Waning Interest in Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology Training. Suboptimal Titration of Heart Failure Medications in Pediatric Patients: Baseline Data from ACTION. Post-Discharge Self-Care Confidence and Performance Levels in Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients. Prognostic utility and cutoff differences of NT-proBNP level across subgroups in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Insights from the PURSUIT-HFpEF Registry. Psychosocial Risk to Predict Outcomes after LVAD implantation: A small step forward in predicting human behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1