Role of osimertinib plus brain radiotherapy versus osimertinib single therapy in EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer with brain metastases: A meta-analysis and systematic review

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Critical reviews in oncology/hematology Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104540
Alessandro Nepote , Stefano Poletto , Valentina Bertaglia , Simona Carnio , Carlo Piumatti , Cristina Lanzetta , Ornella Cantale , Giorgio Saba , Paolo Bironzo , Silvia Novello , Antonino Carmelo Tralongo
{"title":"Role of osimertinib plus brain radiotherapy versus osimertinib single therapy in EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer with brain metastases: A meta-analysis and systematic review","authors":"Alessandro Nepote ,&nbsp;Stefano Poletto ,&nbsp;Valentina Bertaglia ,&nbsp;Simona Carnio ,&nbsp;Carlo Piumatti ,&nbsp;Cristina Lanzetta ,&nbsp;Ornella Cantale ,&nbsp;Giorgio Saba ,&nbsp;Paolo Bironzo ,&nbsp;Silvia Novello ,&nbsp;Antonino Carmelo Tralongo","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Single-agent osimertinib has improved outcomes in EGFR-mutated lung cancer patients with brain metastases (BMs), but still, 40 % of them will experience an intracranial progression. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the role of brain radiotherapy upfront plus osimertinib. We evaluated articles comparing the use of osimertinib versus osimertinib plus brain radiotherapy. We included 897 patients from nine retrospective studies. Patients treated with combination therapy had an improvement in intracranial progression-free survival (HR 0.76; 95 % CI 0.61–0.94) and overall survival (HR 0.56; 95 % CI 0.36–0.87) with an acceptable safety profile. Osimertinib with upfront brain radiotherapy may be a suitable first-line treatment option for EGFR mutated patients with BMs at diagnosis. The main limitations of this analysis are the retrospective nature and the inability to control for a single variable of interest. Despite that, the combination of osimertinib and upfront brain radiotherapy is a treatment strategy that deserves further prospective trials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":"205 ","pages":"Article 104540"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104084282400283X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Single-agent osimertinib has improved outcomes in EGFR-mutated lung cancer patients with brain metastases (BMs), but still, 40 % of them will experience an intracranial progression. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the role of brain radiotherapy upfront plus osimertinib. We evaluated articles comparing the use of osimertinib versus osimertinib plus brain radiotherapy. We included 897 patients from nine retrospective studies. Patients treated with combination therapy had an improvement in intracranial progression-free survival (HR 0.76; 95 % CI 0.61–0.94) and overall survival (HR 0.56; 95 % CI 0.36–0.87) with an acceptable safety profile. Osimertinib with upfront brain radiotherapy may be a suitable first-line treatment option for EGFR mutated patients with BMs at diagnosis. The main limitations of this analysis are the retrospective nature and the inability to control for a single variable of interest. Despite that, the combination of osimertinib and upfront brain radiotherapy is a treatment strategy that deserves further prospective trials.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奥希替尼加脑放疗与奥希替尼单药治疗在表皮生长因子受体突变非小细胞肺癌脑转移中的作用:一项荟萃分析和系统综述。
单药奥希替尼改善了脑转移(BMs)的表皮生长因子受体突变肺癌患者的预后,但仍有40%的患者会出现颅内进展。我们进行了一项系统性综述,以评估前期脑放疗联合奥希替尼的作用。我们评估了比较使用奥希替尼与奥希替尼加脑放疗的文章。我们纳入了九项回顾性研究中的 897 名患者。接受联合治疗的患者颅内无进展生存期(HR 0.76;95% CI 0.61-0.94)和总生存期(HR 0.56;95% CI 0.36-0.87)均有所改善,且安全性可接受。奥希替尼联合前期脑放疗可能是EGFR突变患者确诊为骨髓瘤时的合适一线治疗方案。这项分析的主要局限性在于其回顾性和无法控制单一相关变量。尽管如此,奥希替尼和前期脑放疗的联合治疗策略仍值得进一步进行前瞻性试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
213
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology publishes scholarly, critical reviews in all fields of oncology and hematology written by experts from around the world. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology is the Official Journal of the European School of Oncology (ESO) and the International Society of Liquid Biopsy.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Erratum to “Unleashing precision: A review of targeted approaches in pleural mesothelioma” [Crit. Rev. Oncol./Hematol. 203C (2024) 104481] Corrigendum to “The emerging HER2 landscape in Colorectal Cancer: The key to unveil the future treatment algorithm?” [Crit. Rev. Oncol./Hematol. 204 (2024) 104515] Corrigendum to “Navigating the complexity of PI3K/AKT pathway in HER-2 negative breast cancer: Biomarkers and beyond” [Crit. Rev. Oncol./Hematol. 200C (2024) 104404] Corrigendum to “Prevalence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with antibody-drug conjugates in metastatic breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis” [Crit. Rev. Oncol./Hematol. 204 (2024) 104527]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1