The Need for a New Approach to MCI Readiness in the Era of Emergency Department and Hospital Crowding.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Security Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1089/hs.2024.0058
Sanjana Puri, Sarah Tsay, Scott A Goldberg, Jennifer Shearer, Joshua J Baugh, Eileen F Searle, Paul D Biddinger
{"title":"The Need for a New Approach to MCI Readiness in the Era of Emergency Department and Hospital Crowding.","authors":"Sanjana Puri, Sarah Tsay, Scott A Goldberg, Jennifer Shearer, Joshua J Baugh, Eileen F Searle, Paul D Biddinger","doi":"10.1089/hs.2024.0058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emergency department (ED) visit volumes have increased since 2007, with crowding in the United States reaching its highest levels in 2022. During this same period, mass casualty incidents (MCIs) have increased dramatically, both in frequency and severity, across the United States. Resuscitation of trauma patients is a time-sensitive process that requires immediate patient assessment by coordinated clinical teams in order to successfully diagnose and manage life-threatening injuries. To make resuscitation spaces immediately available for incoming patients, typical MCI plans call for rapidly relocating ED patients from their rooms into hallways or transferring them to open inpatient areas. With current levels of crowding, however, such alternate care spaces are often already in use and traditional MCI plans are increasingly unrealistic. With ED crowding worsening and the frequency of MCIs rising, there is a worrisome risk that EDs could fail in their efforts to save patients due to insufficient resources and spaces to meet the demands of critically injured patients. Hospitals must use innovative, novel response strategies to ensure sufficient patient care spaces in a short timeframe to save the most lives possible. In this commentary, we describe the use of buffer zones to help EDs mobilize an effective response to MCIs in the current context of severe hospital crowding.</p>","PeriodicalId":12955,"journal":{"name":"Health Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Security","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2024.0058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emergency department (ED) visit volumes have increased since 2007, with crowding in the United States reaching its highest levels in 2022. During this same period, mass casualty incidents (MCIs) have increased dramatically, both in frequency and severity, across the United States. Resuscitation of trauma patients is a time-sensitive process that requires immediate patient assessment by coordinated clinical teams in order to successfully diagnose and manage life-threatening injuries. To make resuscitation spaces immediately available for incoming patients, typical MCI plans call for rapidly relocating ED patients from their rooms into hallways or transferring them to open inpatient areas. With current levels of crowding, however, such alternate care spaces are often already in use and traditional MCI plans are increasingly unrealistic. With ED crowding worsening and the frequency of MCIs rising, there is a worrisome risk that EDs could fail in their efforts to save patients due to insufficient resources and spaces to meet the demands of critically injured patients. Hospitals must use innovative, novel response strategies to ensure sufficient patient care spaces in a short timeframe to save the most lives possible. In this commentary, we describe the use of buffer zones to help EDs mobilize an effective response to MCIs in the current context of severe hospital crowding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在急诊室和医院人满为患的时代,有必要采取新方法为 MCI 做好准备。
自 2007 年以来,急诊科(ED)的就诊量不断增加,到 2022 年,美国急诊科的拥挤程度达到最高水平。在同一时期,全美大规模伤亡事件(MCI)的发生频率和严重程度都急剧上升。创伤病人的复苏是一个时间敏感的过程,需要协调的临床团队立即对病人进行评估,以便成功诊断和处理危及生命的伤情。为使抢救空间能够立即用于接收病人,典型的 MCI 计划要求迅速将急诊室病人从病房转移到走廊,或将他们转移到开放的住院区。然而,就目前的拥挤程度而言,这些备用护理空间往往已经投入使用,传统的 MCI 计划越来越不现实。随着急诊室拥挤情况的恶化和 MCI 频率的上升,急诊室可能会因资源和空间不足而无法满足危重伤员的需求,从而导致抢救病人的努力失败,这种风险令人担忧。医院必须采用创新、新颖的应对策略,确保在短时间内提供足够的患者护理空间,以尽可能挽救更多生命。在这篇评论中,我们介绍了在当前医院严重拥挤的情况下,如何利用缓冲区来帮助急诊室有效应对 MCI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Security
Health Security PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Health Security is a peer-reviewed journal providing research and essential guidance for the protection of people’s health before and after epidemics or disasters and for ensuring that communities are resilient to major challenges. The Journal explores the issues posed by disease outbreaks and epidemics; natural disasters; biological, chemical, and nuclear accidents or deliberate threats; foodborne outbreaks; and other health emergencies. It offers important insight into how to develop the systems needed to meet these challenges. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, Health Security covers research, innovations, methods, challenges, and ethical and legal dilemmas facing scientific, military, and health organizations. The Journal is a key resource for practitioners in these fields, policymakers, scientific experts, and government officials.
期刊最新文献
The Need for a New Approach to MCI Readiness in the Era of Emergency Department and Hospital Crowding. Pandemic Exercises: Lessons for a New Era in Pandemic Preparedness. Advancing Systematic Change in the National Disaster Medical System (NDMS): Early Implementation of the US Department of Defense NDMS Pilot Program. Frontline Leadership: Nurses in Special Pathogens Preparedness and Response. The Importance of Networks and Relationships: Leveraging the Biocontainment Unit Leadership Workgroup for Special Pathogen Outbreak Response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1