{"title":"Editorial: Disentangling Early-Life Antibiotics and Infections as Risk Factors for the Development of Childhood IBD","authors":"Katherine L. Stone, Adam S. Faye","doi":"10.1111/apt.18374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As the global prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing, emphasis has been placed on identifying modifiable risk factors that can aid in prevention [<span>1</span>]. Early-life factors, including antibiotic use and the occurrence of infections, increase the risk of developing IBD [<span>2, 3</span>]. This has been demonstrated in several studies, including a large-scale population-based study in Denmark, which found that antibiotic use was associated with an 84% increase in the risk of developing IBD in childhood [<span>4</span>]. However, most of these studies were unable to disentangle whether this increased risk was attributable to underlying infection, the use of antibiotics or, potentially, both.</p><p>Marild et al. capitalised on using parent questionnaire data from two Scandinavian birth cohorts, assessing whether antibiotic exposure and/or infections in the first 3 years of life increased the risk of IBD [<span>5</span>]. They concluded that early-life antibiotic use, independent of infection frequency, was associated with an increased risk of developing IBD. Furthermore, there was no clear association between the number of childhood infections and the later development of IBD, although up to 20% of data were missing. This was similar to the findings by Oh et al., in which a dose-dependent association was seen between childhood antibiotic use and the development of IBD, independent of type of underlying infection [<span>6</span>].</p><p>Interestingly, however, Marild et al. noted differential findings when stratifying by antibiotic subtype. Penicillins (narrow and broad-spectrum) increased the risk of IBD when utilised within the first year of life; non-penicillin antibiotics increased the risk of IBD when used during the first 1–3 years of life. Although the significance of this remains uncertain, it does imply that antibiotic use may contribute to the development of IBD differently through the ages. We see evidence of this in prior studies, as individual classes of antibiotics posed differential risks for the development of IBD based on both an individual's chronological age as well as the antibiotic's potential impact on the intestinal microbiome [<span>7, 8</span>].</p><p>Additionally, although the link between antibiotic use and incident IBD has been uniformly demonstrated, the link between an underlying infection and the later development of IBD has not. This study, in contrast to prior data by Axelrad et al., demonstrated that frequency of infections in childhood may not be a significant risk factor for childhood IBD [<span>9</span>]. This may be due to the inclusion of milder infections, as these survey-based data do not rely on clinical codes which inherently exclude mild infections managed at home. To this end, when stratifying by severity of infection, Marild et al. did find that infections requiring hospitalisation were associated with a 35% increase in risk of IBD [<span>5</span>].</p><p>While this study centres on the first 3 years of life—a critical period for immune and microbiome development—future work must also account for exposures that continue to occur throughout life. This will deepen our understanding of long-term risk factors for developing IBD and pave the way for future preventive strategies.</p><p><b>Katherine L. Stone:</b> writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. <b>Adam S. Faye:</b> writing – original draft, writing – review and editing.</p><p>Katherine L. Stone declares no conflicts of interest. Adam S. Faye reports research Support from Crohn's and Colitis Foundation, American College of Gastroenterology and the NIH. Adam S. Faye has received consultant fees from Takeda, BMS and Abbvie.</p><p>This article is linked to Marild et al paper. To view this article, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18358.</p>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"61 2","pages":"384-385"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apt.18374","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.18374","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As the global prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing, emphasis has been placed on identifying modifiable risk factors that can aid in prevention [1]. Early-life factors, including antibiotic use and the occurrence of infections, increase the risk of developing IBD [2, 3]. This has been demonstrated in several studies, including a large-scale population-based study in Denmark, which found that antibiotic use was associated with an 84% increase in the risk of developing IBD in childhood [4]. However, most of these studies were unable to disentangle whether this increased risk was attributable to underlying infection, the use of antibiotics or, potentially, both.
Marild et al. capitalised on using parent questionnaire data from two Scandinavian birth cohorts, assessing whether antibiotic exposure and/or infections in the first 3 years of life increased the risk of IBD [5]. They concluded that early-life antibiotic use, independent of infection frequency, was associated with an increased risk of developing IBD. Furthermore, there was no clear association between the number of childhood infections and the later development of IBD, although up to 20% of data were missing. This was similar to the findings by Oh et al., in which a dose-dependent association was seen between childhood antibiotic use and the development of IBD, independent of type of underlying infection [6].
Interestingly, however, Marild et al. noted differential findings when stratifying by antibiotic subtype. Penicillins (narrow and broad-spectrum) increased the risk of IBD when utilised within the first year of life; non-penicillin antibiotics increased the risk of IBD when used during the first 1–3 years of life. Although the significance of this remains uncertain, it does imply that antibiotic use may contribute to the development of IBD differently through the ages. We see evidence of this in prior studies, as individual classes of antibiotics posed differential risks for the development of IBD based on both an individual's chronological age as well as the antibiotic's potential impact on the intestinal microbiome [7, 8].
Additionally, although the link between antibiotic use and incident IBD has been uniformly demonstrated, the link between an underlying infection and the later development of IBD has not. This study, in contrast to prior data by Axelrad et al., demonstrated that frequency of infections in childhood may not be a significant risk factor for childhood IBD [9]. This may be due to the inclusion of milder infections, as these survey-based data do not rely on clinical codes which inherently exclude mild infections managed at home. To this end, when stratifying by severity of infection, Marild et al. did find that infections requiring hospitalisation were associated with a 35% increase in risk of IBD [5].
While this study centres on the first 3 years of life—a critical period for immune and microbiome development—future work must also account for exposures that continue to occur throughout life. This will deepen our understanding of long-term risk factors for developing IBD and pave the way for future preventive strategies.
Katherine L. Stone: writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. Adam S. Faye: writing – original draft, writing – review and editing.
Katherine L. Stone declares no conflicts of interest. Adam S. Faye reports research Support from Crohn's and Colitis Foundation, American College of Gastroenterology and the NIH. Adam S. Faye has received consultant fees from Takeda, BMS and Abbvie.
This article is linked to Marild et al paper. To view this article, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18358.
随着全球炎症性肠病(IBD)患病率的增加,重点已放在确定可改变的危险因素,可以帮助预防IBD。早期生活因素,包括抗生素的使用和感染的发生,增加了发生IBD的风险[2,3]。这已在几项研究中得到证实,包括丹麦的一项大规模人群研究,该研究发现抗生素的使用与儿童期IBD发病风险增加84%相关。然而,这些研究中的大多数都无法弄清这种增加的风险是由于潜在感染、抗生素的使用还是两者兼而有之。Marild等人利用来自两个斯堪的纳维亚出生队列的父母问卷数据,评估生命前3年的抗生素暴露和/或感染是否会增加IBD bbb的风险。他们得出结论,生命早期使用抗生素与感染频率无关,与患IBD的风险增加有关。此外,尽管高达20%的数据缺失,但儿童感染数量与IBD的后期发展之间没有明确的关联。这与Oh等人的发现相似,他们发现儿童抗生素使用与IBD的发展之间存在剂量依赖关系,与潜在感染的类型无关。然而,有趣的是,Marild等人注意到按抗生素亚型分层时的差异结果。在生命的第一年使用青霉素(窄谱和广谱)会增加IBD的风险;在出生后1-3年内使用非青霉素类抗生素会增加患IBD的风险。尽管这一结果的意义仍不确定,但它确实意味着抗生素的使用可能会在不同年龄阶段对IBD的发展产生不同的影响。我们在先前的研究中看到了这方面的证据,因为根据个体的实足年龄以及抗生素对肠道微生物群的潜在影响,不同种类的抗生素对IBD的发展构成不同的风险[7,8]。此外,尽管抗生素使用与IBD事件之间的联系已得到一致证明,但潜在感染与IBD后期发展之间的联系尚未得到证实。与Axelrad等人之前的数据相反,这项研究表明,儿童时期感染的频率可能不是儿童IBD bbb的重要危险因素。这可能是由于纳入了较轻的感染,因为这些基于调查的数据不依赖于临床编码,而临床编码本质上排除了在家管理的轻度感染。为此,当按感染严重程度分层时,Marild等人确实发现需要住院治疗的感染与IBD风险增加35%相关。虽然这项研究集中在生命的前3年-免疫和微生物组发育的关键时期-未来的工作还必须考虑到整个生命中持续发生的暴露。这将加深我们对IBD发展的长期风险因素的理解,并为未来的预防策略铺平道路。凯瑟琳L.斯通:写作-原稿,写作-审查和编辑。Adam S. Faye:写作-原稿,写作-审查和编辑。凯瑟琳·l·斯通声明没有利益冲突。Adam S. Faye报道了克罗恩病和结肠炎基金会、美国胃肠病学学院和美国国立卫生研究院的研究支持。Adam S. Faye曾获得武田、BMS和艾伯维的顾问费。这篇文章链接到Marild等人的论文。要查看本文,请访问https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18358。
期刊介绍:
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.