Effect of Inpatient Pharmacist-Led Medication Reconciliations on Medication-Related Interventions in Intensive Care Unit Recovery Centers.

IF 0.8 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Hospital Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1177/00185787241269113
Sarah K Singer, Kevin D Betthauser, Alexandra E Barber, Rebecca Bookstaver Korona, Deepali Dixit, Christine M Groth, Michael T Kenes, Pamela MacTavish, Rachel M Kruer, Cara M McDaniel, Allyson M McIntire, Emily Miller, Rima A Mohammad, Janelle O Poyant, Stephen H Rappaport, Jessica A Whitten, Siu Yan A Yeung, Joanna L Stollings
{"title":"Effect of Inpatient Pharmacist-Led Medication Reconciliations on Medication-Related Interventions in Intensive Care Unit Recovery Centers.","authors":"Sarah K Singer, Kevin D Betthauser, Alexandra E Barber, Rebecca Bookstaver Korona, Deepali Dixit, Christine M Groth, Michael T Kenes, Pamela MacTavish, Rachel M Kruer, Cara M McDaniel, Allyson M McIntire, Emily Miller, Rima A Mohammad, Janelle O Poyant, Stephen H Rappaport, Jessica A Whitten, Siu Yan A Yeung, Joanna L Stollings","doi":"10.1177/00185787241269113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Critical care pharmacists complete comprehensive medication reviews in Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) patients at Intensive Care Unit Recovery Centers (ICU-RCs) to optimize medication therapies after hospital discharge. Inpatient pharmacists often complete medication reconciliations prior to hospital discharge, which could affect interventions at an ICU-RC. However, this association remains ill-described. <b>Objective:</b> The purpose of this study was to, in patients with PICS, describe the effect of an inpatient, pharmacist-led medication reconciliation on the number of clinical pharmacist interventions at the first ICU-RC visit. <b>Methods:</b> This was a post-hoc subgroup analysis of an international, multicenter cohort study of adults who had a pharmacist-led comprehensive medication reconciliation conducted in 12 ICU-RCs. Only patients' first ICU-RC visit was eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was the number of medication interventions made at initial ICU-RC visit in PICS patients who had an inpatient, pharmacist-led medication reconciliation compared to those who did not. <b>Results:</b> Of 323 patients included, 83 received inpatient medication reconciliations and 240 did not. No difference was observed in the median number of medication interventions between groups (2 vs 2, <i>p</i> = .06). However, a higher incidence of any intervention (86.3% vs 78.3%, <i>p</i> = .09) and dose adjustment (20.4% vs 9.6%; <i>p</i> = .03) was observed in the no medication reconciliation group. Only ICU Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was associated with an increased odds of medication intervention at ICU-RC visit (aOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.05-1.25, <i>p</i> < .01). <b>Conclusion and Relevance:</b> No difference in the total number of medication interventions made by ICU-RC clinical pharmacists was observed in patients who received an inpatient, pharmacist-led medication reconciliation before hospital discharge compared to those who did not. Still, clinical observations within this study highlight the continued importance and study of clinical pharmacist involvement during transitions of care, including ICU-RC visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"59 6","pages":"650-659"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528765/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787241269113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Critical care pharmacists complete comprehensive medication reviews in Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) patients at Intensive Care Unit Recovery Centers (ICU-RCs) to optimize medication therapies after hospital discharge. Inpatient pharmacists often complete medication reconciliations prior to hospital discharge, which could affect interventions at an ICU-RC. However, this association remains ill-described. Objective: The purpose of this study was to, in patients with PICS, describe the effect of an inpatient, pharmacist-led medication reconciliation on the number of clinical pharmacist interventions at the first ICU-RC visit. Methods: This was a post-hoc subgroup analysis of an international, multicenter cohort study of adults who had a pharmacist-led comprehensive medication reconciliation conducted in 12 ICU-RCs. Only patients' first ICU-RC visit was eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was the number of medication interventions made at initial ICU-RC visit in PICS patients who had an inpatient, pharmacist-led medication reconciliation compared to those who did not. Results: Of 323 patients included, 83 received inpatient medication reconciliations and 240 did not. No difference was observed in the median number of medication interventions between groups (2 vs 2, p = .06). However, a higher incidence of any intervention (86.3% vs 78.3%, p = .09) and dose adjustment (20.4% vs 9.6%; p = .03) was observed in the no medication reconciliation group. Only ICU Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was associated with an increased odds of medication intervention at ICU-RC visit (aOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.05-1.25, p < .01). Conclusion and Relevance: No difference in the total number of medication interventions made by ICU-RC clinical pharmacists was observed in patients who received an inpatient, pharmacist-led medication reconciliation before hospital discharge compared to those who did not. Still, clinical observations within this study highlight the continued importance and study of clinical pharmacist involvement during transitions of care, including ICU-RC visits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院药剂师指导的药物调配对重症监护病房康复中心药物相关干预的影响。
背景:重症监护药剂师在重症监护病房康复中心(ICU-RC)对重症监护后综合征(PICS)患者进行全面的药物审查,以优化出院后的药物治疗。住院药剂师通常会在出院前完成药物对账,这可能会影响 ICU-RC 的干预措施。然而,这种关联仍未得到充分描述。研究目的本研究的目的是在 PICS 患者中描述由住院药剂师主导的药物调节对 ICU-RC 首次就诊时临床药剂师干预次数的影响。研究方法这是一项国际多中心队列研究的事后亚组分析,研究对象是在 12 家 ICU-RC 进行了药师主导的综合药物对账的成人患者。只有首次到 ICU-RC 就诊的患者才符合纳入条件。研究的主要结果是,与未进行药师指导的住院患者药物调节相比,进行过药师指导的 PICS 患者在首次 ICU-RC 就诊时进行药物干预的次数。结果:在纳入的 323 名患者中,83 人接受了住院患者药物对账,240 人未接受。两组患者的用药干预次数中位数无差异(2 vs 2,p = .06)。然而,在未进行药物调节组中,任何干预(86.3% vs 78.3%,p = .09)和剂量调整(20.4% vs 9.6%;p = .03)的发生率较高。只有 ICU 序列器官衰竭评估评分与 ICU-RC 访问时进行药物干预的几率增加有关(aOR 1.15,95% CI 1.05-1.25,p 结论和相关性:在出院前接受了由住院药剂师主导的药物调节的患者与未接受药物调节的患者相比,ICU-RC 临床药剂师进行的药物干预总数没有差异。尽管如此,本研究中的临床观察结果还是强调了临床药师参与护理过渡(包括 ICU-RC 访问)的持续重要性和研究意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital Pharmacy
Hospital Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Hospital Pharmacy is a monthly peer-reviewed journal that is read by pharmacists and other providers practicing in the inpatient and outpatient setting within hospitals, long-term care facilities, home care, and other health-system settings The Hospital Pharmacy Assistant Editor, Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, DSc, FASHP, is author of a Medication Error Report Analysis and founder of The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP), a nonprofit organization that provides education about adverse drug events and their prevention.
期刊最新文献
Cefepime/Enmetazobactam. Impact of a Medication Reconciliation Improvement Package on Adherence to Medication Reconciliation Among Internal Medicine Physicians: A Quality Improvement Project in a Lower-Middle Income Country. Implementing Research Into Practice as a Clinical Based New Practitioner Pharmacist. Phytonadione Utilization and the Risk of Bleeding in Chronic Liver Disease. Safety and Efficacy of Switching Patients With Type 2 Diabetes From Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists to Tirzepatide: A Case Series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1