{"title":"Estimating Reference Change Values Using Routine Patient Data: A Novel Pathology Database Approach.","authors":"Eirik Åsen Røys, Kristin Viste, Ralf Kellmann, Nora Alicia Guldhaug, Bashir Alaour, Marit Sverresdotter Sylte, Janniche Torsvik, Heidi Strand, Michael Marber, Torbjørn Omland, Elvar Theodorsson, Graham Ross Dallas Jones, Kristin Moberg Aakre","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvae166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The reference change value (RCV) is calculated by combining the within-subject biological variation (CVI) and local analytical variation (CVA). These calculations do not account for the variation seen in preanalytical conditions in routine practice or CVI in patients presenting for treatment. As a result, the RCVs may not reflect routine practice or align with clinicians' experiences. We propose a novel RCV approach based on routine patient data that is potentially more clinically relevant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used the refineR algorithm to determine RCVs using serial patient data extracted from a local Laboratory Information System (LIS). The model was applied to biomarkers with a range of result ratio distributions varying from normal to log-normal. Results were compared against conventional formula-based RCVs using CVI estimates from a state-of-the-art biological variation study. Monte Carlo simulations were also used to validate the LIS data approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RCVs estimated from LIS data were: 11-deoxycortisol (men): -70%/+196%, 17-hydroxyprogesterone (men): -49%/+100%, albumin: -10%/+11%, androstenedione (men): -47%/+96%, cortisol (men): -54%/+51%, cortisone (men): -32%/+51%, creatinine: -16%/+14%, phosphate (women): -23%/+29%, phosphate (men): -27%/+29%, testosterone (men): -38%/+60%. The formula-based RCV estimates showed similar but slightly lower results, and the Monte Carlo simulations confirmed the applicability of the new approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RCVs may be estimated from patient results without prior assumptions about the shape of the ratios between serial results. Laboratories can determine RCVs based on local practice and population.</p>","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae166","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The reference change value (RCV) is calculated by combining the within-subject biological variation (CVI) and local analytical variation (CVA). These calculations do not account for the variation seen in preanalytical conditions in routine practice or CVI in patients presenting for treatment. As a result, the RCVs may not reflect routine practice or align with clinicians' experiences. We propose a novel RCV approach based on routine patient data that is potentially more clinically relevant.
Methods: This study used the refineR algorithm to determine RCVs using serial patient data extracted from a local Laboratory Information System (LIS). The model was applied to biomarkers with a range of result ratio distributions varying from normal to log-normal. Results were compared against conventional formula-based RCVs using CVI estimates from a state-of-the-art biological variation study. Monte Carlo simulations were also used to validate the LIS data approach.
Results: The RCVs estimated from LIS data were: 11-deoxycortisol (men): -70%/+196%, 17-hydroxyprogesterone (men): -49%/+100%, albumin: -10%/+11%, androstenedione (men): -47%/+96%, cortisol (men): -54%/+51%, cortisone (men): -32%/+51%, creatinine: -16%/+14%, phosphate (women): -23%/+29%, phosphate (men): -27%/+29%, testosterone (men): -38%/+60%. The formula-based RCV estimates showed similar but slightly lower results, and the Monte Carlo simulations confirmed the applicability of the new approach.
Conclusions: RCVs may be estimated from patient results without prior assumptions about the shape of the ratios between serial results. Laboratories can determine RCVs based on local practice and population.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM).
The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics.
In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology.
The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.