Beyond a constant proton relative biological effectiveness: A survey of clinical and research perspectives among proton institutions in Europe and the United States.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics Pub Date : 2024-11-03 DOI:10.1002/acm2.14535
Jakob Ödén, Kjell Eriksson, Suryakant Kaushik, Erik Traneus
{"title":"Beyond a constant proton relative biological effectiveness: A survey of clinical and research perspectives among proton institutions in Europe and the United States.","authors":"Jakob Ödén, Kjell Eriksson, Suryakant Kaushik, Erik Traneus","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE) depends on factors like linear energy transfer (LET), tissue properties, dose, and biological endpoint, a constant RBE of 1.1 is recommended in clinical practice. This study surveys proton institutions to explore activities using functionalities beyond a constant proton RBE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Research versions of RayStation integrate functionalities considering variable proton RBE, LET, proton track-ends, and dirty dose. A survey of 19 institutions in Europe and the United States, with these functionalities available, investigated clinical adoption and research prospects using a 25-question online questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 16 institutions that responded (84% response rate), 13 were clinically active. These clinical institutions prescribe RBE = 1.1 but also employ planning strategies centered around special beam arrangements to address potentially enhanced RBE effects in serially structured organs at risk (OARs). Clinical plan evaluation encompassed beam angles/spot position (69%), dose-averaged LET (LET<sub>d</sub>) (46%), and variable RBE distributions (38%). High ratings (discrete scale: 1-5) were reported for the research functionalities using linear LET<sub>d</sub>-RBE models, LET<sub>d</sub>, track-end frequency and dirty dose (averages: 4.0-4.8), while LQ-based phenomenological RBE models dependent on LET<sub>d</sub> scored lower for optimization (average: 2.2) but congruent for evaluation (average: 4.1). The institutions preferred LET reported as LET<sub>d</sub> (94%), computed in unit-density water (56%), for all protons (63%), and lean toward LET<sub>d</sub>-based phenomenological RBE models for clinical use (> 50%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Proton institutions recognize RBE variability but adhere to a constant RBE while actively mitigating potential enhancements, particularly in serially structured OARs. Research efforts focus on planning techniques that utilize functionalities beyond a constant RBE, emphasizing standardized LET and RBE calculations to facilitate their adoption in clinical practice and improve clinical data collection. LET<sub>d</sub> calculated in unit-density water for all protons as input to adaptable phenomenological RBE models was the most suggested approach, aligning with predominant clinical LET and variable RBE reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e14535"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14535","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Although proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE) depends on factors like linear energy transfer (LET), tissue properties, dose, and biological endpoint, a constant RBE of 1.1 is recommended in clinical practice. This study surveys proton institutions to explore activities using functionalities beyond a constant proton RBE.

Methods: Research versions of RayStation integrate functionalities considering variable proton RBE, LET, proton track-ends, and dirty dose. A survey of 19 institutions in Europe and the United States, with these functionalities available, investigated clinical adoption and research prospects using a 25-question online questionnaire.

Results: Of the 16 institutions that responded (84% response rate), 13 were clinically active. These clinical institutions prescribe RBE = 1.1 but also employ planning strategies centered around special beam arrangements to address potentially enhanced RBE effects in serially structured organs at risk (OARs). Clinical plan evaluation encompassed beam angles/spot position (69%), dose-averaged LET (LETd) (46%), and variable RBE distributions (38%). High ratings (discrete scale: 1-5) were reported for the research functionalities using linear LETd-RBE models, LETd, track-end frequency and dirty dose (averages: 4.0-4.8), while LQ-based phenomenological RBE models dependent on LETd scored lower for optimization (average: 2.2) but congruent for evaluation (average: 4.1). The institutions preferred LET reported as LETd (94%), computed in unit-density water (56%), for all protons (63%), and lean toward LETd-based phenomenological RBE models for clinical use (> 50%).

Conclusions: Proton institutions recognize RBE variability but adhere to a constant RBE while actively mitigating potential enhancements, particularly in serially structured OARs. Research efforts focus on planning techniques that utilize functionalities beyond a constant RBE, emphasizing standardized LET and RBE calculations to facilitate their adoption in clinical practice and improve clinical data collection. LETd calculated in unit-density water for all protons as input to adaptable phenomenological RBE models was the most suggested approach, aligning with predominant clinical LET and variable RBE reporting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越质子相对生物有效性常数:对欧洲和美国质子机构临床和研究观点的调查。
目的:尽管质子相对生物有效性(RBE)取决于线性能量转移(LET)、组织特性、剂量和生物终点等因素,但临床实践中推荐使用 1.1 的恒定 RBE。本研究对质子机构进行了调查,以探索使用恒定质子 RBE 以外的功能的活动:方法:RayStation 的研究版本集成了考虑可变质子 RBE、LET、质子轨道末端和脏剂量的功能。我们对欧洲和美国 19 家拥有这些功能的机构进行了调查,通过一份包含 25 个问题的在线问卷调查了临床应用情况和研究前景:结果:在作出回复的 16 家机构(回复率为 84%)中,有 13 家机构在临床上开展活动。这些临床机构规定 RBE = 1.1,但也采用了以特殊射束安排为中心的计划策略,以解决在连续结构的高危器官(OAR)中可能增强的 RBE 效应。临床计划评估包括射束角度/光斑位置(69%)、剂量平均 LET(LETd)(46%)和可变 RBE 分布(38%)。对于使用线性 LETd-RBE 模型、LETd、轨端频率和脏剂量的研究功能,报告的评分较高(离散量表:1-5)(平均值:4.0-4.8),而基于 LQ 的现象 RBE 模型依赖于 LETd,在优化方面得分较低(平均值:2.2),但在评估方面一致(平均值:4.1)。质子机构更喜欢以 LETd 报告的 LET(94%)、以单位密度水计算的 LET(56%)和所有质子的 LET(63%),并倾向于将基于 LETd 的现象 RBE 模型用于临床(> 50%):质子机构认识到了 RBE 的可变性,但仍坚持使用恒定的 RBE,同时积极缓解潜在的增强,特别是在连续结构的 OAR 中。研究工作的重点是利用恒定 RBE 以外的功能进行规划的技术,强调标准化 LET 和 RBE 计算,以促进其在临床实践中的应用并改善临床数据的收集。建议最多的方法是在单位密度水中计算所有质子的 LETd,并将其作为适应性现象 RBE 模型的输入,这与临床上主要的 LET 和可变 RBE 报告相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
期刊最新文献
Development of an automated CBCT-based simulation-free platform for expedited palliative radiotherapy on a conventional linear accelerator. Patient-specific adaptive planning margin for whole bladder radiation therapy. Performance of recurrent neural networks with Monte Carlo dropout for predicting pharmacokinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging data. Calibration and volunteer testing of a prototype contactless respiratory motion detection system based on laser tracking. Development and application of a novel scintillation gel-based 3D dosimetry system for radiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1