首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics最新文献

英文 中文
Focal spot motion in digital breast tomosynthesis and its effect on spatial resolution 数字乳房断层合成中的焦点运动及其对空间分辨率的影响。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-09 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.70443
Colin J. Schaeffer, Katie W. Hulme, Ashley E. Rubinstein

Background

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has become standard practice; however, the acquisition method of DBT between vendors is far from standardized. Currently, there are three commercially available DBT tube motion techniques: (1) continuous motion, (2) step-and-shoot, and (3) continuous motion with flying focal spot. Each of these methods represents a trade-off between total acquisition time and focal spot blur.

Purpose

The aim of the study was to characterize the increase in effective focal spot size in DBT relative to standard 2D projections and assess the influence of this increase on spatial resolution using the modulation transfer function (MTF).

Methods

Focal spot size was measured for both a 2D acquisition and the 0° DBT projection using a 10 µm slit phantom. Imaging techniques were set to those used for a 2, 4, and 8 cm thick breast of 50/50 adipose/fat composition. MTF curves were measured using a copper edge phantom both at the breast support plane and 4 cm above the breast support.

Results

The effective focal spot size increase from 2D to DBT increased with breast thickness for all systems. The continuous motion systems showed the greatest increase in effective focal spot size with percent increases of 101% to 462% depending on unit and breast thickness. The flying focal spot system showed the smallest increase in effective focal spot size in DBT acquisitions, being 3%, 21%, and 25% for a 2, 4, and 8 cm thick breast, respectively. The step-and-shoot and flying focal spot systems showed no degradation in MTF curves due to increasing effective focal spot size in DBT acquisitions, while the continuous motion systems showed a reduction in the frequency at which the MTF curve reached 50% of 26%–45%.

Conclusion

Both step-and-shoot and flying focal spot systems minimized effective focal spot size increase in DBT acquisitions compared to continuous tube motion systems.

背景:数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)已成为标准做法;然而,厂商之间DBT的获取方式还远远没有标准化。目前,商业上可获得的DBT管运动技术有三种:(1)连续运动,(2)步进射击,(3)带飞行焦斑的连续运动。这些方法中的每一种都代表了总采集时间和焦斑模糊之间的权衡。目的:本研究的目的是描述DBT相对于标准二维投影的有效焦斑大小的增加,并利用调制传递函数(MTF)评估这种增加对空间分辨率的影响。方法:使用10µm狭缝模体测量二维采集和0°DBT投影的焦点光斑大小。成像技术设置为脂肪/脂肪组成各占50/50的2、4和8 cm厚乳房所使用的成像技术。在乳房支撑平面和乳房支撑上方4cm处使用铜边模体测量MTF曲线。结果:各系统的有效焦斑大小随乳房厚度的增加而增加。连续运动系统的有效焦斑尺寸增加最大,根据单位和乳房厚度的不同,有效焦斑尺寸增加了101%至462%。飞行焦斑系统在DBT采集中显示的有效焦斑大小增加最小,分别为2、4和8 cm厚乳房的3%、21%和25%。步进射击和飞行焦斑系统在DBT采集过程中,由于有效焦斑尺寸的增加,MTF曲线没有下降,而连续运动系统的MTF曲线达到26%-45%的50%的频率下降。结论:与连续管运动系统相比,步进射击和飞行焦斑系统都能最大限度地减少DBT捕获的有效焦斑尺寸增加。
{"title":"Focal spot motion in digital breast tomosynthesis and its effect on spatial resolution","authors":"Colin J. Schaeffer,&nbsp;Katie W. Hulme,&nbsp;Ashley E. Rubinstein","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70443","DOIUrl":"10.1002/acm2.70443","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has become standard practice; however, the acquisition method of DBT between vendors is far from standardized. Currently, there are three commercially available DBT tube motion techniques: (1) continuous motion, (2) step-and-shoot, and (3) continuous motion with flying focal spot. Each of these methods represents a trade-off between total acquisition time and focal spot blur.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The aim of the study was to characterize the increase in effective focal spot size in DBT relative to standard 2D projections and assess the influence of this increase on spatial resolution using the modulation transfer function (MTF).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Focal spot size was measured for both a 2D acquisition and the 0° DBT projection using a 10 µm slit phantom. Imaging techniques were set to those used for a 2, 4, and 8 cm thick breast of 50/50 adipose/fat composition. MTF curves were measured using a copper edge phantom both at the breast support plane and 4 cm above the breast support.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The effective focal spot size increase from 2D to DBT increased with breast thickness for all systems. The continuous motion systems showed the greatest increase in effective focal spot size with percent increases of 101% to 462% depending on unit and breast thickness. The flying focal spot system showed the smallest increase in effective focal spot size in DBT acquisitions, being 3%, 21%, and 25% for a 2, 4, and 8 cm thick breast, respectively. The step-and-shoot and flying focal spot systems showed no degradation in MTF curves due to increasing effective focal spot size in DBT acquisitions, while the continuous motion systems showed a reduction in the frequency at which the MTF curve reached 50% of 26%–45%.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Both step-and-shoot and flying focal spot systems minimized effective focal spot size increase in DBT acquisitions compared to continuous tube motion systems.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12788966/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145944034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ultra-fast dosimetric data collection with a commercial plastic scintillation detector in an MR-linac 超快速剂量学数据收集与商用塑料闪烁探测器在磁共振直线加速器。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.70460
Carlos Ferrer, Concepción Huertas, Marcos Feijoo, Alessandro Cardin, Moisés Sáez

Background

Plastic scintillation detectors (PSD) are widely used for detecting and measuring ionizing radiation. These detectors are versatile, with high efficiency, fast response and the ability to provide real-time measurements.

Purpose

Evaluate the suitability of Blue Physics PSD (BP-PSD) for performing ultra-fast dosimetric commissioning measurements with high accuracy and precision in a very short time.

Methods

Ultra-fast measurements were performed in water using a BP-PSD on an Elekta Unity MR-linac. Percentage depth doses (PDD) and profiles at different depths were measured at two movement velocities, 10 mm/s and 20 mm/s, for field sizes ranging from 10 × 10 cm2 to 1 × 1 cm2. Gamma analysis was conducted to compare these measurements with those obtained during machine commissioning using a PTW Semiflex 3D ionization chamber (for PDD) and a PTW micro-Diamond detector (for PDD and profiles). Gamma criteria of 2%/2 mm and 1%/1 mm dose difference/distance to agreement were studied, alongside field size, penumbra, and measurement time.

Results

All PDD and profile gamma passing rates were 100% at 2%/2 mm. At the stricter 1%/1 mm criteria, all PDD showed a passing rate above 96.97% for both velocities, with most of the profiles exceeding 95% at 10 mm/s and 90% at 20 mm/s. Gamma analysis results were superior for smaller fields (1 × 1 cm2 and 2 × 2 cm2) and generally better at 10 mm/s. On average, the penumbra measurements obtained with the PSD were greater than those achieved with the micro-Diamond detector. Measurement times were found to be between 7 and 14 times shorter for PDD, and between 5 and 9 times shorter for profiles at speeds of 10 mm/s and 20 mm/s, respectively.

Conclusions

Ultra-fast measurements using the Blue Physics PSD are suitable for acquiring dosimetric commissioning data with high accuracy and precision, and can be performed in a much shorter timeframe than with commonly used detectors.

背景:塑料闪烁探测器(PSD)广泛应用于电离辐射的探测和测量。这些探测器是多功能的,具有高效率,快速响应和提供实时测量的能力。目的:评估Blue Physics PSD (BP-PSD)在极短时间内进行高精度、超快速剂量学调试测量的适用性。方法:在Elekta Unity MR-linac上使用BP-PSD在水中进行超快速测量。在10 × 10 cm2至1 × 1 cm2范围内,以10 mm/s和20 mm/s两种移动速度测量了不同深度的百分比深度剂量(PDD)和剖面。伽马分析将这些测量结果与机器调试期间使用PTW Semiflex 3D电离室(用于PDD)和PTW微型金刚石探测器(用于PDD和轮廓)获得的测量结果进行比较。研究了2%/ 2mm和1%/ 1mm剂量差/一致距离的Gamma标准,以及视场大小、半影和测量时间。结果:所有PDD和剖面图γ在2%/ 2mm时通过率均为100%。在更严格的1%/1 mm标准下,所有PDD对两种速度的通过率均超过96.97%,其中大多数剖面在10 mm/s速度下超过95%,在20 mm/s速度下超过90%。伽玛分析结果在较小的区域(1 × 1 cm2和2 × 2 cm2)较好,通常在10 mm/s时较好。平均而言,使用PSD获得的半影测量值大于使用微金刚石探测器获得的测量值。在速度为10 mm/s和20 mm/s时,PDD的测量时间分别缩短了7到14倍,型材的测量时间缩短了5到9倍。结论:使用Blue Physics PSD的超快速测量适合于获得高精度和精密度的剂量学调试数据,并且可以在比常用检测器更短的时间内完成。
{"title":"Ultra-fast dosimetric data collection with a commercial plastic scintillation detector in an MR-linac","authors":"Carlos Ferrer,&nbsp;Concepción Huertas,&nbsp;Marcos Feijoo,&nbsp;Alessandro Cardin,&nbsp;Moisés Sáez","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70460","DOIUrl":"10.1002/acm2.70460","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Plastic scintillation detectors (PSD) are widely used for detecting and measuring ionizing radiation. These detectors are versatile, with high efficiency, fast response and the ability to provide real-time measurements.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Evaluate the suitability of Blue Physics PSD (BP-PSD) for performing ultra-fast dosimetric commissioning measurements with high accuracy and precision in a very short time.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Ultra-fast measurements were performed in water using a BP-PSD on an Elekta Unity MR-linac. Percentage depth doses (PDD) and profiles at different depths were measured at two movement velocities, 10 mm/s and 20 mm/s, for field sizes ranging from 10 × 10 cm<sup>2</sup> to 1 × 1 cm<sup>2</sup>. Gamma analysis was conducted to compare these measurements with those obtained during machine commissioning using a PTW Semiflex 3D ionization chamber (for PDD) and a PTW micro-Diamond detector (for PDD and profiles). Gamma criteria of 2%/2 mm and 1%/1 mm dose difference/distance to agreement were studied, alongside field size, penumbra, and measurement time.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>All PDD and profile gamma passing rates were 100% at 2%/2 mm. At the stricter 1%/1 mm criteria, all PDD showed a passing rate above 96.97% for both velocities, with most of the profiles exceeding 95% at 10 mm/s and 90% at 20 mm/s. Gamma analysis results were superior for smaller fields (1 × 1 cm<sup>2</sup> and 2 × 2 cm<sup>2</sup>) and generally better at 10 mm/s. On average, the penumbra measurements obtained with the PSD were greater than those achieved with the micro-Diamond detector. Measurement times were found to be between 7 and 14 times shorter for PDD, and between 5 and 9 times shorter for profiles at speeds of 10 mm/s and 20 mm/s, respectively.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Ultra-fast measurements using the Blue Physics PSD are suitable for acquiring dosimetric commissioning data with high accuracy and precision, and can be performed in a much shorter timeframe than with commonly used detectors.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12779937/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145917694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Margin reduction and optimal prescription isodose model for liver stereotactic radiotherapy with respiratory motion 肝立体定向放射治疗呼吸运动的切缘缩小及最佳处方等剂量模型。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.70455
Daisuke Kawahara, Hirokazu Masuda, Takuya Wada, Misato Kishi, Tsuyoshi Katsuta, Yuji Murakami

Purpose

This study aimed to establish a framework for optimizing planning target volume (PTV) margins in liver SBRT using virtual 4DCT (v4DCT), by introducing the concept of the Dosimetric Coverage Amplitude (DCA) to quantify motion tolerance and deriving an Optimal Margin (OM) that balances tumor coverage with normal-tissue sparing.

Methods

VMAT plans were developed using a whole-body phantom with a virtual tumor, ensuring that the prescription dose corresponded to D95% of the PTV. The 60%–80% isodose levels were defined relative to the maximum dose to represent alternative prescription surfaces. v4DCT simulated free-breathing conditions across 10 respiratory phases to generate virtual four-dimensional radiotherapy (v4DRT) dose distributions. The DCA was defined as the maximum respiratory amplitude at which GTV dose coverage (D100% or D99%) was maintained. Based on DCA analysis, the OM was determined as the clinically applicable margin derived from the isodose plan that satisfied the DCA condition and minimized normal tissue dose.

Results

DCA analysis revealed that GTV dose coverage was maintained for respiratory motion amplitudes up to 1.9–2.2 times larger than the conventional PTV margin of 10 mm. Taking into account GTV dose coverage, average GTV dose relative to the 80%-static reference, and normal-tissue dose, the 60% isodose plan was identified as the optimal prescription level. From this plan, the OM was calculated as 5.6 mm, representing a 44% reduction compared with the conventional 10-mm PTV, while maintaining GTV coverage and minimizing liver dose. This margin reduction was attributed to the steeper dose gradient associated with prescribing to a lower isodose level. The v4DCT approach enabled the generation of multiple respiratory phase images, allowing quantitative evaluation of motion-induced dose distribution and optimization of margins based on respiratory variability.

Conclusion

The proposed v4DCT-based framework demonstrated that the 60% isodose plan provided the optimal balance between tumor coverage and normal-tissue sparing, yielding an OM of 5.6 mm (44% reduction compared with the conventional 10-mm PTV). This approach offers a clinically applicable strategy for margin reduction in liver SBRT while maintaining robust dosimetric coverage.

目的:本研究旨在通过引入剂量覆盖幅度(DCA)的概念来量化运动耐受性,并得出平衡肿瘤覆盖与正常组织保留的最佳边界(OM),建立一个使用虚拟4DCT (v4DCT)优化肝脏SBRT规划靶体积(PTV)边界的框架。方法:采用带虚拟肿瘤的全身假体制定VMAT计划,确保处方剂量符合PTV的D95%。60%-80%等剂量水平被定义为相对于最大剂量来代表可选择的处方表面。v4DCT模拟10个呼吸期的自由呼吸条件,生成虚拟四维放疗(v4DRT)剂量分布。DCA定义为维持GTV剂量覆盖(D100%或D99%)时的最大呼吸振幅。根据DCA分析,确定OM为满足DCA条件和最小正常组织剂量的等剂量方案得出的临床适用边界。结果:DCA分析显示,GTV对呼吸运动幅度的剂量覆盖范围比常规PTV的10 mm大1.9-2.2倍。综合考虑GTV剂量覆盖率、相对于80%静态参考的平均GTV剂量和正常组织剂量,确定60%等剂量计划为最佳处方水平。根据该方案,OM计算为5.6 mm,与传统的10 mm PTV相比减少了44%,同时保持GTV覆盖范围并使肝脏剂量最小化。这种边际减少归因于与较低等剂量水平处方相关的更陡峭的剂量梯度。v4DCT方法能够生成多个呼吸期图像,允许定量评估运动引起的剂量分布和基于呼吸变异性的边缘优化。结论:提出的基于v4dct的框架表明,60%等剂量计划提供了肿瘤覆盖和正常组织保留之间的最佳平衡,产生5.6 mm的OM(与传统的10 mm PTV相比减少44%)。该方法提供了一种临床适用的策略,可以在保持稳健剂量覆盖的同时减少肝脏SBRT的边缘。
{"title":"Margin reduction and optimal prescription isodose model for liver stereotactic radiotherapy with respiratory motion","authors":"Daisuke Kawahara,&nbsp;Hirokazu Masuda,&nbsp;Takuya Wada,&nbsp;Misato Kishi,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Katsuta,&nbsp;Yuji Murakami","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70455","DOIUrl":"10.1002/acm2.70455","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study aimed to establish a framework for optimizing planning target volume (PTV) margins in liver SBRT using virtual 4DCT (v4DCT), by introducing the concept of the Dosimetric Coverage Amplitude (DCA) to quantify motion tolerance and deriving an Optimal Margin (OM) that balances tumor coverage with normal-tissue sparing.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>VMAT plans were developed using a whole-body phantom with a virtual tumor, ensuring that the prescription dose corresponded to D<sub>95%</sub> of the PTV. The 60%–80% isodose levels were defined relative to the maximum dose to represent alternative prescription surfaces. v4DCT simulated free-breathing conditions across 10 respiratory phases to generate virtual four-dimensional radiotherapy (v4DRT) dose distributions. The DCA was defined as the maximum respiratory amplitude at which GTV dose coverage (D100% or D99%) was maintained. Based on DCA analysis, the OM was determined as the clinically applicable margin derived from the isodose plan that satisfied the DCA condition and minimized normal tissue dose.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>DCA analysis revealed that GTV dose coverage was maintained for respiratory motion amplitudes up to 1.9–2.2 times larger than the conventional PTV margin of 10 mm. Taking into account GTV dose coverage, average GTV dose relative to the 80%-static reference, and normal-tissue dose, the 60% isodose plan was identified as the optimal prescription level. From this plan, the OM was calculated as 5.6 mm, representing a 44% reduction compared with the conventional 10-mm PTV, while maintaining GTV coverage and minimizing liver dose. This margin reduction was attributed to the steeper dose gradient associated with prescribing to a lower isodose level. The v4DCT approach enabled the generation of multiple respiratory phase images, allowing quantitative evaluation of motion-induced dose distribution and optimization of margins based on respiratory variability.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The proposed v4DCT-based framework demonstrated that the 60% isodose plan provided the optimal balance between tumor coverage and normal-tissue sparing, yielding an OM of 5.6 mm (44% reduction compared with the conventional 10-mm PTV). This approach offers a clinically applicable strategy for margin reduction in liver SBRT while maintaining robust dosimetric coverage.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12779934/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145917653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Initial experience with remote MRI scanning support in an oncology focused practice: Opportunities for expanded access to radiology care 在肿瘤学重点实践中获得远程MRI扫描支持的初步经验:扩大获得放射学护理的机会。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.70461
Christopher M. Walker, Maria G. Maldonado, Megan C. Jacobsen, Suprateek Kundu, Michelle L. Underwood, Joshua P. Yung, Brandy J. Reed, David Jaffray, R. Jason Stafford, Marshall E. Hicks, Caroline Chung, Aradhana M. Venkatesan

Background

As medical imaging demand grows, there is increasing stress on the currently available workforce to deliver consistent, high-quality imaging studies while ensuring rapid study turnaround times and round-the-clock radiology coverage. Advances in remote access technology facilitating remote scan assistance and control are now commercially available to address these pressing clinical needs.

Methods

This work evaluated an early clinical application of a virtual scanner operations system (syngo Virtual Cockpit (VA13A, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) for remote magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) monitoring and scan control at three geographically distant outpatient sites associated with our primary institution.

Results

The system facilitated execution of technically complex oncologic MRI exams at these geographically distant clinics with no measurable impact on acquisition time compared to MR imaging performed at our primary hospital location. Additional operational improvements were realized with the use of the system, including remote staff training, technical assistance, and scanning during staff shortages. This early iteration of remote scanning had some limitations including limited utility for additional assistance in the scanning of those protocols that require complex physical setup. Moreover, connectivity issues were noted to be a limiting factor that contributed to operational delays. It was still necessary to have an onsite MRI technologist at the scanner console to interface with the patient and ensure safe operation.

Conclusion

Despite these limitations, our initial experience demonstrates that the use of remote MRI scanning support facilitates staffing flexibility while providing expanded patient access to oncology MRI services.

背景:随着医学成像需求的增长,在确保快速的研究周转时间和24小时放射学覆盖的同时,现有的工作人员提供一致的、高质量的成像研究的压力越来越大。远程访问技术的进步促进了远程扫描协助和控制,现在可以商业化地解决这些迫切的临床需求。方法:本研究评估了虚拟扫描仪操作系统(syngo虚拟座舱(VA13A, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany)在与我们的主要机构相关的三个地理位置遥远的门诊点进行远程磁共振成像(MRI)监测和扫描控制的早期临床应用。结果:该系统促进了在这些地理位置遥远的诊所执行技术复杂的肿瘤MRI检查,与在我们的主要医院位置进行的MR成像相比,对采集时间没有可测量的影响。通过使用该系统,进一步改进了业务,包括远程工作人员培训、技术援助和工作人员短缺期间的扫描。这种远程扫描的早期迭代有一些局限性,包括在扫描那些需要复杂物理设置的协议时提供额外帮助的效用有限。此外,连接问题被认为是导致操作延迟的限制因素。仍然需要有一名现场MRI技术人员在扫描仪控制台与患者沟通并确保操作安全。结论:尽管存在这些限制,我们的初步经验表明,使用远程MRI扫描支持促进了人员配置的灵活性,同时为肿瘤MRI服务提供了更多的患者机会。
{"title":"Initial experience with remote MRI scanning support in an oncology focused practice: Opportunities for expanded access to radiology care","authors":"Christopher M. Walker,&nbsp;Maria G. Maldonado,&nbsp;Megan C. Jacobsen,&nbsp;Suprateek Kundu,&nbsp;Michelle L. Underwood,&nbsp;Joshua P. Yung,&nbsp;Brandy J. Reed,&nbsp;David Jaffray,&nbsp;R. Jason Stafford,&nbsp;Marshall E. Hicks,&nbsp;Caroline Chung,&nbsp;Aradhana M. Venkatesan","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70461","DOIUrl":"10.1002/acm2.70461","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>As medical imaging demand grows, there is increasing stress on the currently available workforce to deliver consistent, high-quality imaging studies while ensuring rapid study turnaround times and round-the-clock radiology coverage. Advances in remote access technology facilitating remote scan assistance and control are now commercially available to address these pressing clinical needs.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This work evaluated an early clinical application of a virtual scanner operations system (syngo Virtual Cockpit (VA13A, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) for remote magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) monitoring and scan control at three geographically distant outpatient sites associated with our primary institution.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The system facilitated execution of technically complex oncologic MRI exams at these geographically distant clinics with no measurable impact on acquisition time compared to MR imaging performed at our primary hospital location. Additional operational improvements were realized with the use of the system, including remote staff training, technical assistance, and scanning during staff shortages. This early iteration of remote scanning had some limitations including limited utility for additional assistance in the scanning of those protocols that require complex physical setup. Moreover, connectivity issues were noted to be a limiting factor that contributed to operational delays. It was still necessary to have an onsite MRI technologist at the scanner console to interface with the patient and ensure safe operation.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Despite these limitations, our initial experience demonstrates that the use of remote MRI scanning support facilitates staffing flexibility while providing expanded patient access to oncology MRI services.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12779931/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145917682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical evaluation of the golden beam data in the monaco treatment planning system for the harmony pro and infinity linear accelerators harmony pro和无限线性加速器摩纳哥治疗计划系统中金束数据的临床评价。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-05 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.70457
Wenchao Gao, Min Zhang, Shuchao Zhang, Jie Qi, Xin Wang, Liang Zhao, Ping Liu, Zhijun Yang, HongXiang Cheng
<div> <section> <h3> Background</h3> <p>Accurate dose calculations in radiotherapy depend on high-quality beam models in the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS). The accelerated go live (AGL) workflow, using a golden beam data (GBD) model, has improved beam modeling accuracy for various linear accelerators (linacs). However, similar studies specifically for the Harmony Pro, recently introduced for online adaptive radiotherapy, have not yet been reported internationally. Moreover, studies on dosimetric differences between TPS beam models with GBD and those with measured beam data (MBD) are limited, and no such studies have been published specifically for Elekta linacs.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Purpose</h3> <p>This study aimed to assess the clinical performance of GBD in the Monaco TPS for the harmony pro and infinity linacs.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Methods</h3> <p>Beam tuning and data collection were performed on the harmony pro and infinity linacs based on GBD. Subsequently, percentage depth doses (PDDs), off-axis dose profiles, output factors (OFs), absolute doses, and test fields were measured to evaluate the GBD model. Additionally, 31 clinical plans from multiple anatomical sites, including 17 conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) plans and 14 stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plans, were designed using the Monaco TPS (GBD model) and practically tested. An Infinity linac with MBD was introduced as a control.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>PDDs and profiles on both GBD linacs showed 100% passing rate (2%/2 mm). OFs and absolute doses on both GBD linacs agreed within ±1% and ±1.5%, respectively. Additionally, verification of the test fields yielded passing rates above 98% (2%/2 mm) for both GBD linacs. Furthermore, for CFRT plans, measurements on three linacs achieved a passing rate above 95% (3%/2 mm). The absolute dose deviations were within 3%, whereas one MBD linac case exceeded 3% (-3.73%). For SBRT plans, the gamma passing rates were 98.18 ± 1.58%, 98.76 ± 1.54%, and 94.72 ± 0.04% (3%/2 mm) and 96.69 ± 1.96, 96.29 ± 2.26, and 89.51 ± 0.06% (2%/2 mm), for the two GDB linacs and the MDB linac, respectively. The absolute dose deviations were within 3%, whereas two MBD linac cases exceeded 3% (−3.51%, −4.50%).</p> </section> <section> <h3> Conclusions</h3> <p>The harmony pro-GBD and infinity-GBD linac results demonstrated strong agreement with GBD. Clinical plans designed with Monaco TPS (GBD model) were
背景:精确的放射剂量计算依赖于摩纳哥治疗计划系统(TPS)中高质量的束流模型。采用金束数据(GBD)模型的加速上线(AGL)工作流,提高了各种直线加速器(linacs)的光束建模精度。然而,专门针对Harmony Pro的类似研究,最近用于在线适应性放疗,尚未在国际上报道。此外,关于具有GBD的TPS光束模型与具有测量光束数据(MBD)的TPS光束模型之间剂量学差异的研究是有限的,并且没有专门针对Elekta linacs的此类研究发表。目的:本研究旨在评估摩纳哥TPS对和谐线和无限线的GBD的临床表现。方法:对基于GBD的和谐直线机和无限直线机进行光束调谐和数据采集。随后,测量了百分比深度剂量(pdd)、离轴剂量曲线、输出因子(OFs)、绝对剂量和试验场,以评估GBD模型。此外,采用Monaco TPS (GBD模型)设计了31个多解剖部位的临床方案,包括17个常规分割放疗(CFRT)方案和14个立体定向体放疗(SBRT)方案,并进行了实际检验。引入了一个带MBD的无限直线加速器作为控制。结果:两种GBD直线的pdd和剖面图通过率均为100% (2%/ 2mm)。两种GBD直线的OFs和绝对剂量分别在±1%和±1.5%范围内一致。此外,测试现场的验证表明,两种GBD直线的合格率均超过98% (2%/ 2mm)。此外,对于CFRT方案,在三个直线机上的测量达到了95%以上的通过率(3%/ 2mm)。绝对剂量偏差在3%以内,而1例MBD直线病例超过3%(-3.73%)。对于SBRT方案,两种GDB直线器和MDB直线器的伽玛通良率分别为98.18±1.58%、98.76±1.54%和94.72±0.04% (3%/2 mm)和96.69±1.96、96.29±2.26和89.51±0.06% (2%/2 mm)。绝对剂量偏差在3%以内,2例MBD直线患者剂量偏差超过3%(-3.51%,-4.50%)。结论:和谐的亲GBD和无限的GBD线性结果与GBD有很强的一致性。采用摩纳哥TPS (GBD模型)设计的临床方案在两种GBD直线上均可接受。尽管Infinity-MBD直线上提供的GBD模型方案的测试结果与两种GBD直线上的测试结果存在一定差异,但大多数方案仍然可以接受。这表明摩纳哥TPS中基于gbd的建模在不同直线类型中提供了可靠的临床表现。
{"title":"Clinical evaluation of the golden beam data in the monaco treatment planning system for the harmony pro and infinity linear accelerators","authors":"Wenchao Gao,&nbsp;Min Zhang,&nbsp;Shuchao Zhang,&nbsp;Jie Qi,&nbsp;Xin Wang,&nbsp;Liang Zhao,&nbsp;Ping Liu,&nbsp;Zhijun Yang,&nbsp;HongXiang Cheng","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70457","DOIUrl":"10.1002/acm2.70457","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Background&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Accurate dose calculations in radiotherapy depend on high-quality beam models in the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS). The accelerated go live (AGL) workflow, using a golden beam data (GBD) model, has improved beam modeling accuracy for various linear accelerators (linacs). However, similar studies specifically for the Harmony Pro, recently introduced for online adaptive radiotherapy, have not yet been reported internationally. Moreover, studies on dosimetric differences between TPS beam models with GBD and those with measured beam data (MBD) are limited, and no such studies have been published specifically for Elekta linacs.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Purpose&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This study aimed to assess the clinical performance of GBD in the Monaco TPS for the harmony pro and infinity linacs.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Beam tuning and data collection were performed on the harmony pro and infinity linacs based on GBD. Subsequently, percentage depth doses (PDDs), off-axis dose profiles, output factors (OFs), absolute doses, and test fields were measured to evaluate the GBD model. Additionally, 31 clinical plans from multiple anatomical sites, including 17 conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) plans and 14 stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plans, were designed using the Monaco TPS (GBD model) and practically tested. An Infinity linac with MBD was introduced as a control.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;PDDs and profiles on both GBD linacs showed 100% passing rate (2%/2 mm). OFs and absolute doses on both GBD linacs agreed within ±1% and ±1.5%, respectively. Additionally, verification of the test fields yielded passing rates above 98% (2%/2 mm) for both GBD linacs. Furthermore, for CFRT plans, measurements on three linacs achieved a passing rate above 95% (3%/2 mm). The absolute dose deviations were within 3%, whereas one MBD linac case exceeded 3% (-3.73%). For SBRT plans, the gamma passing rates were 98.18 ± 1.58%, 98.76 ± 1.54%, and 94.72 ± 0.04% (3%/2 mm) and 96.69 ± 1.96, 96.29 ± 2.26, and 89.51 ± 0.06% (2%/2 mm), for the two GDB linacs and the MDB linac, respectively. The absolute dose deviations were within 3%, whereas two MBD linac cases exceeded 3% (−3.51%, −4.50%).&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The harmony pro-GBD and infinity-GBD linac results demonstrated strong agreement with GBD. Clinical plans designed with Monaco TPS (GBD model) were","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12766699/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145900539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quantifying stent-induced dose perturbations in intravascular brachytherapy using 3D- printed phantoms and film dosimetry 用3D打印模型和胶片剂量法定量血管内近距离放射治疗中支架引起的剂量扰动。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-05 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.70432
Jessica S. Jung, Lyu Huang, Nicholas Coupera, Yijian Cao, Jenghwa Chang
<div> <section> <h3> Background</h3> <p>Coronary artery disease (CAD), the leading cause of death worldwide, is the narrowing of coronary arteries due to atherosclerotic plaque buildup. A common treatment for CAD is percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), often involving stent placement. However, a common complication or in-stent restenosis (ISR) can occur in 10%–20% of patients which call for the use of therapies like intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT). IVBT delivers targeted beta radiation, typically from Sr-90/Y-90 sources, to inhibit neointimal hyperplasia and reduce restenosis rates. Accurate dose delivery is critical to treatment success, but challenges such as source positioning and dose uniformity persist. Recent advances in 3D printing and radiochromic film dosimetry offer promising tools for more precise dose verification in IVBT, enabling high-resolution assessment of dose distributions and stent-induced perturbations.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Purpose</h3> <p>IVBT requires precise position to ensure effective treatment. However, stents introduce complexities in dose distribution due to their material and geometry, which can lead to attenuation and impact treatment outcomes. This study aimed to quantify stent-induced dose perturbations using a custom 3D-printed stent phantom and Gafchromic EBT-4 Film, providing insights for dosimetry of IVBT.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Methods</h3> <p>Dose measurements were conducted using a custom designed 3D-printed stent phantom. The film calibration was performed using the RIT film dosimetry package from 0 to 12 Gy. The phantom was designed for a Synergy XD Stent with a diameter of 3 mm with the Sr-90/Y-90 source catheter position designed to be in the center of the stent. Percent depth dose (PDD) distributions were modeled using the third-order exponential polynomial function and compared with Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate agreement. Discrepancies were quantified using root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). The stent effect on PDD was analyzed using a paired <i>t</i>-test, and a dose reduction factor (DRF) was calculated to assess attenuation.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>The third-order exponential polynomial function demonstrated an excellent fit for both configurations, with R-squared values of 0.999 (no stent) and 0.999 (with stent). RMSE and MAE values were slightly higher for the with-stent dataset (0.038 and 0.036, respectively), reflecting increased discrepancies. The paired <i>t</i>-test showed a statistically significant difference betw
背景:冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是由动脉粥样硬化斑块堆积引起的冠状动脉狭窄,是世界范围内导致死亡的主要原因。冠心病的常见治疗是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),通常包括支架置入。然而,常见的并发症或支架内再狭窄(ISR)可能发生在10%-20%的患者中,这些患者需要使用血管内近距离放射治疗(IVBT)等疗法。IVBT提供靶向β辐射,通常来自Sr-90/Y-90源,以抑制内膜增生并降低再狭窄率。准确的剂量传递对治疗成功至关重要,但诸如源定位和剂量均匀性等挑战仍然存在。3D打印和放射致色膜剂量学的最新进展为IVBT中更精确的剂量验证提供了有前途的工具,能够对剂量分布和支架引起的扰动进行高分辨率评估。目的:IVBT需要精确的定位,以确保有效的治疗。然而,由于其材料和几何形状,支架在剂量分布方面引入了复杂性,这可能导致衰减并影响治疗结果。本研究旨在使用定制的3d打印支架幻影和Gafchromic EBT-4薄膜来量化支架引起的剂量扰动,为IVBT的剂量学提供见解。方法:使用定制设计的3d打印支架模体进行剂量测量。使用RIT薄膜剂量计包在0至12 Gy范围内进行薄膜校准。该模体设计用于直径为3mm的Synergy XD支架,Sr-90/Y-90源导管位置设计在支架的中心。百分比深度剂量(PDD)分布使用三阶指数多项式函数建模,并与蒙特卡罗模拟进行比较,以评估一致性。采用均方根误差(RMSE)和平均绝对误差(MAE)对差异进行量化。使用配对t检验分析支架对PDD的影响,并计算剂量减少因子(DRF)来评估衰减。结果:三阶指数多项式函数对两种构型均具有很好的拟合性,其r平方值分别为0.999(无支架)和0.999(有支架)。支架组的RMSE和MAE值略高(分别为0.038和0.036),反映了差异的增加。配对t检验显示PDD值之间的差异有统计学意义(t = -6.591, p)。结论:支架的存在显著影响IVBT的剂量传递,在临床相关深度内衰减约4.5%的剂量。这些发现强调了在治疗计划中考虑支架诱导的衰减以确保准确剂量递送的重要性。定制支架幻影显示了其在捕获剂量扰动方面的实用性,为改进IVBT剂量测定提供了有效的工具。
{"title":"Quantifying stent-induced dose perturbations in intravascular brachytherapy using 3D- printed phantoms and film dosimetry","authors":"Jessica S. Jung,&nbsp;Lyu Huang,&nbsp;Nicholas Coupera,&nbsp;Yijian Cao,&nbsp;Jenghwa Chang","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70432","DOIUrl":"10.1002/acm2.70432","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Background&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Coronary artery disease (CAD), the leading cause of death worldwide, is the narrowing of coronary arteries due to atherosclerotic plaque buildup. A common treatment for CAD is percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), often involving stent placement. However, a common complication or in-stent restenosis (ISR) can occur in 10%–20% of patients which call for the use of therapies like intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT). IVBT delivers targeted beta radiation, typically from Sr-90/Y-90 sources, to inhibit neointimal hyperplasia and reduce restenosis rates. Accurate dose delivery is critical to treatment success, but challenges such as source positioning and dose uniformity persist. Recent advances in 3D printing and radiochromic film dosimetry offer promising tools for more precise dose verification in IVBT, enabling high-resolution assessment of dose distributions and stent-induced perturbations.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Purpose&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;IVBT requires precise position to ensure effective treatment. However, stents introduce complexities in dose distribution due to their material and geometry, which can lead to attenuation and impact treatment outcomes. This study aimed to quantify stent-induced dose perturbations using a custom 3D-printed stent phantom and Gafchromic EBT-4 Film, providing insights for dosimetry of IVBT.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Dose measurements were conducted using a custom designed 3D-printed stent phantom. The film calibration was performed using the RIT film dosimetry package from 0 to 12 Gy. The phantom was designed for a Synergy XD Stent with a diameter of 3 mm with the Sr-90/Y-90 source catheter position designed to be in the center of the stent. Percent depth dose (PDD) distributions were modeled using the third-order exponential polynomial function and compared with Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate agreement. Discrepancies were quantified using root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). The stent effect on PDD was analyzed using a paired &lt;i&gt;t&lt;/i&gt;-test, and a dose reduction factor (DRF) was calculated to assess attenuation.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The third-order exponential polynomial function demonstrated an excellent fit for both configurations, with R-squared values of 0.999 (no stent) and 0.999 (with stent). RMSE and MAE values were slightly higher for the with-stent dataset (0.038 and 0.036, respectively), reflecting increased discrepancies. The paired &lt;i&gt;t&lt;/i&gt;-test showed a statistically significant difference betw","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12766702/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145900514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Beam quality assessment: Evaluating aluminum purity's effects 光束质量评价:评价铝纯度的影响。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-02 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.70450
Sara Mohammadi, Joshua Deslongchamps, Jiali Wang, Mary Ellen Jafari
<div> <section> <h3> Purpose</h3> <p>This study evaluates the effect of aluminum (Al) purity on Half Value Layer (HVL) measurements and beam quality across mobile and fixed radiographic units. Beam quality assessment is a fundamental aspect in ensuring the safe and effective delivery of ionizing radiation to patients. Standards for this assessment vary nationally and internationally, leading to ambiguity within measurements, which may cause regulatory compliance issues.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Methods</h3> <p>Beam filtration was measured using Al filters of 99.0% and 99.5% purity, for mobile and fixed radiographic units utilizing radiation detectors from three manufacturers. Methods and geometry followed IEC standards for HVL measurements with techniques representative of those used for standard patients. Measurements were made across a range of thicknesses of aluminum incrementally centered around the projected HVL. HVL was determined through exponential fitting of exposure versus Al thickness. Additionally, for each solid-state detector, a single-shot HVL measurement was performed without aluminum in the x-ray beam, as this method is commonly used for HVL determination in clinical settings.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>When Al filtration purity was increased from 99.0% to 99.5%, HVL measurements rose by 1.35% to 4.82%, with a median increase of 3.26% (95% confidence interval 2.68%–3.85%). The deviation between single-shot HVL measurements and interpolated values ranged from 0.16% to 8.99% (median: 4.90%; 95% CI: 3.32%–6.49%) for 99.0% purity Al, and from 0.43% to 4.79% (median: 2.62%; 95% CI: 1.60%–3.64%) for 99.5% purity Al.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Conclusion</h3> <p>There is a discrepancy in the purity of reference aluminum used for determining HVL specified in the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standards. FDA requires Type-1100 aluminum with a minimum of 99.0% purity, while IEC requires a minimum 99.9% purity. Our results indicate that measured HVL values increase with aluminum purity in a magnitude sufficient to result in units falsely failing regulatory requirements for minimum HVL if different types of aluminum are used by manufacturers and physicists. Medical physicists should be aware of this issue when testing HVL for compliance with regulatory standards. This study did not provide a direct comparison of FDA and IEC standards; instead, it demonstrates the direction and magnitude of HVL sensitivity to aluminum purity within clinically realis
目的:本研究评估铝(Al)纯度对半值层(HVL)测量和移动和固定x线摄影设备光束质量的影响。束流质量评估是确保向患者安全有效地提供电离辐射的一个基本方面。这种评估的标准在国内和国际上各不相同,导致测量结果的模糊性,这可能导致法规遵从性问题。方法:使用纯度为99.0%和99.5%的Al滤光片,对移动和固定的射线照相装置使用三家制造商的辐射探测器进行光束过滤。HVL测量的方法和几何形状遵循IEC标准,采用具有代表性的用于标准患者的技术。测量是在以投影HVL为中心的铝厚度范围内进行的。HVL通过暴露与铝厚度的指数拟合来确定。此外,对于每个固态探测器,在x射线束中不使用铝进行单次HVL测量,因为这种方法通常用于临床环境中的HVL测定。结果:当Al过滤纯度从99.0%提高到99.5%时,HVL测量值提高1.35% ~ 4.82%,中位数增加3.26%(95%置信区间为2.68% ~ 3.85%)。对于纯度为99.0%的Al,单次HVL测量值与内插值的偏差范围为0.16% ~ 8.99%(中位数:4.90%;95% CI: 3.32% ~ 6.49%);对于纯度为99.5%的Al,其偏差范围为0.43% ~ 4.79%(中位数:2.62%;95% CI: 1.60% ~ 3.64%)。结论:用于测定美国食品药品管理局(FDA)和国际电工委员会(IEC)标准中规定的HVL的参考铝的纯度存在差异。FDA要求1100型铝的纯度至少为99.0%,而IEC要求纯度至少为99.9%。我们的研究结果表明,如果制造商和物理学家使用不同类型的铝,测量的HVL值会随着铝纯度的增加而增加,其幅度足以导致单位错误地达不到最低HVL的监管要求。在测试HVL是否符合监管标准时,医学物理学家应该意识到这个问题。本研究没有提供FDA和IEC标准的直接比较;相反,它展示了临床实际材料中HVL对铝纯度敏感性的方向和大小,突出了铝纯度看似微小的变化如何实质性地影响光束质量的调节解释。
{"title":"Beam quality assessment: Evaluating aluminum purity's effects","authors":"Sara Mohammadi,&nbsp;Joshua Deslongchamps,&nbsp;Jiali Wang,&nbsp;Mary Ellen Jafari","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70450","DOIUrl":"10.1002/acm2.70450","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Purpose&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This study evaluates the effect of aluminum (Al) purity on Half Value Layer (HVL) measurements and beam quality across mobile and fixed radiographic units. Beam quality assessment is a fundamental aspect in ensuring the safe and effective delivery of ionizing radiation to patients. Standards for this assessment vary nationally and internationally, leading to ambiguity within measurements, which may cause regulatory compliance issues.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Beam filtration was measured using Al filters of 99.0% and 99.5% purity, for mobile and fixed radiographic units utilizing radiation detectors from three manufacturers. Methods and geometry followed IEC standards for HVL measurements with techniques representative of those used for standard patients. Measurements were made across a range of thicknesses of aluminum incrementally centered around the projected HVL. HVL was determined through exponential fitting of exposure versus Al thickness. Additionally, for each solid-state detector, a single-shot HVL measurement was performed without aluminum in the x-ray beam, as this method is commonly used for HVL determination in clinical settings.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;When Al filtration purity was increased from 99.0% to 99.5%, HVL measurements rose by 1.35% to 4.82%, with a median increase of 3.26% (95% confidence interval 2.68%–3.85%). The deviation between single-shot HVL measurements and interpolated values ranged from 0.16% to 8.99% (median: 4.90%; 95% CI: 3.32%–6.49%) for 99.0% purity Al, and from 0.43% to 4.79% (median: 2.62%; 95% CI: 1.60%–3.64%) for 99.5% purity Al.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;There is a discrepancy in the purity of reference aluminum used for determining HVL specified in the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standards. FDA requires Type-1100 aluminum with a minimum of 99.0% purity, while IEC requires a minimum 99.9% purity. Our results indicate that measured HVL values increase with aluminum purity in a magnitude sufficient to result in units falsely failing regulatory requirements for minimum HVL if different types of aluminum are used by manufacturers and physicists. Medical physicists should be aware of this issue when testing HVL for compliance with regulatory standards. This study did not provide a direct comparison of FDA and IEC standards; instead, it demonstrates the direction and magnitude of HVL sensitivity to aluminum purity within clinically realis","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12758990/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145892344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Organ-specific low-dose assessment in pediatric radiotherapy using nanodot OSL and NTCP modeling: Application to medulloblastoma 使用纳米点OSL和NTCP模型进行儿童放射治疗中器官特异性低剂量评估:在成神经管细胞瘤中的应用。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-02 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.70444
Meriem Tantaoui, Mustapha Krim, Fatimzahra Chehab, El Mehdi Essaidi, Mohammed Reda Mesradi, Abdelkrim Kartouni, Souha Sahraoui
<div> <section> <h3> Background</h3> <p>In pediatric radiotherapy, controlling low-dose exposure is a major challenge, particularly in the treatment of medulloblastoma, where the long life expectancy of young patients makes optimization of radioprotection crucial.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Purpose</h3> <p>This study provides a comprehensive and quantitative assessment of low-dose exposure to normal tissues across the entire radiotherapy workflow, with a particular emphasis on the contribution of imaging procedures (planning computed tomography (CT) and repeated cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquisitions) in addition to therapeutic irradiation. The cumulative impact of these steps is evaluated together with the associated risks using Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) modeling.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Methods</h3> <p>A pediatric anthropomorphic phantom was equipped with optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters to measure doses delivered to normal organs during the planning CT, 15 CBCT scans for positioning, and simulated treatment plans with different radiotherapy techniques. NTCPs were calculated for critical organs based on the dosimetric data from imaging and treatment planning.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>Each imaging acquisition delivered between 3 and 7 mGy per organ, with the cumulative dose from CT and CBCT remaining consistently below 0.5 Gy, representing less than 1% of the prescribed therapeutic dose. Although small compared to therapeutic irradiation, this contribution remains biologically relevant when considering cumulative low-dose exposure in pediatric patients. Dosimetric comparison of treatment techniques showed that volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) significantly reduced both the mean organ dose and the NTCP compared to three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT): heart dose decreased from 16 Gy (NTCP 30%) to 6.6 Gy (NTCP 0.4%), and thyroid dose from 27.1 Gy (NTCP 12%) to 8.7 Gy (NTCP < 1%). Some organs, such as the brain and chiasma, remained highly exposed, reflecting the dosimetric constraints of comprehensive tumor coverage.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Conclusion</h3> <p>By systematically quantifying and integrating imaging doses with therapeutic irradiation, this study underscores the often underestimated role of imaging in cumulative exposure during pediatric craniospinal irradiation. The results provide a solid foundation for tailoring radioprotec
背景:在儿童放射治疗中,控制低剂量暴露是一个主要挑战,特别是在髓母细胞瘤的治疗中,年轻患者的预期寿命长,因此优化放射防护至关重要。目的:本研究对整个放射治疗工作流程中正常组织的低剂量照射进行了全面和定量的评估,特别强调了成像程序(计划计算机断层扫描(CT)和重复锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)获取)除了治疗性放射之外的贡献。使用正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)模型评估这些步骤的累积影响以及相关风险。方法:在拟人儿童模型上安装光刺激发光(OSL)剂量计,测量正常器官在计划CT、15次CBCT扫描定位时的剂量,并模拟不同放疗技术的治疗方案。根据影像学和治疗计划的剂量学数据计算关键器官的ntc。结果:每个器官的每次成像剂量在3至7毫戈瑞之间,CT和CBCT的累积剂量始终低于0.5毫戈瑞,不到规定治疗剂量的1%。虽然与治疗性照射相比,这一贡献很小,但在考虑儿科患者的累积低剂量照射时,这一贡献仍然具有生物学意义。剂量学比较显示,与三维适形放射治疗(3D-CRT)相比,体积调节电弧治疗(VMAT)显著降低了平均器官剂量和NTCP:心脏剂量从16 Gy (NTCP 30%)降至6.6 Gy (NTCP 0.4%),甲状腺剂量从27.1 Gy (NTCP 12%)降至8.7 Gy (NTCP)。通过系统地量化和整合影像学剂量与治疗性照射,本研究强调了影像学在儿童颅脊髓照射累积暴露中的作用,通常被低估。研究结果为制定放射防护战略提供了坚实的基础,并强调需要重新考虑规划和后续方案,以便为儿童提供更安全、更有针对性的治疗。
{"title":"Organ-specific low-dose assessment in pediatric radiotherapy using nanodot OSL and NTCP modeling: Application to medulloblastoma","authors":"Meriem Tantaoui,&nbsp;Mustapha Krim,&nbsp;Fatimzahra Chehab,&nbsp;El Mehdi Essaidi,&nbsp;Mohammed Reda Mesradi,&nbsp;Abdelkrim Kartouni,&nbsp;Souha Sahraoui","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70444","DOIUrl":"10.1002/acm2.70444","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Background&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;In pediatric radiotherapy, controlling low-dose exposure is a major challenge, particularly in the treatment of medulloblastoma, where the long life expectancy of young patients makes optimization of radioprotection crucial.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Purpose&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This study provides a comprehensive and quantitative assessment of low-dose exposure to normal tissues across the entire radiotherapy workflow, with a particular emphasis on the contribution of imaging procedures (planning computed tomography (CT) and repeated cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquisitions) in addition to therapeutic irradiation. The cumulative impact of these steps is evaluated together with the associated risks using Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) modeling.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;A pediatric anthropomorphic phantom was equipped with optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters to measure doses delivered to normal organs during the planning CT, 15 CBCT scans for positioning, and simulated treatment plans with different radiotherapy techniques. NTCPs were calculated for critical organs based on the dosimetric data from imaging and treatment planning.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Each imaging acquisition delivered between 3 and 7 mGy per organ, with the cumulative dose from CT and CBCT remaining consistently below 0.5 Gy, representing less than 1% of the prescribed therapeutic dose. Although small compared to therapeutic irradiation, this contribution remains biologically relevant when considering cumulative low-dose exposure in pediatric patients. Dosimetric comparison of treatment techniques showed that volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) significantly reduced both the mean organ dose and the NTCP compared to three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT): heart dose decreased from 16 Gy (NTCP 30%) to 6.6 Gy (NTCP 0.4%), and thyroid dose from 27.1 Gy (NTCP 12%) to 8.7 Gy (NTCP &lt; 1%). Some organs, such as the brain and chiasma, remained highly exposed, reflecting the dosimetric constraints of comprehensive tumor coverage.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;By systematically quantifying and integrating imaging doses with therapeutic irradiation, this study underscores the often underestimated role of imaging in cumulative exposure during pediatric craniospinal irradiation. The results provide a solid foundation for tailoring radioprotec","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12758999/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145892532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A bias field correction workflow based on generative adversarial network for abdominal cancers treated with 0.35T MR-LINAC 基于生成对抗网络的0.35T MR-LINAC治疗腹部肿瘤的偏置场校正工作流程。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-02 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.70448
Ching-Ching Yang, Hung-Te Yang

Purpose

In this study, a bias field correction workflow was proposed to improve the flexibility and generalizability of the generative adversarial network (GAN) model for abdominal cancer patients treated with a 0.35T magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator (MR-LINAC) system.

Methods

Model training was performed using brain MR images acquired on a 3T diagnostic scanner, while model testing was performed using abdominal MR images obtained using a 0.35T MR-LINAC system. The performance of the proposed workflow was first compared with the GAN model using root-mean-square error (RMSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and structural similarity index measure (SSIM). To assess the impact of the workflow on image segmentation, it was also compared with the N4ITK algorithm. Segmentation was performed using the k-means clustering algorithm with three clusters corresponding to air, fat, and soft tissue. Segmentation accuracy was then evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC).

Results

The RMSE values were 30.59, 12.06, 10.37 for the bias field-corrupted images (IIN), GAN-corrected images (IGAN), and images corrected with the proposed workflow (IOUT), respectively. Corresponding PSNR values were 42.34, 46.04, 47.04 dB, and SSIM values were 0.84, 0.96, 0.98. For segmentation accuracy, the mean DSC for air masks was 0.95, 0.97, and 0.97; for fat masks, 0.61, 0.71, and 0.74; and for soft tissue masks, 0.60, 0.68, and 0.69, corresponding to IIN, N4ITK-corrected images (IN4ITK), and IOUT, respectively

Conclusion

By effectively mitigating bias field artifacts, the proposed workflow has the potential to strengthen the clinical utility of MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy for abdominal cancers, ensuring safer and more accurate radiation delivery.

目的:在本研究中,提出了一个偏差场校正工作流,以提高使用0.35T磁共振成像线性加速器(MR-LINAC)系统治疗的腹部癌症患者的生成对抗网络(GAN)模型的灵活性和泛化性。方法:使用3T诊断扫描仪获得的脑部MR图像进行模型训练,使用0.35T MR- linac系统获得的腹部MR图像进行模型测试。首先,使用均方根误差(RMSE)、峰值信噪比(PSNR)和结构相似指数度量(SSIM)将所提出工作流的性能与GAN模型进行比较。为了评估工作流对图像分割的影响,还将其与N4ITK算法进行了比较。使用k-means聚类算法进行分割,其中三个聚类分别对应空气、脂肪和软组织。然后使用Dice相似系数(DSC)评估分割精度。结果:偏差场损坏图像(IIN)、gan校正图像(IGAN)和采用建议工作流校正的图像(IOUT)的RMSE值分别为30.59、12.06和10.37。相应的PSNR值分别为42.34、46.04、47.04 dB, SSIM值分别为0.84、0.96、0.98。在分割精度方面,口罩的平均DSC分别为0.95、0.97和0.97;对于脂肪面膜,分别为0.61、0.71和0.74;对于软组织掩膜,分别对应于IIN、n4itk校正图像(IN4ITK)和IOUT,分别为0.60、0.68和0.69。结论:通过有效减轻偏置场伪影,所提出的工作流程有可能加强mri引导下腹部肿瘤自适应放疗的临床应用,确保更安全、更准确的放射输送。
{"title":"A bias field correction workflow based on generative adversarial network for abdominal cancers treated with 0.35T MR-LINAC","authors":"Ching-Ching Yang,&nbsp;Hung-Te Yang","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70448","DOIUrl":"10.1002/acm2.70448","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In this study, a bias field correction workflow was proposed to improve the flexibility and generalizability of the generative adversarial network (GAN) model for abdominal cancer patients treated with a 0.35T magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator (MR-LINAC) system.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Model training was performed using brain MR images acquired on a 3T diagnostic scanner, while model testing was performed using abdominal MR images obtained using a 0.35T MR-LINAC system. The performance of the proposed workflow was first compared with the GAN model using root-mean-square error (RMSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and structural similarity index measure (SSIM). To assess the impact of the workflow on image segmentation, it was also compared with the N4ITK algorithm. Segmentation was performed using the k-means clustering algorithm with three clusters corresponding to air, fat, and soft tissue. Segmentation accuracy was then evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The RMSE values were 30.59, 12.06, 10.37 for the bias field-corrupted images (I<sub>IN</sub>), GAN-corrected images (I<sub>GAN</sub>), and images corrected with the proposed workflow (I<sub>OUT</sub>), respectively. Corresponding PSNR values were 42.34, 46.04, 47.04 dB, and SSIM values were 0.84, 0.96, 0.98. For segmentation accuracy, the mean DSC for air masks was 0.95, 0.97, and 0.97; for fat masks, 0.61, 0.71, and 0.74; and for soft tissue masks, 0.60, 0.68, and 0.69, corresponding to I<sub>IN</sub>, N4ITK-corrected images (I<sub>N4ITK</sub>), and I<sub>OUT</sub>, respectively</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>By effectively mitigating bias field artifacts, the proposed workflow has the potential to strengthen the clinical utility of MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy for abdominal cancers, ensuring safer and more accurate radiation delivery.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70448","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145892389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical experience with a same-day simulation and treatment program for stereotactic radiation therapy on a C-arm linac c臂直线机立体定向放射治疗当日模拟和治疗方案的临床经验。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-02 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.70449
Michalis Aristophanous, Sernger Shen, Dylan G. Hsu, Dongxu Wang, Ase Ballangrud, Jean M. Moran, Anyi Li, Sean M. McBride, Daniel Gomez, Luke R. G. Pike, Kathryn Beal, Jonathan T. Yang, Laura Cervino

Purpose

We report our experience with the implementation of a same-day simulation and treatment C-arm linear accelerator (linac)-based stereotactic program for patients with intracranial and extracranial metastatic disease.

Methods

Between May 2021 and October 2023, patients were treated in our same-day program with linac-based SRS/SBRT. Two slots per week were offered. Patients with expedited clinical needs, able to undergo SRS/SBRT simulation and treatment, were considered. Extracranial treatments were required to meet standards for automated intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) optimization. Intracranial treatments were limited to 1–3 lesions and 1–2 isocenters. The day before treatment, the patient needed to be identified, and any diagnostic imaging had to be available for the physician and dosimetrist to discuss the plan. On the day of treatment, simulation was scheduled for 8 AM and treatment at 4 PM by default, with the goal to complete treatment by 6 PM. We analyzed information about each patient's treatment plan and time spent on each step of the workflow.

Results

Ninety-seven patients followed our same-day workflow and were included in the analysis. Seventy-five patients received intracranial SRS (57% to 1 lesion), while 22 patients received extracranial treatments (50% to the extremities). Simulation often required additional time to be completed, finishing a median 18 min (IQR 5–40) after the goal end time. The median time between simulation completion and end of the same-day treatment was 7.8 h (IQR 7.4–8.6). Treatment technique and the number of target volumes had a significant impact on planning time. The median treatment end time was 5:13 PM (IQR 4:46 PM–6:01 PM), with 74% ending by 6 PM.

Conclusions

A linac-based program to treat patients with SRS/SBRT in an expedited fashion was established and successfully treated patients in a same-day timeline. Careful selection of planning techniques to limit plan complexity and adding automation in time-consuming parts of the process are crucial when developing expedited workflows.

目的:我们报告了我们对颅内和颅外转移性疾病患者实施当日模拟和治疗基于c臂直线加速器(linac)的立体定向方案的经验。方法:在2021年5月至2023年10月期间,患者在我们的同日计划中接受基于linac的SRS/SBRT治疗。每周提供两个名额。考虑具有快速临床需求,能够进行SRS/SBRT模拟和治疗的患者。颅外治疗需要满足自动调强放射治疗(IMRT)优化的标准。颅内治疗仅限于1-3个病灶和1-2个等中心。在治疗前一天,需要对患者进行识别,并提供任何诊断成像,以便医生和剂量师讨论治疗计划。治疗当天,模拟时间默认为上午8点,治疗时间默认为下午4点,目标为下午6点完成治疗。我们分析了每个病人的治疗计划和工作流程中每个步骤所花费的时间。结果:97例患者遵循我们的当日工作流程并被纳入分析。75例患者接受颅内SRS(57%对1个病变),22例患者接受颅外治疗(50%对四肢)。模拟通常需要额外的时间来完成,在目标结束时间后完成平均18分钟(IQR 5-40)。模拟完成和当天治疗结束之间的中位时间为7.8小时(IQR 7.4-8.6)。处理技术和目标体积数量对规划时间有显著影响。中位治疗结束时间为下午5:13 (IQR为下午4:46 -6:01),74%的患者在下午6点结束。结论:建立了一个基于linac的快速治疗SRS/SBRT患者的方案,并在同一天的时间内成功治疗了患者。在开发快速工作流时,仔细选择计划技术来限制计划的复杂性,并在耗时的过程部分添加自动化是至关重要的。
{"title":"Clinical experience with a same-day simulation and treatment program for stereotactic radiation therapy on a C-arm linac","authors":"Michalis Aristophanous,&nbsp;Sernger Shen,&nbsp;Dylan G. Hsu,&nbsp;Dongxu Wang,&nbsp;Ase Ballangrud,&nbsp;Jean M. Moran,&nbsp;Anyi Li,&nbsp;Sean M. McBride,&nbsp;Daniel Gomez,&nbsp;Luke R. G. Pike,&nbsp;Kathryn Beal,&nbsp;Jonathan T. Yang,&nbsp;Laura Cervino","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70449","DOIUrl":"10.1002/acm2.70449","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We report our experience with the implementation of a same-day simulation and treatment C-arm linear accelerator (linac)-based stereotactic program for patients with intracranial and extracranial metastatic disease.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Between May 2021 and October 2023, patients were treated in our same-day program with linac-based SRS/SBRT. Two slots per week were offered. Patients with expedited clinical needs, able to undergo SRS/SBRT simulation and treatment, were considered. Extracranial treatments were required to meet standards for automated intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) optimization. Intracranial treatments were limited to 1–3 lesions and 1–2 isocenters. The day before treatment, the patient needed to be identified, and any diagnostic imaging had to be available for the physician and dosimetrist to discuss the plan. On the day of treatment, simulation was scheduled for 8 AM and treatment at 4 PM by default, with the goal to complete treatment by 6 PM. We analyzed information about each patient's treatment plan and time spent on each step of the workflow.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Ninety-seven patients followed our same-day workflow and were included in the analysis. Seventy-five patients received intracranial SRS (57% to 1 lesion), while 22 patients received extracranial treatments (50% to the extremities). Simulation often required additional time to be completed, finishing a median 18 min (IQR 5–40) after the goal end time. The median time between simulation completion and end of the same-day treatment was 7.8 h (IQR 7.4–8.6). Treatment technique and the number of target volumes had a significant impact on planning time. The median treatment end time was 5:13 PM (IQR 4:46 PM–6:01 PM), with 74% ending by 6 PM.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A linac-based program to treat patients with SRS/SBRT in an expedited fashion was established and successfully treated patients in a same-day timeline. Careful selection of planning techniques to limit plan complexity and adding automation in time-consuming parts of the process are crucial when developing expedited workflows.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12758992/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145892485","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1