The intention-to-treat effect of changes in planned participation on injury risk in adolescent ice hockey players: A target trial emulation

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of science and medicine in sport Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jsams.2024.09.007
Chinchin Wang , Paul Eliason , Jean-Michel Galarneau , Carolyn A. Emery , Sabrina Yusuf , Russell J. Steele , Jay S. Kaufman , Ian Shrier
{"title":"The intention-to-treat effect of changes in planned participation on injury risk in adolescent ice hockey players: A target trial emulation","authors":"Chinchin Wang ,&nbsp;Paul Eliason ,&nbsp;Jean-Michel Galarneau ,&nbsp;Carolyn A. Emery ,&nbsp;Sabrina Yusuf ,&nbsp;Russell J. Steele ,&nbsp;Jay S. Kaufman ,&nbsp;Ian Shrier","doi":"10.1016/j.jsams.2024.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Target trial emulation is a framework for conducting causal inference using observational data. We employ this framework to estimate the effect of changing planned participation duration, measured using the acute:chronic workload ratio (ACWR), on injury risk among adolescent ice hockey players without recent injuries.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Prospective cohort study designed to emulate a hypothetical randomized trial.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used data from a 5-year cohort study (2013–2018) of ice hockey players aged 13–17 years in Alberta and British Columbia. We estimated injury risks associated with different planned changes in hockey participation duration (e.g. half [ACWR = 0.5], no change [ACWR = 1], two-fold [ACWR = 2], three-fold [ACWR = 3], and five-fold [ACWR = 5]) relative to participation in the previous 4 weeks. Outcomes were modeled using generalized additive models. We conducted secondary analyses restricted to concussions, and stratified by league bodychecking status.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 2633 eligible participants, contributing 115,821 player-trials. Injury risk was 1.9 % (95 % CI: 1.7 %–2.3 %) for no change in participation (ACWR = 1). Injury risk ratios (RRs) were 0.43 at ACWR = 0.5 (95 % CI: 0.31–0.54), 1.62 (95 % CI: 1.33–1.98) at ACWR = 2, 1.91 at ACWR = 3 (95 % CI: 1.52–2.48) and 2.35 at ACWR = 5 (95 % CI: 1.68–3.26). Patterns were similar by league bodychecking status. Concussion RRs were stable between ACWR = 1 and 1.5, but RRs were greater than for any injury past ACWR = 2.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Within the assumptions of this target trial emulation, injury risk increases consistently (no sweet spots) for increases in planned changes in participation duration relative to the previous 4 weeks among adolescent ice hockey players without recent injuries. Injuries in injury risk are less than expected for the increased exposure time at risk, suggesting beneficial effects of increasing participation that partially counteract the increased exposure time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of science and medicine in sport","volume":"28 2","pages":"Pages 132-139"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of science and medicine in sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1440244024005243","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Target trial emulation is a framework for conducting causal inference using observational data. We employ this framework to estimate the effect of changing planned participation duration, measured using the acute:chronic workload ratio (ACWR), on injury risk among adolescent ice hockey players without recent injuries.

Design

Prospective cohort study designed to emulate a hypothetical randomized trial.

Methods

We used data from a 5-year cohort study (2013–2018) of ice hockey players aged 13–17 years in Alberta and British Columbia. We estimated injury risks associated with different planned changes in hockey participation duration (e.g. half [ACWR = 0.5], no change [ACWR = 1], two-fold [ACWR = 2], three-fold [ACWR = 3], and five-fold [ACWR = 5]) relative to participation in the previous 4 weeks. Outcomes were modeled using generalized additive models. We conducted secondary analyses restricted to concussions, and stratified by league bodychecking status.

Results

There were 2633 eligible participants, contributing 115,821 player-trials. Injury risk was 1.9 % (95 % CI: 1.7 %–2.3 %) for no change in participation (ACWR = 1). Injury risk ratios (RRs) were 0.43 at ACWR = 0.5 (95 % CI: 0.31–0.54), 1.62 (95 % CI: 1.33–1.98) at ACWR = 2, 1.91 at ACWR = 3 (95 % CI: 1.52–2.48) and 2.35 at ACWR = 5 (95 % CI: 1.68–3.26). Patterns were similar by league bodychecking status. Concussion RRs were stable between ACWR = 1 and 1.5, but RRs were greater than for any injury past ACWR = 2.

Conclusions

Within the assumptions of this target trial emulation, injury risk increases consistently (no sweet spots) for increases in planned changes in participation duration relative to the previous 4 weeks among adolescent ice hockey players without recent injuries. Injuries in injury risk are less than expected for the increased exposure time at risk, suggesting beneficial effects of increasing participation that partially counteract the increased exposure time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年冰上曲棍球运动员参与计划的变化对受伤风险的意向治疗效果:目标试验模拟
目标:目标试验模拟是一种利用观察数据进行因果推断的框架。我们利用这一框架来估算改变计划参与时间对近期未受伤的青少年冰上曲棍球运动员受伤风险的影响:前瞻性队列研究,旨在模拟假设的随机试验:我们使用了艾伯塔省和不列颠哥伦比亚省 13-17 岁冰上曲棍球运动员的 5 年队列研究(2013-2018 年)数据。我们估算了与前 4 周冰球运动参与时间不同的计划变化(如一半[ACWR = 0.5]、无变化[ACWR = 1]、两倍[ACWR = 2]、三倍[ACWR = 3]和五倍[ACWR = 5])相关的受伤风险。结果采用广义加法模型进行建模。我们进行了仅限于脑震荡的二次分析,并根据联赛身体检查状况进行了分层:共有 2633 名符合条件的参与者,参与了 115,821 次球员试训。在参赛人数不变的情况下(ACWR = 1),受伤风险为 1.9 %(95 % CI:1.7 %-2.3 %)。在 ACWR = 0.5 时,受伤风险比为 0.43(95 % CI:0.31-0.54);在 ACWR = 2 时,受伤风险比为 1.62(95 % CI:1.33-1.98);在 ACWR = 3 时,受伤风险比为 1.91(95 % CI:1.52-2.48);在 ACWR = 5 时,受伤风险比为 2.35(95 % CI:1.68-3.26)。不同联赛的身体检查情况也有相似之处。脑震荡死亡率在 ACWR = 1 和 1.5 之间保持稳定,但在 ACWR = 2.结论之后,脑震荡死亡率高于任何伤害:在目标试验的假设范围内,在最近没有受过伤的青少年冰上曲棍球运动员中,相对于之前的4周,参与时间的计划变化增加,受伤风险也会持续增加(没有甜蜜点)。受伤风险的增加低于风险暴露时间增加的预期,这表明增加参与的有益效果部分抵消了暴露时间的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport is the official journal of Sports Medicine Australia (SMA) and is an an international refereed research publication covering all aspects of sport science and medicine. The Journal considers for publication Original research and Review papers in the sub-disciplines relating generally to the broad sports medicine and sports science fields: sports medicine, sports injury (including injury epidemiology and injury prevention), physiotherapy, podiatry, physical activity and health, sports science, biomechanics, exercise physiology, motor control and learning, sport and exercise psychology, sports nutrition, public health (as relevant to sport and exercise), and rehabilitation and injury management. Manuscripts with an interdisciplinary perspective with specific applications to sport and exercise and its interaction with health will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
The effects of COVID-19 on professional football: Clinical management, player performance, and vaccination impact. Editorial Board Sex-dependent responses to acute sodium bicarbonate different dose treatment: A randomized double-blind crossover study Exercise and Sports Science Australia updated position statement on exercise for preventing falls in older people living in the community The HAPPY concept mapping study: “To prevent injuries in young handball players it's important to…” – Perceptions among stakeholders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1