Updated 5-Year Institutional Bibliometric Profiles for United States Neurosurgery Residency Programs and the Relationship Between Social Media Presence and Objective Departmental Metrics.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1227/neu.0000000000003256
Andrew N Chang, Deborah Boyett, Dean Chou, Andrew K Chan
{"title":"Updated 5-Year Institutional Bibliometric Profiles for United States Neurosurgery Residency Programs and the Relationship Between Social Media Presence and Objective Departmental Metrics.","authors":"Andrew N Chang, Deborah Boyett, Dean Chou, Andrew K Chan","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The authors report current 3-year and 5-year institutional bibliometric profiles and investigate the correlations between objective metrics of neurosurgical residency programs and social media presence, including residency program size, faculty count, Doximity rankings, and measures of research output.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A list of neurosurgery residency programs was obtained through the Doximity Residency Navigator. Publication history of faculty members was compiled using Scopus and analyzed to create institutional bibliometric profiles from 2018-2022 to 2020-2022. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare departmental metrics for institutions with and without social media accounts. Spearman rank correlations were used to examine the relationship between social media following and metrics, and between Twitter following and methods of Twitter use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>74% (n = 86) of neurosurgery programs have a Twitter account, 47% (n = 55) have a Facebook account, 63% (n = 73) have Instagram accounts, and 16% (n = 19) have LinkedIn accounts. The most notable differences were found when comparing departments with and without Twitter accounts, where a difference was found in all metrics except the average H-index. Residency program size, faculty count, average H-index, 3-year and 5-year publication and citation counts per faculty, and institutional H-indices were significantly correlated with Twitter following. Higher Doximity rankings were correlated with Twitter following and Facebook likes. There is a greater increase in 5-year citations per publication from 2009-2013 to 2018-2022 for institutions that created departmental Twitter accounts after 2013. Articles that were tweeted about had higher 3-year citations per publication than the institution's overall 3-year citations per publication.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings provide updated insight into the relationship between social media presence and objective academic metrics of neurosurgery departments. We identify and quantify correlations between social media platforms and program characteristics, with a focus on research output. These metrics can be used to guide programs in their development of social media.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003256","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: The authors report current 3-year and 5-year institutional bibliometric profiles and investigate the correlations between objective metrics of neurosurgical residency programs and social media presence, including residency program size, faculty count, Doximity rankings, and measures of research output.

Methods: A list of neurosurgery residency programs was obtained through the Doximity Residency Navigator. Publication history of faculty members was compiled using Scopus and analyzed to create institutional bibliometric profiles from 2018-2022 to 2020-2022. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare departmental metrics for institutions with and without social media accounts. Spearman rank correlations were used to examine the relationship between social media following and metrics, and between Twitter following and methods of Twitter use.

Results: 74% (n = 86) of neurosurgery programs have a Twitter account, 47% (n = 55) have a Facebook account, 63% (n = 73) have Instagram accounts, and 16% (n = 19) have LinkedIn accounts. The most notable differences were found when comparing departments with and without Twitter accounts, where a difference was found in all metrics except the average H-index. Residency program size, faculty count, average H-index, 3-year and 5-year publication and citation counts per faculty, and institutional H-indices were significantly correlated with Twitter following. Higher Doximity rankings were correlated with Twitter following and Facebook likes. There is a greater increase in 5-year citations per publication from 2009-2013 to 2018-2022 for institutions that created departmental Twitter accounts after 2013. Articles that were tweeted about had higher 3-year citations per publication than the institution's overall 3-year citations per publication.

Conclusion: Our findings provide updated insight into the relationship between social media presence and objective academic metrics of neurosurgery departments. We identify and quantify correlations between social media platforms and program characteristics, with a focus on research output. These metrics can be used to guide programs in their development of social media.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国神经外科住院医师项目的最新五年机构文献计量概况以及社交媒体存在与客观部门指标之间的关系。
背景和目的:作者报告了当前3年和5年的机构文献计量概况,并调查了神经外科住院医师项目的客观指标与社交媒体存在之间的相关性,包括住院医师项目的规模、教师人数、Doximity排名以及研究产出的衡量标准:方法:通过 Doximity Residency Navigator 获取神经外科住院医师培训项目列表。使用Scopus汇编了教职员工的发表历史,并对其进行分析,以创建2018-2022年至2020-2022年的机构文献计量概况。Mann-Whitney U 检验用于比较有社交媒体账户和没有社交媒体账户的机构的部门指标。斯皮尔曼等级相关性用于检验社交媒体关注度与指标之间的关系,以及推特关注度与推特使用方法之间的关系:74%(n = 86)的神经外科项目拥有 Twitter 帐户,47%(n = 55)拥有 Facebook 帐户,63%(n = 73)拥有 Instagram 帐户,16%(n = 19)拥有 LinkedIn 帐户。有 Twitter 账户和没有 Twitter 账户的科室之间的差异最为明显,除平均 H 指数外,其他指标均存在差异。住院医师项目规模、教师人数、平均H指数、每位教师3年和5年的发表文章和引用次数以及机构H指数都与Twitter关注度有显著相关。较高的 Doximity 排名与 Twitter 关注度和 Facebook 点赞数相关。从2009-2013年到2018-2022年,在2013年后创建部门推特账户的机构,每篇论文的5年被引次数增幅更大。被推特关注的文章每篇出版物的3年被引次数高于该机构每篇出版物的总体3年被引次数:我们的研究结果为神经外科部门社交媒体存在与客观学术指标之间的关系提供了最新见解。我们确定并量化了社交媒体平台与项目特征之间的相关性,重点关注研究成果。这些指标可用于指导项目发展社交媒体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
898
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
期刊最新文献
Commentary: Vestibular Schwannoma Koos Grade 1 International Study of Active Surveillance Versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery: The VISAS-K1 Study. Vestibular Schwannoma Koos Grade I International Study of Active Surveillance Versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery: The VISAS-K1 Study. Vestibular Schwannoma Koos Grade II International Study of Active Surveillance Versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery: The VISAS-K2 Study. Clinical Benefits of Photodynamic Therapy Using Talaporfin Sodium in Patients With Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-Wildtype Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Retrospective Study of 100 Cases. Dynamic Craniotomy With Khanna NuCrani Plates as an Alternative to Craniotomy With Fixed Plates in Traumatic Brain Injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1