Microbiological aspects and clinical impact of lower lung field tuberculosis: An observational cohort study in Peru.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES International Journal of Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2024.107284
Qi Tan, Chuan-Chin Huang, Roger Calderon, Leonid Lecca, Milagros Mendoza, Gabriela Reyes Rocha, Karen Tintaya, Ximena Tovar, Jia-Yih Feng, Sheng-Wei Pan, Yen-Han Tseng, Jhong-Ru Huang, Zibiao Zhang, Megan B Murray
{"title":"Microbiological aspects and clinical impact of lower lung field tuberculosis: An observational cohort study in Peru.","authors":"Qi Tan, Chuan-Chin Huang, Roger Calderon, Leonid Lecca, Milagros Mendoza, Gabriela Reyes Rocha, Karen Tintaya, Ximena Tovar, Jia-Yih Feng, Sheng-Wei Pan, Yen-Han Tseng, Jhong-Ru Huang, Zibiao Zhang, Megan B Murray","doi":"10.1016/j.ijid.2024.107284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Approximately 40% of tuberculosis (TB) cases remain undiagnosed globally. Lower lung field TB (LLF TB) presents atypically and is often misidentified as other lung diseases, leading to diagnostic delays in resource-limited settings. It may contribute to increased TB transmission and mortality. We aimed to identify microbiological determinants of LLF TB and evaluate treatment responses to optimize care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational cohort study in Lima, Peru, enrolling adults with microbiologically confirmed pulmonary TB (PTB) diagnosed by GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay or sputum culture. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) lineage was determined using whole-genome sequencing. Due to the delayed chest radiograph changes in LLF TB compared to non-LLF TB, we measured changes in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score at 2-month treatment mark and evaluated World Health Organization-specified final treatment outcomes. We used logistic regression to evaluate the associations between LLF TB and microbiological determinants and treatment outcomes. We used linear regression to assess whether the change in SGRQ scores over the first 2 months of treatment varied by LLF TB status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1316 PTB patients, 84 (6%) had LLF TB. Compared to non-LLF TB patients, LLF TB patients were more likely to be smear-negative (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] [95% CI] = 2.04 [1.28-3.23], P = 0.002) and to be infected with Lineage 2 (aOR [95% CI] = 1.95 [95% CI: 1.07-3.41; P = 0.024]). People with LLF TB had less improvement in SGRQ scores after 2 months of treatment (adjusted score difference [95% CI] = -6.29 [-10.99 to -1.59], P = 0.009), while they experienced better final outcomes compared to non-LLF TB patients, though this difference did not reach statistical significance (aOR = 0.43 [95% CI: 0.13-1.05], P = 0.103).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with LLF TB are more likely than those with upper lung lesions to be sputum-negative on conventional tests, to be infected with Lineage 2, and to show less clinical improvement after treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14006,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"107284"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2024.107284","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Approximately 40% of tuberculosis (TB) cases remain undiagnosed globally. Lower lung field TB (LLF TB) presents atypically and is often misidentified as other lung diseases, leading to diagnostic delays in resource-limited settings. It may contribute to increased TB transmission and mortality. We aimed to identify microbiological determinants of LLF TB and evaluate treatment responses to optimize care.

Methods: We conducted an observational cohort study in Lima, Peru, enrolling adults with microbiologically confirmed pulmonary TB (PTB) diagnosed by GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay or sputum culture. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) lineage was determined using whole-genome sequencing. Due to the delayed chest radiograph changes in LLF TB compared to non-LLF TB, we measured changes in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score at 2-month treatment mark and evaluated World Health Organization-specified final treatment outcomes. We used logistic regression to evaluate the associations between LLF TB and microbiological determinants and treatment outcomes. We used linear regression to assess whether the change in SGRQ scores over the first 2 months of treatment varied by LLF TB status.

Results: Among 1316 PTB patients, 84 (6%) had LLF TB. Compared to non-LLF TB patients, LLF TB patients were more likely to be smear-negative (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] [95% CI] = 2.04 [1.28-3.23], P = 0.002) and to be infected with Lineage 2 (aOR [95% CI] = 1.95 [95% CI: 1.07-3.41; P = 0.024]). People with LLF TB had less improvement in SGRQ scores after 2 months of treatment (adjusted score difference [95% CI] = -6.29 [-10.99 to -1.59], P = 0.009), while they experienced better final outcomes compared to non-LLF TB patients, though this difference did not reach statistical significance (aOR = 0.43 [95% CI: 0.13-1.05], P = 0.103).

Conclusion: Patients with LLF TB are more likely than those with upper lung lesions to be sputum-negative on conventional tests, to be infected with Lineage 2, and to show less clinical improvement after treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下肺野肺结核的微生物学方面和临床影响:秘鲁的一项观察性队列研究。
目标:全球约有 40% 的结核病(TB)病例仍未得到诊断。下肺野结核(LLF TB)表现不典型,经常被误诊为其他肺部疾病,导致在资源有限的环境中诊断延误。它可能导致结核病传播率和死亡率上升。我们旨在确定 LLF 型肺结核的微生物学决定因素,并评估治疗反应以优化护理:我们在秘鲁利马开展了一项观察性队列研究,纳入了经 GeneXpert MTB/RIF 检测或痰培养确诊的微生物学确诊肺结核(PTB)成人患者。通过全基因组测序(WGS)确定了结核分枝杆菌(MTB)的血统。与非 LLF TB 相比,LLF TB 的胸片(CXR)变化较晚,因此我们测量了治疗两个月后圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评分的变化,并评估了世界卫生组织(WHO)规定的最终治疗结果。我们采用逻辑回归法评估 LLF TB 与微生物决定因素和治疗结果之间的关联。我们使用线性回归评估了治疗头两个月的 SGRQ 分数变化是否因 LLF TB 状态而异:在 1316 名 PTB 患者中,84 人(6%)患有 LLF TB。与非LLF肺结核患者相比,LLF肺结核患者更有可能涂片阴性(调整后的几率比[aOR] [95% CI]=2.04[1.28-3.23],p=0.002)和感染2号线(aOR [95% CI]= 1.95 (95% CI: 1.07 to 3.41; p=0.024))。与非LLF肺结核患者相比,LLF肺结核患者在治疗两个月后的SGRQ评分改善较少(调整后的评分差异[95% CI] = -6.29 [-10.99 to -1.59], p = 0.009),但他们的最终结果较好,尽管这一差异未达到统计学意义(调整后的几率比[aOR] = 0.43 [95% CI: 0.13 to 1.05], p = 0.103):结论:LLF 型肺结核患者比上肺部病变患者更有可能在常规检测中痰液阴性,更有可能感染 2 号染色体,而且治疗后的临床改善程度更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
1020
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Infectious Diseases (IJID) Publisher: International Society for Infectious Diseases Publication Frequency: Monthly Type: Peer-reviewed, Open Access Scope: Publishes original clinical and laboratory-based research. Reports clinical trials, reviews, and some case reports. Focuses on epidemiology, clinical diagnosis, treatment, and control of infectious diseases. Emphasizes diseases common in under-resourced countries.
期刊最新文献
Microbiological aspects and clinical impact of lower lung field tuberculosis: An observational cohort study in Peru. Is intestinal colonization with multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales associated with higher rates of nosocomial Enterobacterales bloodstream infections? Relative efficacy of anti-Plasmodium vivax malaria combination drugs in preventing transmission to two major Anopheles mosquitoes in the first few days of treatment. Evaluating a rapid molecular assay in a mobile laboratory for improved diagnosis of dengue in Bangladesh. Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 3 to 12 months after infection: Delta vs Omicron.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1