A systematic review of educational interventions to enhance cancer awareness and screening in individuals with intellectual disabilities: A mixed-methods approach
{"title":"A systematic review of educational interventions to enhance cancer awareness and screening in individuals with intellectual disabilities: A mixed-methods approach","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cancer awareness and screening among individuals with intellectual disabilities face unique challenges. To bridge this gap, educational interventions have been developed.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>This review comprehensively analyzes educational interventions aimed at enhancing cancer awareness among individuals with intellectual disabilities (IDs). It addresses key questions regarding intervention types and effectiveness, influencing factors, and recommendations for impactful programs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and procedures</h3><div>A robust search strategy was deployed across reputable databases yielding 2512 articles. After meticulous screening and eligibility assessments, eight studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing qualitative research, a feasibility study, and randomized control trials.</div></div><div><h3>Outcomes and results</h3><div>The studies employed diverse interventions and assessment methods, leading to varying outcomes. Interventions included educational materials, communication packs, health education DVDs, and healthcare professional support, typically delivered over a short period with limited follow-up. Assessment methods comprised surveys, interviews, and knowledge surveys. However, a comprehensive evaluation of knowledge gains and screening uptake was often absent. While some studies reported modest increases in knowledge, none measured actual screening uptake and long-term effects. The strengths and limitations of these studies underscore the need for more comprehensive research in this area, considering factors such as sample size, study design, and long-term impact.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and implications</h3><div>In conclusion, this review provides valuable insights into educational interventions for cancer awareness among individuals with intellectual disabilities. Its comprehensive methodology and findings underscore the significance of tailoring interventions, extending their duration, and involving caregivers to optimize outcomes for this vulnerable population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422224001999","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Cancer awareness and screening among individuals with intellectual disabilities face unique challenges. To bridge this gap, educational interventions have been developed.
Aims
This review comprehensively analyzes educational interventions aimed at enhancing cancer awareness among individuals with intellectual disabilities (IDs). It addresses key questions regarding intervention types and effectiveness, influencing factors, and recommendations for impactful programs.
Methods and procedures
A robust search strategy was deployed across reputable databases yielding 2512 articles. After meticulous screening and eligibility assessments, eight studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing qualitative research, a feasibility study, and randomized control trials.
Outcomes and results
The studies employed diverse interventions and assessment methods, leading to varying outcomes. Interventions included educational materials, communication packs, health education DVDs, and healthcare professional support, typically delivered over a short period with limited follow-up. Assessment methods comprised surveys, interviews, and knowledge surveys. However, a comprehensive evaluation of knowledge gains and screening uptake was often absent. While some studies reported modest increases in knowledge, none measured actual screening uptake and long-term effects. The strengths and limitations of these studies underscore the need for more comprehensive research in this area, considering factors such as sample size, study design, and long-term impact.
Conclusion and implications
In conclusion, this review provides valuable insights into educational interventions for cancer awareness among individuals with intellectual disabilities. Its comprehensive methodology and findings underscore the significance of tailoring interventions, extending their duration, and involving caregivers to optimize outcomes for this vulnerable population.
期刊介绍：
Research In Developmental Disabilities is aimed at publishing original research of an interdisciplinary nature that has a direct bearing on the remediation of problems associated with developmental disabilities. Manuscripts will be solicited throughout the world. Articles will be primarily empirical studies, although an occasional position paper or review will be accepted. The aim of the journal will be to publish articles on all aspects of research with the developmentally disabled, with any methodologically sound approach being acceptable.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
