Paul N Zivich, Rachael K Ross, Bonnie E Shook-Sa, Stephen R Cole, Jessie K Edwards
{"title":"Empirical Sandwich Variance Estimator for Iterated Conditional Expectation g-Computation.","authors":"Paul N Zivich, Rachael K Ross, Bonnie E Shook-Sa, Stephen R Cole, Jessie K Edwards","doi":"10.1002/sim.10255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Iterated conditional expectation (ICE) g-computation is an estimation approach for addressing time-varying confounding for both longitudinal and time-to-event data. Unlike other g-computation implementations, ICE avoids the need to specify models for each time-varying covariate. For variance estimation, previous work has suggested the bootstrap. However, bootstrapping can be computationally intense. Here, we present ICE g-computation as a set of stacked estimating equations. Therefore, the variance for the ICE g-computation estimator can be consistently estimated using the empirical sandwich variance estimator. Performance of the variance estimator was evaluated empirically with a simulation study. The proposed approach is also demonstrated with an illustrative example on the effect of cigarette smoking on the prevalence of hypertension. In the simulation study, the empirical sandwich variance estimator appropriately estimated the variance. When comparing runtimes between the sandwich variance estimator and the bootstrap for the applied example, the sandwich estimator was substantially faster, even when bootstraps were run in parallel. The empirical sandwich variance estimator is a viable option for variance estimation with ICE g-computation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21879,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"5562-5572"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.10255","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Iterated conditional expectation (ICE) g-computation is an estimation approach for addressing time-varying confounding for both longitudinal and time-to-event data. Unlike other g-computation implementations, ICE avoids the need to specify models for each time-varying covariate. For variance estimation, previous work has suggested the bootstrap. However, bootstrapping can be computationally intense. Here, we present ICE g-computation as a set of stacked estimating equations. Therefore, the variance for the ICE g-computation estimator can be consistently estimated using the empirical sandwich variance estimator. Performance of the variance estimator was evaluated empirically with a simulation study. The proposed approach is also demonstrated with an illustrative example on the effect of cigarette smoking on the prevalence of hypertension. In the simulation study, the empirical sandwich variance estimator appropriately estimated the variance. When comparing runtimes between the sandwich variance estimator and the bootstrap for the applied example, the sandwich estimator was substantially faster, even when bootstraps were run in parallel. The empirical sandwich variance estimator is a viable option for variance estimation with ICE g-computation.
迭代条件期望(ICE)g-计算是一种估计方法,用于解决纵向数据和时间到事件数据的时变混杂问题。与其他 g 计算实现不同的是,ICE 无需为每个时变协变量指定模型。对于方差估计,以前的工作建议使用引导法。然而,自举法的计算量很大。在这里,我们将 ICE g 计算作为一组堆叠估计方程。因此,ICE g 计算估计器的方差可以使用经验三明治方差估计器进行一致估计。我们通过模拟研究对方差估计器的性能进行了经验评估。此外,还以吸烟对高血压患病率的影响为例,演示了所提出的方法。在模拟研究中,经验夹心方差估计器恰当地估计了方差。在比较三明治方差估计器和自举法在应用实例中的运行时间时,三明治估计器的速度要快得多,即使在并行运行自举法时也是如此。经验三明治方差估计器是利用 ICE g 计算进行方差估计的可行选择。
期刊介绍:
The journal aims to influence practice in medicine and its associated sciences through the publication of papers on statistical and other quantitative methods. Papers will explain new methods and demonstrate their application, preferably through a substantive, real, motivating example or a comprehensive evaluation based on an illustrative example. Alternatively, papers will report on case-studies where creative use or technical generalizations of established methodology is directed towards a substantive application. Reviews of, and tutorials on, general topics relevant to the application of statistics to medicine will also be published. The main criteria for publication are appropriateness of the statistical methods to a particular medical problem and clarity of exposition. Papers with primarily mathematical content will be excluded. The journal aims to enhance communication between statisticians, clinicians and medical researchers.