Reverse Time-to-Death as Time-Scale in Time-to-Event Analysis for Studies of Advanced Illness and Palliative Care.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY Statistics in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1002/sim.10338
Yin Bun Cheung, Xiangmei Ma, Isha Chaudhry, Nan Liu, Qingyuan Zhuang, Grace Meijuan Yang, Chetna Malhotra, Eric Andrew Finkelstein
{"title":"Reverse Time-to-Death as Time-Scale in Time-to-Event Analysis for Studies of Advanced Illness and Palliative Care.","authors":"Yin Bun Cheung, Xiangmei Ma, Isha Chaudhry, Nan Liu, Qingyuan Zhuang, Grace Meijuan Yang, Chetna Malhotra, Eric Andrew Finkelstein","doi":"10.1002/sim.10338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Incidence of adverse outcome events rises as patients with advanced illness approach end-of-life. Exposures that tend to occur near end-of-life, for example, use of wheelchair, oxygen therapy and palliative care, may therefore be found associated with the incidence of the adverse outcomes. We propose a concept of reverse time-to-death (rTTD) and its use for the time-scale in time-to-event analysis based on partial likelihood to mitigate the time-varying confounding. We used data on community-based palliative care uptake (exposure) and emergency department visits (outcome) among patients with advanced cancer in Singapore to illustrate. We compare the results against that of the common practice of using time-on-study (TOS) as time-scale. Graphical analysis demonstrated that cancer patients receiving palliative care had higher rate of emergency department visits than non-recipients mainly because they were closer to end-of-life, and that rTTD analysis made comparison between patients at the same time-to-death. In analysis of a decedent cohort, emergency department visits in relation to palliative care using TOS time-scale showed significant increase in hazard ratio estimate when observed time-varying covariates were omitted from statistical adjustment (% change-in-estimate = 16.2%; 95% CI 6.4% to 25.6%). There was no such change in otherwise the same analysis using rTTD (% change-in-estimate = 3.1%; 95% CI -1.0% to 8.5%), demonstrating the ability of rTTD time-scale to mitigate confounding that intensifies in relation to time-to-death. A similar pattern was found in the full cohort. Simulations demonstrated that the proposed method had smaller relative bias and root mean square error than TOS-based analysis. In conclusion, use of rTTD as time-scale in time-to-event analysis provides a simple and robust approach to control time-varying confounding in studies of advanced illness, even if the confounders are unmeasured.</p>","PeriodicalId":21879,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Medicine","volume":"44 3-4","pages":"e10338"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.10338","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Incidence of adverse outcome events rises as patients with advanced illness approach end-of-life. Exposures that tend to occur near end-of-life, for example, use of wheelchair, oxygen therapy and palliative care, may therefore be found associated with the incidence of the adverse outcomes. We propose a concept of reverse time-to-death (rTTD) and its use for the time-scale in time-to-event analysis based on partial likelihood to mitigate the time-varying confounding. We used data on community-based palliative care uptake (exposure) and emergency department visits (outcome) among patients with advanced cancer in Singapore to illustrate. We compare the results against that of the common practice of using time-on-study (TOS) as time-scale. Graphical analysis demonstrated that cancer patients receiving palliative care had higher rate of emergency department visits than non-recipients mainly because they were closer to end-of-life, and that rTTD analysis made comparison between patients at the same time-to-death. In analysis of a decedent cohort, emergency department visits in relation to palliative care using TOS time-scale showed significant increase in hazard ratio estimate when observed time-varying covariates were omitted from statistical adjustment (% change-in-estimate = 16.2%; 95% CI 6.4% to 25.6%). There was no such change in otherwise the same analysis using rTTD (% change-in-estimate = 3.1%; 95% CI -1.0% to 8.5%), demonstrating the ability of rTTD time-scale to mitigate confounding that intensifies in relation to time-to-death. A similar pattern was found in the full cohort. Simulations demonstrated that the proposed method had smaller relative bias and root mean square error than TOS-based analysis. In conclusion, use of rTTD as time-scale in time-to-event analysis provides a simple and robust approach to control time-varying confounding in studies of advanced illness, even if the confounders are unmeasured.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在晚期疾病和姑息治疗研究的时间到事件分析中,反向死亡时间作为时间尺度。
随着晚期疾病患者接近生命末期,不良后果事件的发生率上升。因此,可能发现往往发生在生命末期的暴露,例如使用轮椅、氧气治疗和姑息治疗,与不良后果的发生率有关。我们提出了反向死亡时间(rTTD)的概念,并将其用于基于部分似然的时间到事件分析中的时间尺度,以减轻时变混淆。我们使用新加坡晚期癌症患者社区姑息治疗接受(暴露)和急诊科就诊(结果)的数据来说明。我们将结果与使用学习时间(TOS)作为时间尺度的常见做法进行比较。图形分析表明,接受姑息治疗的癌症患者急诊科就诊率高于未接受姑息治疗的癌症患者,主要原因是他们更接近生命末期,rTTD分析在同一死亡时间对患者进行了比较。在对死者队列的分析中,使用TOS时间尺度的急诊科就诊与姑息治疗相关,当统计调整中忽略观察到的时变协变量时,风险比估计值显着增加(估计值变化% = 16.2%;95%可信区间6.4%至25.6%)。在使用rTTD的其他相同分析中没有这种变化(估计变化% = 3.1%;95% CI -1.0% - 8.5%),表明rTTD时间尺度能够减轻与死亡时间相关的混杂因素。在整个队列中也发现了类似的模式。仿真结果表明,该方法具有较小的相对偏差和均方根误差。总之,在时间到事件分析中,使用rTTD作为时间尺度提供了一种简单而稳健的方法来控制晚期疾病研究中的时变混杂,即使这些混杂因素是无法测量的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Statistics in Medicine
Statistics in Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal aims to influence practice in medicine and its associated sciences through the publication of papers on statistical and other quantitative methods. Papers will explain new methods and demonstrate their application, preferably through a substantive, real, motivating example or a comprehensive evaluation based on an illustrative example. Alternatively, papers will report on case-studies where creative use or technical generalizations of established methodology is directed towards a substantive application. Reviews of, and tutorials on, general topics relevant to the application of statistics to medicine will also be published. The main criteria for publication are appropriateness of the statistical methods to a particular medical problem and clarity of exposition. Papers with primarily mathematical content will be excluded. The journal aims to enhance communication between statisticians, clinicians and medical researchers.
期刊最新文献
Using Propensity Score Weighting With Clustered Data When the Treatment Is Applied at the Level of the Cluster and Outcomes Are Assessed at the Level of the Individual: The Observational Analog of Cluster Randomization Trials. Wasserstein Boxplots for the Analysis of EEG Power Spectral Densities With Applications to Autism. Randomization-Based Covariance Analysis for Confidence Intervals of Treatment Comparisons Based on Restricted Mean Survival Time With Categorized Time-to-Event Data. Time-Varying Hormonal Treatment and Metastasis-Free Survival Among ER+ Breast Cancer Patients: A Natural History Modelling Approach. Bayesian Hierarchical Models With Calibrated Mixtures of g-priors for Assessing Treatment Effect Moderation in Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1