Biological Variation of Hemostasis Analytes in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Using Dabigatran.

IF 1.8 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1093/jalm/jfae116
Martijn J Tilly, Samantha J Donkel, Maryam Kavousi, Natasja M S de Groot, Moniek P M de Maat
{"title":"Biological Variation of Hemostasis Analytes in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Using Dabigatran.","authors":"Martijn J Tilly, Samantha J Donkel, Maryam Kavousi, Natasja M S de Groot, Moniek P M de Maat","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfae116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Analytical criteria for laboratory analysis based on biological variation are considered state-of-the-art. While biological variance should ideally be measured in patient populations for whom the tests are relevant, data are mostly only available from healthy individuals. We determined the biological variance of activated partial thromboplasmin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), fibrinogen, and trough dabigatran levels in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who were treated with dabigatran.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2019 and 2022, patients with AF treated >3 months with dabigatran were included. Blood was collected monthly up to 10 times for the measurement of APTT, PT, fibrinogen, and trough dabigatran levels. Between-subject variance (CVG), within-subject variance (CVI), and analytical variance (CVA) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen participants (median age 65.8 years, 22.2% women) were included, with 130 samples in total. For APTT, the CVG was 11.5%, the CVI 8.8%, and the CVA 1.1%. For PT, these values were 5.2%, 4.0%, and 1.0% and for fibrinogen 13.6%, 11.8%, and 1.6%, respectively. For the dabigatran levels, the percentages were 37.9%, 33.0%, and 3.4%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We assessed the biological variance of APTT, PT, fibrinogen, and dabigatran in a patient population with long-term dabigatran use. The analytical performances of coagulation laboratory tests in patients with AF treated with dabigatran were comparable to those in healthy volunteers.CCMO Registration Number: NL67304.078.18.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Analytical criteria for laboratory analysis based on biological variation are considered state-of-the-art. While biological variance should ideally be measured in patient populations for whom the tests are relevant, data are mostly only available from healthy individuals. We determined the biological variance of activated partial thromboplasmin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), fibrinogen, and trough dabigatran levels in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who were treated with dabigatran.

Methods: Between 2019 and 2022, patients with AF treated >3 months with dabigatran were included. Blood was collected monthly up to 10 times for the measurement of APTT, PT, fibrinogen, and trough dabigatran levels. Between-subject variance (CVG), within-subject variance (CVI), and analytical variance (CVA) were calculated.

Results: Eighteen participants (median age 65.8 years, 22.2% women) were included, with 130 samples in total. For APTT, the CVG was 11.5%, the CVI 8.8%, and the CVA 1.1%. For PT, these values were 5.2%, 4.0%, and 1.0% and for fibrinogen 13.6%, 11.8%, and 1.6%, respectively. For the dabigatran levels, the percentages were 37.9%, 33.0%, and 3.4%, respectively.

Conclusions: We assessed the biological variance of APTT, PT, fibrinogen, and dabigatran in a patient population with long-term dabigatran use. The analytical performances of coagulation laboratory tests in patients with AF treated with dabigatran were comparable to those in healthy volunteers.CCMO Registration Number: NL67304.078.18.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用达比加群的心房颤动患者止血分析指标的生物学变化
背景:基于生物变异的实验室分析标准被认为是最先进的。虽然生物变异最好在与检验相关的患者群体中进行测量,但大多数数据只能从健康人身上获得。我们测定了接受达比加群治疗的心房颤动(房颤)患者的活化部分凝血酶原时间(APTT)、凝血酶原时间(PT)、纤维蛋白原和达比加群谷值的生物变异:方法:纳入2019年至2022年间接受达比加群治疗3个月以上的房颤患者。每月采血10次,测量APTT、PT、纤维蛋白原和达比加群的谷值。计算了受试者间方差(CVG)、受试者内方差(CVI)和分析方差(CVA):共纳入 18 名参与者(中位年龄 65.8 岁,22.2% 为女性),共计 130 份样本。APTT 的 CVG 为 11.5%,CVI 为 8.8%,CVA 为 1.1%。PT 值分别为 5.2%、4.0% 和 1.0%,纤维蛋白原分别为 13.6%、11.8% 和 1.6%。达比加群的百分比分别为 37.9%、33.0% 和 3.4%:我们评估了长期使用达比加群的患者群体中APTT、PT、纤维蛋白原和达比加群的生物学差异。在接受达比加群治疗的房颤患者中,凝血实验室检测的分析性能与健康志愿者相当:NL67304.078.18。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
期刊最新文献
Unraveling Uncertainty: The Impact of Biological and Analytical Variation on the Prediction Uncertainty of Categorical Prediction Models. Fundamental Uncertainty: Interplatform Inconsistency of FDA-Cleared Serological Tests. Commentary on Myocarditis or Myositis? Rising, Declining, and Rising of Critical Cardiac Troponin T Levels in a Patient Post Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy. Myocarditis or Myositis? Rising, Declining, and Rising of Critical Cardiac Troponin T Levels in a Patient Post Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy. Point-of-Care Testing Biosafety Decisions: An Investigation Summary Illustrating Current Decision-Making Process in Ontario, Canada.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1