Bridging the gap: Exploring consumer experiences and motivations for transitioning between illicit and regulated cannabis markets

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE International Journal of Drug Policy Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104644
Jennifer R. Donnan , Rachel Howells , Sylvia Farooq , Myles Maillet , Laura M. Harris-Lane
{"title":"Bridging the gap: Exploring consumer experiences and motivations for transitioning between illicit and regulated cannabis markets","authors":"Jennifer R. Donnan ,&nbsp;Rachel Howells ,&nbsp;Sylvia Farooq ,&nbsp;Myles Maillet ,&nbsp;Laura M. Harris-Lane","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Canada pioneered the non-medical legalization of cannabis production and sales, witnessing substantial growth in the regulated market over the last five years, post-legalization. However, persistent barriers hinder many consumers from transitioning to the legal market, necessitating a nuanced understanding of their behaviors for targeted policy interventions. This study aims to improve understanding of cannabis consumers’ unregulated purchase decisions in British Columbia (B.C.), and to explore motivational factors for transitioning to the legal market.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted semi-structured interviews with cannabis consumers in B.C., who were at least 19 years old and purchased some or all of their cannabis through unregulated sources. Interviews were transcribed and an inductive thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo. Through coding iterations, we moved from descriptive to analytic codes, and finally mapped the codes to themes aligned with the <em>Five Stages of Consumer Decision Making</em> model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants (<em>N</em> = 31) represented a broad range of demographic characteristics (i.e., gender, age, education, income). Four themes were identified: seeking information, evaluation of alternatives, purchase decision, and post purchase evaluation. Despite purchasing all or some of their cannabis from the unregulated market, most participants were supportive of legalization and felt that legal cannabis is safe, accessible, and of reasonable quality. However, several barriers prevent consumers from regularly accessing the regulated market, including: price, lack of sales and promotions, potency, limited product variety, and inadequate product interaction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study delineates barriers that obstruct consumers' transition to the regulated market. These findings, aligned with considerations for public health and safety, offer valuable insights to inform cannabis policy and promote a more effective and consumer-oriented regulatory framework.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 104644"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924003281","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Canada pioneered the non-medical legalization of cannabis production and sales, witnessing substantial growth in the regulated market over the last five years, post-legalization. However, persistent barriers hinder many consumers from transitioning to the legal market, necessitating a nuanced understanding of their behaviors for targeted policy interventions. This study aims to improve understanding of cannabis consumers’ unregulated purchase decisions in British Columbia (B.C.), and to explore motivational factors for transitioning to the legal market.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured interviews with cannabis consumers in B.C., who were at least 19 years old and purchased some or all of their cannabis through unregulated sources. Interviews were transcribed and an inductive thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo. Through coding iterations, we moved from descriptive to analytic codes, and finally mapped the codes to themes aligned with the Five Stages of Consumer Decision Making model.

Results

Participants (N = 31) represented a broad range of demographic characteristics (i.e., gender, age, education, income). Four themes were identified: seeking information, evaluation of alternatives, purchase decision, and post purchase evaluation. Despite purchasing all or some of their cannabis from the unregulated market, most participants were supportive of legalization and felt that legal cannabis is safe, accessible, and of reasonable quality. However, several barriers prevent consumers from regularly accessing the regulated market, including: price, lack of sales and promotions, potency, limited product variety, and inadequate product interaction.

Conclusion

This study delineates barriers that obstruct consumers' transition to the regulated market. These findings, aligned with considerations for public health and safety, offer valuable insights to inform cannabis policy and promote a more effective and consumer-oriented regulatory framework.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缩小差距:探索消费者在非法和受管制大麻市场之间过渡的经历和动机。
背景:加拿大开创了大麻生产和销售非医疗合法化的先河,在合法化后的过去五年里,受监管市场出现了大幅增长。然而,持续存在的障碍阻碍了许多消费者向合法市场过渡,因此有必要深入了解他们的行为,以便采取有针对性的政策干预措施。本研究旨在加深对不列颠哥伦比亚省(B.C.)大麻消费者不受管制的购买决策的了解,并探讨向合法市场过渡的动机因素:我们对不列颠哥伦比亚省的大麻消费者进行了半结构式访谈,这些消费者至少 19 岁,通过非管制渠道购买部分或全部大麻。我们对访谈内容进行了誊写,并使用 NVivo 进行了归纳式主题分析。通过编码迭代,我们从描述性编码转向分析性编码,最后将编码映射到与消费者决策五阶段模型相一致的主题上:参与者(N = 31)代表了广泛的人口特征(即性别、年龄、教育程度、收入)。确定了四个主题:寻求信息、评估替代品、购买决策和购买后评估。尽管大部分或部分大麻是从不受监管的市场上购买的,但大多数参与者都支持大麻合法化,并认为合法大麻安全、易获得且质量合理。然而,一些障碍阻碍了消费者经常进入受管制市场,其中包括:价格、缺乏销售和促销、效力、产品种类有限以及产品互动不足:本研究描述了阻碍消费者过渡到规范市场的障碍。这些研究结果与对公共健康和安全的考虑相一致,为制定大麻政策提供了有价值的见解,并促进了更加有效和以消费者为导向的监管框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
期刊最新文献
National impact of a constraining regulatory framework on pregabalin dispensations in France, 2020–2022 Suboptimal uptake and placement of a mandatory alcohol pregnancy warning label in Australia Increases in employment over six months following Khanya: A secondary analysis of a pilot randomized controlled trial of a peer-delivered behavioral intervention for substance use and HIV medication adherence in Cape Town, South Africa The criminal careers of Australian drug traffickers Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cannabis cultivation and use in 18 countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1