Dissatisfaction with working conditions associated with lower vaccine confidence, commitment and behaviors among nurses: A large scale cross-sectional survey in France

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Studies Pub Date : 2024-10-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104935
{"title":"Dissatisfaction with working conditions associated with lower vaccine confidence, commitment and behaviors among nurses: A large scale cross-sectional survey in France","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic, doctor shortages led many countries to expand nurses' role in their mass vaccination programs. Nonetheless, nurses often express marked vaccine hesitancy. Simultaneously, their working conditions have been deteriorating.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To study 1) the association between nurses' perceptions of their working conditions and their vaccination-related behaviors (vaccination recommendations to their patients), and 2) the mediating role in this associations of their trust in health authorities, vaccine confidence, and vaccine proactive efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A cross-sectional survey.</div></div><div><h3>Settings</h3><div>Salaried, community (self-employed) and mixed nurses in France.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>18,888 nurses registered with the French national order of nurses (ONI, registration is mandatory) (N = 439,323).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In February 2023, this cross-sectional study used an online questionnaire to survey the nurses mandatorily registered with the French national order of nurses. Seven items adapted from models of psychosocial risk factors at work assessed their satisfaction with their working conditions. The international short version of the Pro-VC-Be (health professionals, vaccine confidence and behaviors), a validated instrument measuring psychosocial determinants of health-care professionals' vaccine behaviors) evaluated their vaccine-related attitudes and behaviors. Multiple group mediation analysis with structural equation modeling measured the associations between satisfaction at work, trust in health authorities, vaccine confidence, proactive efficacy (commitment and self-efficacy) in vaccination, and vaccination recommendations (against seasonal influenza for those with a chronic disease and against COVID-19 among adults).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 18,888 participants, satisfaction at work had generally deteriorated, and only 47 % considered vaccines safe. Among salaried nurses (61 %), satisfaction at work was statistically significantly associated (p &lt; 10<sup>−3</sup>) with trust in health authorities (β = 0.26 [0.24; 0.28]), vaccine confidence (total effect: β = 0.35 [0.31; 0.38]), proactive efficacy (total effect: β = 0.18 [0.16; 0.21]), and, to a smaller extent, with seasonal influenza and Covid-19 vaccine recommendations (total effect: β = 0.13 [0.09; 0.16]). Trust in health authorities played a statistically significant role (p &lt; 10<sup>−3</sup>) mediating the associations of satisfaction at work with vaccine confidence and proactive efficacy. These three dimensions in turn mediated the relation between satisfaction at work and frequency of vaccination recommendations. These relations were similar among community nurses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Satisfaction at work appears to enhance nurses' vaccination attitudes and behaviors, which are likely to reinforce their capacity to promote their patients' vaccination. Significant improvement in their working conditions is needed to enable them to accomplish this role serenely.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748924002487","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic, doctor shortages led many countries to expand nurses' role in their mass vaccination programs. Nonetheless, nurses often express marked vaccine hesitancy. Simultaneously, their working conditions have been deteriorating.

Objectives

To study 1) the association between nurses' perceptions of their working conditions and their vaccination-related behaviors (vaccination recommendations to their patients), and 2) the mediating role in this associations of their trust in health authorities, vaccine confidence, and vaccine proactive efficacy.

Design

A cross-sectional survey.

Settings

Salaried, community (self-employed) and mixed nurses in France.

Participants

18,888 nurses registered with the French national order of nurses (ONI, registration is mandatory) (N = 439,323).

Methods

In February 2023, this cross-sectional study used an online questionnaire to survey the nurses mandatorily registered with the French national order of nurses. Seven items adapted from models of psychosocial risk factors at work assessed their satisfaction with their working conditions. The international short version of the Pro-VC-Be (health professionals, vaccine confidence and behaviors), a validated instrument measuring psychosocial determinants of health-care professionals' vaccine behaviors) evaluated their vaccine-related attitudes and behaviors. Multiple group mediation analysis with structural equation modeling measured the associations between satisfaction at work, trust in health authorities, vaccine confidence, proactive efficacy (commitment and self-efficacy) in vaccination, and vaccination recommendations (against seasonal influenza for those with a chronic disease and against COVID-19 among adults).

Results

Among the 18,888 participants, satisfaction at work had generally deteriorated, and only 47 % considered vaccines safe. Among salaried nurses (61 %), satisfaction at work was statistically significantly associated (p < 10−3) with trust in health authorities (β = 0.26 [0.24; 0.28]), vaccine confidence (total effect: β = 0.35 [0.31; 0.38]), proactive efficacy (total effect: β = 0.18 [0.16; 0.21]), and, to a smaller extent, with seasonal influenza and Covid-19 vaccine recommendations (total effect: β = 0.13 [0.09; 0.16]). Trust in health authorities played a statistically significant role (p < 10−3) mediating the associations of satisfaction at work with vaccine confidence and proactive efficacy. These three dimensions in turn mediated the relation between satisfaction at work and frequency of vaccination recommendations. These relations were similar among community nurses.

Conclusions

Satisfaction at work appears to enhance nurses' vaccination attitudes and behaviors, which are likely to reinforce their capacity to promote their patients' vaccination. Significant improvement in their working conditions is needed to enable them to accomplish this role serenely.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对工作条件的不满与护士对疫苗的信心、承诺和行为的降低有关:法国大规模横断面调查。
背景:在 COVID-19 大流行之前、期间和之后,由于医生短缺,许多国家扩大了护士在大规模疫苗接种计划中的作用。然而,护士们经常对疫苗表示明显的犹豫。同时,他们的工作条件也在不断恶化:研究 1)护士对其工作条件的看法与他们的疫苗接种相关行为(向病人推荐疫苗接种)之间的关联;2)他们对卫生当局的信任、疫苗信心和疫苗主动效力在这种关联中的中介作用:设计:横断面调查:参与者:18888 名在法国注册的护士:18,888 名在法国国家护士协会(ONI,强制注册)注册的护士(N=439,323):这项横断面研究于 2023 年 2 月对在法国国家护士协会强制注册的护士进行了在线问卷调查。根据工作中的社会心理风险因素模型改编的七个项目评估了她们对工作条件的满意度。Pro-VC-Be(医护人员、疫苗信心和行为)的国际简版(这是一个测量医护人员疫苗行为的社会心理决定因素的有效工具)评估了他们与疫苗相关的态度和行为。利用结构方程模型进行的多组中介分析测量了工作满意度、对卫生机构的信任、疫苗信心、主动接种疫苗的效率(承诺和自我效能)和疫苗接种建议(慢性病患者接种季节性流感疫苗和成人接种 COVID-19)之间的关联:在 18888 名参与者中,工作满意度普遍下降,只有 47% 的人认为疫苗是安全的。在受薪护士(61%)中,工作满意度与对卫生机构的信任度(β = 0.26 [0.24; 0.28])、对疫苗的信心(总效应:β = 0.35 [0.31; 0.38])、主动效力(总效应:β = 0.18 [0.16; 0.21]),以及在较小程度上与季节性流感和 Covid-19 疫苗推荐相关(总效应:β = 0.13 [0.09; 0.16])。对卫生机构的信任在统计学上对工作满意度与疫苗信心和主动效力之间的关联起着显著的中介作用(p -3)。这三个方面又反过来调节了工作满意度与疫苗接种建议频率之间的关系。这些关系在社区护士中类似:结论:工作满意度似乎会提高护士的疫苗接种态度和行为,这很可能会加强她们向患者宣传疫苗接种的能力。要使她们能够安心地履行这一职责,就必须大力改善她们的工作条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
181
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Studies (IJNS) is a highly respected journal that has been publishing original peer-reviewed articles since 1963. It provides a forum for original research and scholarship about health care delivery, organisation, management, workforce, policy, and research methods relevant to nursing, midwifery, and other health related professions. The journal aims to support evidence informed policy and practice by publishing research, systematic and other scholarly reviews, critical discussion, and commentary of the highest standard. The IJNS is indexed in major databases including PubMed, Medline, Thomson Reuters - Science Citation Index, Scopus, Thomson Reuters - Social Science Citation Index, CINAHL, and the BNI (British Nursing Index).
期刊最新文献
Using nudges to promote health among older adults: A scoping review Family involvement in preventing delirium in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Job characteristics, personal characteristics and well-being of nursing assistants in long-term care facilities: A mixed methods systematic review and narrative synthesis Dissatisfaction with working conditions associated with lower vaccine confidence, commitment and behaviors among nurses: A large scale cross-sectional survey in France Corrigendum to “The prevalence and risk factors of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among nurses in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis” [Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 157 (2024) 104826]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1