The effects of professional expertise on perceptions of treatment need in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a comparison between orthodontists, general dentists, and lay people in Germany.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1007/s00056-024-00551-0
Sarah Bühling, Stefanie Neidhardt, Babak Sayahpour, Sara Eslami, Nicolas Plein, Stefan Kopp
{"title":"The effects of professional expertise on perceptions of treatment need in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a comparison between orthodontists, general dentists, and lay people in Germany.","authors":"Sarah Bühling, Stefanie Neidhardt, Babak Sayahpour, Sara Eslami, Nicolas Plein, Stefan Kopp","doi":"10.1007/s00056-024-00551-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare the perception of practitioners with varying levels of expertise and laypeople regarding the orthodontic treatment need and facial harmony in patients with increased anterior overjet.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three groups of observers (orthodontists, general dentists, and laypeople, in total n = 48) were asked to rate on images-using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS)-the facial harmony and treatment need of a sample of 8 patients with class II division 1 malocclusion and overjets of 2, 4, 6, and 8 mm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant differences were observed between the three groups of observers regarding patients with an overjet of 4 mm and above (p < 0.001). Treatment need was perceived at an overjet of 4 mm by orthodontists and 6 mm by general dentists, whereas laypeople did not perceive a need for treatment in any of the groups (p < 0.001). Regarding perception of facial harmony, orthodontists had the lowest threshold (4 mm overjet), while dentists followed at a greater overjet of 6 mm or more (p < 0.001). A statistically significant correlation between the noticed facial harmony and the perceived orthodontic treatment need was found in all observers (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The perceived orthodontic treatment need for class II division 1 malocclusion increased with increasing professional expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":54776,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-024-00551-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the perception of practitioners with varying levels of expertise and laypeople regarding the orthodontic treatment need and facial harmony in patients with increased anterior overjet.

Methods: Three groups of observers (orthodontists, general dentists, and laypeople, in total n = 48) were asked to rate on images-using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS)-the facial harmony and treatment need of a sample of 8 patients with class II division 1 malocclusion and overjets of 2, 4, 6, and 8 mm.

Results: Statistically significant differences were observed between the three groups of observers regarding patients with an overjet of 4 mm and above (p < 0.001). Treatment need was perceived at an overjet of 4 mm by orthodontists and 6 mm by general dentists, whereas laypeople did not perceive a need for treatment in any of the groups (p < 0.001). Regarding perception of facial harmony, orthodontists had the lowest threshold (4 mm overjet), while dentists followed at a greater overjet of 6 mm or more (p < 0.001). A statistically significant correlation between the noticed facial harmony and the perceived orthodontic treatment need was found in all observers (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The perceived orthodontic treatment need for class II division 1 malocclusion increased with increasing professional expertise.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专业知识对 II 类 1 分区错牙合畸形患者治疗需求认知的影响:德国正畸医师、普通牙医和非专业人士之间的比较。
目的:本研究旨在比较具有不同专业水平的医生和非专业人士对前牙槽骨过高患者的正畸治疗需求和面部和谐的看法:要求三组观察者(正畸医师、普通牙医和非专业人士,共48人)使用10分视觉模拟量表(VAS)对8名Ⅱ类Ⅰ型错颌畸形和2、4、6和8毫米过咬合患者的面部和谐度和治疗需求进行评分:结果:三组观察者对咬合过高 4 毫米及以上患者的评价差异有统计学意义(P<0.05):随着专业技能的提高,对二类一区错颌畸形的正畸治疗需求感知会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics provides orthodontists and dentists who are also actively interested in orthodontics, whether in university clinics or private practice, with highly authoritative and up-to-date information based on experimental and clinical research. The journal is one of the leading publications for the promulgation of the results of original work both in the areas of scientific and clinical orthodontics and related areas. All articles undergo peer review before publication. The German Society of Orthodontics (DGKFO) also publishes in the journal important communications, statements and announcements.
期刊最新文献
The effects of professional expertise on perceptions of treatment need in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a comparison between orthodontists, general dentists, and lay people in Germany. Mitteilungen der DGKFO. Effect of orthodontic extraction of mandibular premolars on third molar angulation after treatment with fixed appliances : A cross-sectional study. Long-term effects of orthodontic interceptive expansion treatment : A retrospective study. Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of enamel surfaces using different air-polishing powders in the orthodontic setting: an in vitro study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1