ACVECC-Veterinary Committee on Trauma registry report 2020-2021.

Charles T Talbot, Marc R Raffe, Manuel Boller, Melissa L Edwards, Kelly E Hall
{"title":"ACVECC-Veterinary Committee on Trauma registry report 2020-2021.","authors":"Charles T Talbot, Marc R Raffe, Manuel Boller, Melissa L Edwards, Kelly E Hall","doi":"10.1111/vec.13436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report summative data from the American College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care (ACVECC)-Veterinary Committee on Trauma (VetCOT) registry, with further individual evaluation of university and private practices and level I and II Veterinary Trauma Centers (VTCs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multi-institutional registry data report, January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>VTCs identified and verified by ACVECC-VetCOT.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Dogs and cats with evidence of trauma.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Data were input to a web-based data capture system (REDCap) by data entry personnel trained in registry software use and operational definitions of data variables. Patient data on demographics, trauma type, preadmission care, trauma severity assessment at presentation (modified Glasgow Coma Score and Animal Trauma Triage score), key laboratory parameters, interventions, and outcome were collected. Summary descriptive data for each species are reported.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Twenty-two VTCs contributed data to the VetCOT registry during a 24-month period, culminating in a total of 9758 complete trauma case records for dogs and 11734 for cats. Head trauma in dogs and cats was seen at a higher percentage in both university-only VTCs (encompassing both level I and II) (20.1% and 24.1%, respectively) and level I-only VTCs (24.3% and 24.1%, respectively), in comparison to private-only VTCs (encompassing both level I and II) (13.5% and 16.2%, respectively) and individual level II VTCs (14.1% and 18.9%, respectively). Canine and feline surgical procedures were performed at a higher percentage at university VTCs (50% and 40.5%, respectively) compared to private VTCs (39.2% and 28.6%, respectively). Overall survival to discharge for dogs and cats remains high at 93.1% and 83.6%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The VetCOT registry has continued to show powerful potential in collating a large, multifaceted, international dataset in trauma for both dogs and cats. As published in previous VetCOT registry reports, survival to discharge has remained static across both university and private practice veterinary hospitals; however, further breakdown has identified university and level I VTCs admitting and managing a higher number of head traumas, as well as university VTCs performing a higher proportion of surgical procedures. Data from this registry will continue to aid in the design of clinical trials, prospective observational studies, and translational research, which will improve the understanding and outcome of trauma patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":74015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.13436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To report summative data from the American College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care (ACVECC)-Veterinary Committee on Trauma (VetCOT) registry, with further individual evaluation of university and private practices and level I and II Veterinary Trauma Centers (VTCs).

Design: Multi-institutional registry data report, January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021.

Setting: VTCs identified and verified by ACVECC-VetCOT.

Animals: Dogs and cats with evidence of trauma.

Interventions: Data were input to a web-based data capture system (REDCap) by data entry personnel trained in registry software use and operational definitions of data variables. Patient data on demographics, trauma type, preadmission care, trauma severity assessment at presentation (modified Glasgow Coma Score and Animal Trauma Triage score), key laboratory parameters, interventions, and outcome were collected. Summary descriptive data for each species are reported.

Measurements and main results: Twenty-two VTCs contributed data to the VetCOT registry during a 24-month period, culminating in a total of 9758 complete trauma case records for dogs and 11734 for cats. Head trauma in dogs and cats was seen at a higher percentage in both university-only VTCs (encompassing both level I and II) (20.1% and 24.1%, respectively) and level I-only VTCs (24.3% and 24.1%, respectively), in comparison to private-only VTCs (encompassing both level I and II) (13.5% and 16.2%, respectively) and individual level II VTCs (14.1% and 18.9%, respectively). Canine and feline surgical procedures were performed at a higher percentage at university VTCs (50% and 40.5%, respectively) compared to private VTCs (39.2% and 28.6%, respectively). Overall survival to discharge for dogs and cats remains high at 93.1% and 83.6%, respectively.

Conclusions: The VetCOT registry has continued to show powerful potential in collating a large, multifaceted, international dataset in trauma for both dogs and cats. As published in previous VetCOT registry reports, survival to discharge has remained static across both university and private practice veterinary hospitals; however, further breakdown has identified university and level I VTCs admitting and managing a higher number of head traumas, as well as university VTCs performing a higher proportion of surgical procedures. Data from this registry will continue to aid in the design of clinical trials, prospective observational studies, and translational research, which will improve the understanding and outcome of trauma patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ACVECC - 兽医创伤委员会 2020-2021 年登记报告。
目标:报告来自美国兽医急诊和重症监护学院(ACVECC)-兽医创伤委员会(VetCOT)登记处的总结性数据,并进一步对大学和私人诊所以及一级和二级兽医创伤中心(VTC)进行单独评估:设计:2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日的多机构登记数据报告:由 ACVECC-VetCOT 确定和验证的 VTC:动物:有外伤证据的猫狗:由接受过登记软件使用和数据变量操作定义培训的数据录入人员将数据输入基于网络的数据采集系统 (REDCap)。收集的患者数据包括人口统计学特征、创伤类型、入院前护理、发病时的创伤严重程度评估(改良格拉斯哥昏迷评分和动物创伤分诊评分)、关键实验室参数、干预措施和治疗结果。报告了每个物种的描述性数据摘要:在 24 个月的时间里,22 家 VTC 向 VetCOT 登记处提供了数据,最终共收集到 9758 份完整的狗创伤病例记录和 11734 份完整的猫创伤病例记录。狗和猫的头部外伤在纯大学职教中心(包括一级和二级)(分别为20.1%和24.1%)和纯一级职教中心(分别为24.3%和24.1%)中的比例均高于纯私人职教中心(包括一级和二级)(分别为13.5%和16.2%)和纯二级职教中心(分别为14.1%和18.9%)。与私立职业医疗中心(分别为 39.2% 和 28.6%)相比,大学职业医疗中心进行犬科和猫科手术的比例更高(分别为 50% 和 40.5%)。狗和猫出院后的总体存活率仍然很高,分别为93.1%和83.6%:VetCOT登记中心在整理大型、多方面、国际性的猫狗创伤数据集方面继续显示出强大的潜力。正如之前的VetCOT登记报告所公布的那样,大学和私人执业兽医院的出院存活率保持稳定;但是,进一步细分后发现,大学和一级职业治疗中心收治和管理的头部创伤数量较多,大学职业治疗中心实施外科手术的比例也较高。该登记处的数据将继续有助于临床试验、前瞻性观察研究和转化研究的设计,从而提高对创伤患者的了解并改善其治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design of a nasopharyngeal tamponade device in canine cadavers. Evaluation of the Trauma-Associated Severe Hemorrhage score as a predictor of transfusion in traumatized dogs. Analysis of cannabinoids in plasma from 38 cases of suspected cannabinoid intoxication in dogs. Bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis in a weanling donkey jack. The establishment of reference intervals for the ClotPro thromboelastometry device in healthy dogs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1