Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Ranibizumab (OPTIMAB®) versus Innovator Ranibizumab in Patients with Neovascular (Wet) Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Study.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2024-10-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S488866
Parth J Rana, Himanshu Deshmukh, Urmil Shah, Vinod Kumar, Sanghamitra Kanungo, Deepika Singhal, Santosh Kumar Mahapatra, Ira Vakharia, Mukesh Jaiswal, Ajitkumar Gondane, Pooja Vaidya, Vinayaka Shahavi, Harish Shandilya, Dattatray Pawar, Akhilesh Sharma
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Ranibizumab (OPTIMAB<sup>®</sup>) <i>versus</i> Innovator Ranibizumab in Patients with Neovascular (Wet) Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Study.","authors":"Parth J Rana, Himanshu Deshmukh, Urmil Shah, Vinod Kumar, Sanghamitra Kanungo, Deepika Singhal, Santosh Kumar Mahapatra, Ira Vakharia, Mukesh Jaiswal, Ajitkumar Gondane, Pooja Vaidya, Vinayaka Shahavi, Harish Shandilya, Dattatray Pawar, Akhilesh Sharma","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S488866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the biosimilar ranibizumab in comparison with the Innovator Ranibizumab in treatment-naive patients with neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (nAMD or wAMD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This comparative, double blind, multicentre, Phase III clinical study randomized eligible patients in a 3:1 ratio to receive either OPTIMAB<sup>®</sup> (Alkem Laboratories Ltd./ Enzene Biosciences Ltd.) or Innovator Ranibizumab. Intravitreal injections of Innovator Ranibizumab (0.5 mg in 0.05 mL) and OPTIMAB<sup>®</sup> (0.5 mg in 0.05 mL) were administered every four weeks for 12 weeks (three doses). Primary efficacy endpoints included loss of <15 letters from baseline, gain of ≥15 letters from baseline in visual acuity, mean change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline, and change in central subfoveal thickness (CSFT) from baseline at week 12. Safety was assessed through monitoring of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) throughout the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, of the 152 patients randomized, 141 (92.8%) patients (mean age, 66.6 ± 9.37 years) completed the study. Percentage of patients who lost < 15 letters in BCVA at week 12 from baseline was comparable in both the groups (100.0%, each). On secondary end point analysis, the two groups had comparable mean changes in BCVA (OPTIMAB<sup>®</sup>, 11.8 ± 9.18; innovator ranibizumab, 12.9 ± 10.29; P = 0.5509); proportion of patients who gained ≥ 15 letters in visual acuity (OPTIMAB<sup>®</sup>, 32.18%; innovator ranibizumab, 25.74%; P = 0.4785) and mean change in CSFT (OPTIMAB<sup>®</sup>, -76.6 ± 89.03; Innovator ranibizumab, -73.1 ± 92.23 μm; P = 0.8422) at week 12 as compared to baseline. OPTIMAB<sup>®</sup> and innovator ranibizumab demonstrated comparable safety over the 12-week treatment period and no patient expressed anti-ranibizumab antibody in either group patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Biosimilar ranibizumab (OPTIMAB<sup>®</sup>) was non-inferior to innovator ranibizumab in terms of efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity in the patients of nAMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S488866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the biosimilar ranibizumab in comparison with the Innovator Ranibizumab in treatment-naive patients with neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (nAMD or wAMD).

Materials and methods: This comparative, double blind, multicentre, Phase III clinical study randomized eligible patients in a 3:1 ratio to receive either OPTIMAB® (Alkem Laboratories Ltd./ Enzene Biosciences Ltd.) or Innovator Ranibizumab. Intravitreal injections of Innovator Ranibizumab (0.5 mg in 0.05 mL) and OPTIMAB® (0.5 mg in 0.05 mL) were administered every four weeks for 12 weeks (three doses). Primary efficacy endpoints included loss of <15 letters from baseline, gain of ≥15 letters from baseline in visual acuity, mean change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline, and change in central subfoveal thickness (CSFT) from baseline at week 12. Safety was assessed through monitoring of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) throughout the study.

Results: Overall, of the 152 patients randomized, 141 (92.8%) patients (mean age, 66.6 ± 9.37 years) completed the study. Percentage of patients who lost < 15 letters in BCVA at week 12 from baseline was comparable in both the groups (100.0%, each). On secondary end point analysis, the two groups had comparable mean changes in BCVA (OPTIMAB®, 11.8 ± 9.18; innovator ranibizumab, 12.9 ± 10.29; P = 0.5509); proportion of patients who gained ≥ 15 letters in visual acuity (OPTIMAB®, 32.18%; innovator ranibizumab, 25.74%; P = 0.4785) and mean change in CSFT (OPTIMAB®, -76.6 ± 89.03; Innovator ranibizumab, -73.1 ± 92.23 μm; P = 0.8422) at week 12 as compared to baseline. OPTIMAB® and innovator ranibizumab demonstrated comparable safety over the 12-week treatment period and no patient expressed anti-ranibizumab antibody in either group patient.

Conclusion: Biosimilar ranibizumab (OPTIMAB®) was non-inferior to innovator ranibizumab in terms of efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity in the patients of nAMD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物仿制药 Ranibizumab (OPTIMAB®) 与创新药 Ranibizumab 对新生血管性(湿性)年龄相关性黄斑变性患者的疗效和安全性对比:一项双盲、随机、多中心 III 期研究。
研究目的本研究旨在比较生物仿制药雷尼珠单抗与创新药雷尼珠单抗对新生血管性(湿性)年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD 或 wAMD)治疗无效患者的疗效、安全性和免疫原性:这项比较性、双盲、多中心、III期临床研究以3:1的比例随机分配符合条件的患者接受OPTIMAB®(Alkem Laboratories Ltd. / Enzene Biosciences Ltd.)或Innovator Ranibizumab治疗。创新者雷珠单抗(0.5毫克,0.05毫升)和OPTIMAB®(0.5毫克,0.05毫升)每四周进行一次玻璃体内注射,共注射12周(3次)。主要疗效终点包括结果丧失:总体而言,在 152 名随机患者中,141 名(92.8%)患者(平均年龄为 66.6 ± 9.37 岁)完成了研究。两组患者在第 12 周 BCVA 从基线下降 < 15 个字母的百分比相当(均为 100.0%)。在次要终点分析中,两组患者的 BCVA 平均变化相当(OPTIMAB®,11.8 ± 9.18;创新药 ranibizumab,12.9 ± 10.29;P = 0.5509);视力增加≥15 个字母的患者比例相当(OPTIMAB®,32.18%;创新药 ranibizumab,25.74%;P = 0.4785);第 12 周与基线相比 CSFT 的平均变化(OPTIMAB®,-76.6 ± 89.03;创新药 ranibizumab,-73.1 ± 92.23 μm;P = 0.8422)。在为期12周的治疗期间,OPTIMAB®和创新药雷尼珠单抗的安全性相当,两组患者均未出现抗雷尼珠单抗抗体:结论:在nAMD患者中,生物仿制药ranibizumab (OPTIMAB®)在疗效、安全性和免疫原性方面均不劣于创新药ranibizumab。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association Between Particulate Matter Pollutants and Ophthalmology Visits for Ocular Surface Irritation and Allergy. The Cutting Efficiency of a Hybrid Phacoemulsification Tip Using High and Low Intraocular Pressure Settings in Different Grades of Cataract. Comparison of Large Language Models in Diagnosis and Management of Challenging Clinical Cases. Enhancing OCT Reliability: The Role of Eye-Tracking in Achieving Consistent Retinal Measurements [Letter]. Baseline Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Seen Through the Free Diabetes Screening (FDS) Program.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1