Dynamic conservation strategies for protected areas of Fujian Province: From integrated perspective of the adaptability of habitat and carbon storage to climate
Aifang Weng , Qunyue Liu , Yuying Lin , Mir Muhammad Nizamani , Linsheng Wen , Yunrui Zhou , Hongxin Wang , Baoyin Li
{"title":"Dynamic conservation strategies for protected areas of Fujian Province: From integrated perspective of the adaptability of habitat and carbon storage to climate","authors":"Aifang Weng , Qunyue Liu , Yuying Lin , Mir Muhammad Nizamani , Linsheng Wen , Yunrui Zhou , Hongxin Wang , Baoyin Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traditional protected areas (PAs) with fixed boundaries are insufficient in the face of global climate change, undermining biodiversity conservation and climate impact mitigation. Fujian Province, a biodiversity hotspot in China, requires dynamic conservation strategies to maintain habitat quality (HQ) and carbon storage (CS). This research introduces a novel framework that integrates land-use simulation and ecosystem service valuation models to address conservation challenges under varying climate scenarios. We employ the System Dynamics (SD), the Patch-generating Land Use Simulation (PLUS) model, and the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) model to explore how future climate scenarios might alter land use, HQ, and CS, and determines the conservation priorities for Fujian Province by 2050 based on HQ, CS capacity, and a future vision for protection. Findings indicate: (1) Under SSP1-2.6, Fujian Province exhibits an increased demand for forests, grasslands, and water resources, while SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 predict an elevated demand for urban land, extending into inland areas. (2) In SSP1-2.6, HQ and CS are expected to improve, with average HQ projected to rise to 0.71 and CS to 15.63 Mg/ha by 2050. Conversely, under SSP5-8.5, HQ is anticipated to decline to 0.66, and CS to 15.14 Mg/ha. SSP2-4.5 shows moderate levels, with slight decreases in HQ to 0.69 and CS to 15.34 Mg/ha due to moderate urban expansion. Nature reserves demonstrate the highest potential, while national parks remain stable and ocean parks perform poorly. (3) Hotspots are primarily located in the western Wuyishan and central Daiyun mountain ranges. Conservation targets are recommended at 15 %, 30 %, and 43 % of Fujian Province’s area for 2030, 2040, and 2050, respectively. This research provides a framework for enhancing protected areas, empowering governments to advance biodiversity conservation and achieve carbon neutrality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 112773"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24012305","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Traditional protected areas (PAs) with fixed boundaries are insufficient in the face of global climate change, undermining biodiversity conservation and climate impact mitigation. Fujian Province, a biodiversity hotspot in China, requires dynamic conservation strategies to maintain habitat quality (HQ) and carbon storage (CS). This research introduces a novel framework that integrates land-use simulation and ecosystem service valuation models to address conservation challenges under varying climate scenarios. We employ the System Dynamics (SD), the Patch-generating Land Use Simulation (PLUS) model, and the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) model to explore how future climate scenarios might alter land use, HQ, and CS, and determines the conservation priorities for Fujian Province by 2050 based on HQ, CS capacity, and a future vision for protection. Findings indicate: (1) Under SSP1-2.6, Fujian Province exhibits an increased demand for forests, grasslands, and water resources, while SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 predict an elevated demand for urban land, extending into inland areas. (2) In SSP1-2.6, HQ and CS are expected to improve, with average HQ projected to rise to 0.71 and CS to 15.63 Mg/ha by 2050. Conversely, under SSP5-8.5, HQ is anticipated to decline to 0.66, and CS to 15.14 Mg/ha. SSP2-4.5 shows moderate levels, with slight decreases in HQ to 0.69 and CS to 15.34 Mg/ha due to moderate urban expansion. Nature reserves demonstrate the highest potential, while national parks remain stable and ocean parks perform poorly. (3) Hotspots are primarily located in the western Wuyishan and central Daiyun mountain ranges. Conservation targets are recommended at 15 %, 30 %, and 43 % of Fujian Province’s area for 2030, 2040, and 2050, respectively. This research provides a framework for enhancing protected areas, empowering governments to advance biodiversity conservation and achieve carbon neutrality.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.