Multi-scale analysis of the susceptibility of different landslide types and identification of the main controlling factors

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ecological Indicators Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112797
Yuqian Yang , Shuangyun Peng , Bangmei Huang , Dequan Xu , Yuanyuan Yin , Ting Li , Rui Zhang
{"title":"Multi-scale analysis of the susceptibility of different landslide types and identification of the main controlling factors","authors":"Yuqian Yang ,&nbsp;Shuangyun Peng ,&nbsp;Bangmei Huang ,&nbsp;Dequan Xu ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Yin ,&nbsp;Ting Li ,&nbsp;Rui Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Landslides are common and extremely destructive geological hazards in mountainous areas, posing a serious threat to life, property, and socioeconomic development. Landslide susceptibility mapping is a key link in landslide risk management, but existing studies are mostly limited to single landslide types and single scale analysis, which makes it difficult to fully reflect the complexity and diversity of landslide occurrence. This paper takes Zhenxiong County, Yunnan Province as the study area, and constructs a multi-type and multi-scale landslide susceptibility mapping method by integrating information value (IV) model and principal component analysis (PCA) model. It reveals the scale effect of landslide driving force and the impact of this scale effect on the accuracy of susceptibility mapping, and identifies the main controlling factors of landslides at different scales. The results of the study showed that: (1) The influencing factors of the three landslide types have significant scale effects. Natural factors such as topography and geology play a controlling role at the buffer zone scale of 800–1000 m, while inducing factors such as human activities and rainfall mainly play a role at the buffer zone scale of 100–600 m. (2) The scale effect of influencing factors significantly affects the accuracy of landslide susceptibility mapping. The AUC value of soil landslide shows a trend of first increasing and then decreasing with the increase of scale, and the optimal AUC value is 0.815 at the 600-meter scale; the AUC value of rock landslide shows a trend of fluctuating and then increasing with the increase of scale, and the AUC value at the 1000-meter scale reaches the highest value of 0.877; the AUC value of ground collapse fluctuates with the expansion of scale, and the AUC value at the 800-meter scale is 0.883, which is the highest value among all scales. (3) Different types of landslides are controlled by different dominant factors. Slope height, rainfall and engineering geological rock formations are the main controlling factors for soil landslides; topographic factors such as slope height and DEM are the main controlling factors for rock landslides; DEM and engineering geological rock formations are the main controlling factors for ground collapse. The multi-type and multi-scale landslide susceptibility mapping method proposed in this paper can effectively identify the main controlling factors and scale effects of different types of landslides, improve the accuracy and reliability of landslide susceptibility mapping, and provide a scientific basis and decision-making support for landslide disaster prevention and control in Zhenxiong County.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 112797"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24012548","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Landslides are common and extremely destructive geological hazards in mountainous areas, posing a serious threat to life, property, and socioeconomic development. Landslide susceptibility mapping is a key link in landslide risk management, but existing studies are mostly limited to single landslide types and single scale analysis, which makes it difficult to fully reflect the complexity and diversity of landslide occurrence. This paper takes Zhenxiong County, Yunnan Province as the study area, and constructs a multi-type and multi-scale landslide susceptibility mapping method by integrating information value (IV) model and principal component analysis (PCA) model. It reveals the scale effect of landslide driving force and the impact of this scale effect on the accuracy of susceptibility mapping, and identifies the main controlling factors of landslides at different scales. The results of the study showed that: (1) The influencing factors of the three landslide types have significant scale effects. Natural factors such as topography and geology play a controlling role at the buffer zone scale of 800–1000 m, while inducing factors such as human activities and rainfall mainly play a role at the buffer zone scale of 100–600 m. (2) The scale effect of influencing factors significantly affects the accuracy of landslide susceptibility mapping. The AUC value of soil landslide shows a trend of first increasing and then decreasing with the increase of scale, and the optimal AUC value is 0.815 at the 600-meter scale; the AUC value of rock landslide shows a trend of fluctuating and then increasing with the increase of scale, and the AUC value at the 1000-meter scale reaches the highest value of 0.877; the AUC value of ground collapse fluctuates with the expansion of scale, and the AUC value at the 800-meter scale is 0.883, which is the highest value among all scales. (3) Different types of landslides are controlled by different dominant factors. Slope height, rainfall and engineering geological rock formations are the main controlling factors for soil landslides; topographic factors such as slope height and DEM are the main controlling factors for rock landslides; DEM and engineering geological rock formations are the main controlling factors for ground collapse. The multi-type and multi-scale landslide susceptibility mapping method proposed in this paper can effectively identify the main controlling factors and scale effects of different types of landslides, improve the accuracy and reliability of landslide susceptibility mapping, and provide a scientific basis and decision-making support for landslide disaster prevention and control in Zhenxiong County.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对不同滑坡类型的易发性进行多尺度分析并确定主要控制因素
滑坡是山区常见的破坏性极大的地质灾害,对生命、财产和社会经济发展构成严重威胁。滑坡易发性测绘是滑坡风险管理的关键环节,但现有研究多局限于单一滑坡类型和单一尺度分析,难以全面反映滑坡发生的复杂性和多样性。本文以云南省镇雄县为研究区域,结合信息值(IV)模型和主成分分析(PCA)模型,构建了多类型、多尺度滑坡易损性绘图方法。该方法揭示了滑坡驱动力的尺度效应及其对滑坡易损性成图精度的影响,明确了不同尺度滑坡的主要控制因子。研究结果表明(1)三种滑坡类型的影响因素具有显著的尺度效应。地形和地质等自然因素在 800-1000 m 缓冲区尺度上起控制作用,而人类活动和降雨等诱发因素主要在 100-600 m 缓冲区尺度上起作用。土壤滑坡的 AUC 值随着尺度的增大呈先增大后减小的趋势,600 米尺度的最佳 AUC 值为 0.815;岩石滑坡的 AUC 值随着尺度的增大呈先波动后增大的趋势,1000 米尺度的 AUC 值达到最高,为 0.877;地面塌陷的 AUC 值随着尺度的扩大呈波动趋势,800 米尺度的 AUC 值为 0.883,是所有尺度中的最高值。(3) 不同类型的滑坡受不同主导因素的控制。坡高、降雨和工程地质岩层是土壤滑坡的主要控制因素;坡高和 DEM 等地形因素是岩石滑坡的主要控制因素;DEM 和工程地质岩层是地面塌陷的主要控制因素。本文提出的多类型、多尺度滑坡易损性成图方法,可有效识别不同类型滑坡的主要控制因素和尺度效应,提高滑坡易损性成图的准确性和可靠性,为镇雄县滑坡灾害防治提供科学依据和决策支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
期刊最新文献
Urban forest indicator assessment for nature-based solutions to connect biodiversity and people Drivers of prehistoric cultural evolution in the Chengdu Plain: Fire events and environmental changes during the middle and late Holocene A novel integrated socio-ecological-economic index for assessing heat health risk Long-term water quality dynamics and trend assessment reveal the effectiveness of ecological compensation: Insights from China’s first cross-provincial compensation watershed Tracking ecosystem stability across boreal Siberia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1