Thread-sensitive fuzzing for concurrency bug detection

IF 4.8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Computers & Security Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.cose.2024.104171
Jingwen Zhao, Yan Fu, Yanxia Wu, Jibin Dong, Ruize Hong
{"title":"Thread-sensitive fuzzing for concurrency bug detection","authors":"Jingwen Zhao,&nbsp;Yan Fu,&nbsp;Yanxia Wu,&nbsp;Jibin Dong,&nbsp;Ruize Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.cose.2024.104171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fuzzing is a commonly used method for identifying bugs and vulnerabilities in software. However, current methods for improving fuzzing in concurrency environments often lack a detailed analysis of the program’s concurrent state space. This leads to inefficient execution of previously verified concurrent states and missed information. We have developed TSAFL, a novel concurrency fuzzing framework that aims to detect the running state of concurrency programs and uncover hard-to-find vulnerabilities. TSAFL builds upon AFL’s concurrency vulnerability detection capabilities by incorporating three new techniques. Firstly, we introduce two new coverage metrics to measure concurrency: concurrent behavior window and CFG prediction. These metrics enhance the TSAFL’s capabilities to explore more thread interleavings. The second technique adds efficient thread-interleaved scheduling to fuzzing combined with period scheduling. Several methods are proposed to avoid problems caused by simply using period scheduling to accurately detect and verify all concurrent state spaces. Thirdly, we propose a multi-objective optimization mechanism based on the characteristics of concurrent fuzz testing to fully utilize the information in the seed files. Using these three techniques, our concurrency fuzzing approach effectively covers infrequent thread interleavings with concrete context information. We evaluated TSAFL on user-level applications, and experiments show that TSAFL outperforms AFL++ and MOPT in multithreading-related seed generation and concurrent vulnerability detection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51004,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Security","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167404824004760","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fuzzing is a commonly used method for identifying bugs and vulnerabilities in software. However, current methods for improving fuzzing in concurrency environments often lack a detailed analysis of the program’s concurrent state space. This leads to inefficient execution of previously verified concurrent states and missed information. We have developed TSAFL, a novel concurrency fuzzing framework that aims to detect the running state of concurrency programs and uncover hard-to-find vulnerabilities. TSAFL builds upon AFL’s concurrency vulnerability detection capabilities by incorporating three new techniques. Firstly, we introduce two new coverage metrics to measure concurrency: concurrent behavior window and CFG prediction. These metrics enhance the TSAFL’s capabilities to explore more thread interleavings. The second technique adds efficient thread-interleaved scheduling to fuzzing combined with period scheduling. Several methods are proposed to avoid problems caused by simply using period scheduling to accurately detect and verify all concurrent state spaces. Thirdly, we propose a multi-objective optimization mechanism based on the characteristics of concurrent fuzz testing to fully utilize the information in the seed files. Using these three techniques, our concurrency fuzzing approach effectively covers infrequent thread interleavings with concrete context information. We evaluated TSAFL on user-level applications, and experiments show that TSAFL outperforms AFL++ and MOPT in multithreading-related seed generation and concurrent vulnerability detection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对并发错误检测的线程敏感模糊测试
模糊测试是识别软件错误和漏洞的常用方法。然而,目前在并发环境中改进模糊测试的方法往往缺乏对程序并发状态空间的详细分析。这导致先前已验证过的并发状态的执行效率低下和信息遗漏。我们开发了 TSAFL,这是一种新型并发模糊框架,旨在检测并发程序的运行状态并发现难以发现的漏洞。TSAFL 以 AFL 的并发漏洞检测能力为基础,融入了三项新技术。首先,我们引入了两个新的覆盖指标来衡量并发性:并发行为窗口和 CFG 预测。这些指标增强了 TSAFL 探索更多线程交错的能力。第二项技术将高效的线程交错调度与周期调度相结合。我们提出了几种方法,以避免单纯使用周期调度来准确检测和验证所有并发状态空间所带来的问题。第三,我们根据并发模糊测试的特点提出了一种多目标优化机制,以充分利用种子文件中的信息。利用这三种技术,我们的并发模糊方法能有效地利用具体的上下文信息覆盖不常见的线程交错。我们在用户级应用上对 TSAFL 进行了评估,实验表明 TSAFL 在多线程相关种子生成和并发漏洞检测方面优于 AFL++ 和 MOPT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Security
Computers & Security 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
365
审稿时长
10.7 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Security is the most respected technical journal in the IT security field. With its high-profile editorial board and informative regular features and columns, the journal is essential reading for IT security professionals around the world. Computers & Security provides you with a unique blend of leading edge research and sound practical management advice. It is aimed at the professional involved with computer security, audit, control and data integrity in all sectors - industry, commerce and academia. Recognized worldwide as THE primary source of reference for applied research and technical expertise it is your first step to fully secure systems.
期刊最新文献
GRAIN: Graph neural network and reinforcement learning aided causality discovery for multi-step attack scenario reconstruction Multi-perspective API call sequence behavior analysis and fusion for malware classification Adversarial attacks based on time-series features for traffic detection Thread-sensitive fuzzing for concurrency bug detection Enhanced cell phone security: An ultrasonic and sensor fusion-based persistent cell phone protection method integrating anti-theft & identity authentication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1