Mainland ignorance: Okinawa and Japanese colonial unknowing

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geoforum Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104146
Hidefumi Nishiyama
{"title":"Mainland ignorance: Okinawa and Japanese colonial unknowing","authors":"Hidefumi Nishiyama","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Drawing from Charles Mills’ concept of “white ignorance,” this paper aims to conceptualise and analyse what may be called “mainland ignorance,” which continues to underpin contemporary imperial geopolitical structures. Islands across the world remain colonised and used for political and military interests of metropolitan states.Yet, mainland narratives often ignore such hierarchical and unequal relations and refuse to acknowledge islands’ colonial histories. Departing from existing accounts on the politics of ignorance concerning islands, the paper explores the production of ignorance about Okinawa in Japanese historical narratives. It focuses on the construction of colonial amnesia concerning the so-called Okinawan “mass suicides.” As the Ministry of Education’s censorship of relevant passages in school textbooks in 2007 illustrates, the government officials attempt to conceal the role of the Japanese military, and thus, the state’s complicity in the Okinawan civilian deaths. The analysis extends to how this form of colonial unknowing is rationalised in the face of criticism. Mainland officials do not necessarily deny the occurrences of these events, which would allow for counter-facts. Instead, they rely on uncertainty, which appears to be more effective in imposing ignorance. The article then proceeds to discuss how ignoring the historical event is closely tied to the broader colonial unknowing of Okinawan collective suffering that continues to this day. Main materials to be analysed are debates and discussions at the Diet as well as political statements against the censorship by Okinawan activists and scholars. The article suggests that for understanding the operation of mainland ignorance, and ultimately decolonising it, it is important not only to identify where ignorance concerning colonial islands is made but also to unpack know how ignorance claims are enacted and maintained and implications of ignoring the colonial past to the present. It is hoped that the present study promotes further critical examination of mainland ignorance across different island settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 104146"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524002070","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drawing from Charles Mills’ concept of “white ignorance,” this paper aims to conceptualise and analyse what may be called “mainland ignorance,” which continues to underpin contemporary imperial geopolitical structures. Islands across the world remain colonised and used for political and military interests of metropolitan states.Yet, mainland narratives often ignore such hierarchical and unequal relations and refuse to acknowledge islands’ colonial histories. Departing from existing accounts on the politics of ignorance concerning islands, the paper explores the production of ignorance about Okinawa in Japanese historical narratives. It focuses on the construction of colonial amnesia concerning the so-called Okinawan “mass suicides.” As the Ministry of Education’s censorship of relevant passages in school textbooks in 2007 illustrates, the government officials attempt to conceal the role of the Japanese military, and thus, the state’s complicity in the Okinawan civilian deaths. The analysis extends to how this form of colonial unknowing is rationalised in the face of criticism. Mainland officials do not necessarily deny the occurrences of these events, which would allow for counter-facts. Instead, they rely on uncertainty, which appears to be more effective in imposing ignorance. The article then proceeds to discuss how ignoring the historical event is closely tied to the broader colonial unknowing of Okinawan collective suffering that continues to this day. Main materials to be analysed are debates and discussions at the Diet as well as political statements against the censorship by Okinawan activists and scholars. The article suggests that for understanding the operation of mainland ignorance, and ultimately decolonising it, it is important not only to identify where ignorance concerning colonial islands is made but also to unpack know how ignorance claims are enacted and maintained and implications of ignoring the colonial past to the present. It is hoped that the present study promotes further critical examination of mainland ignorance across different island settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大陆的无知冲绳和日本殖民时期的无知
本文借鉴查尔斯-米尔斯(Charles Mills)的 "白人的无知"(white ignorance)概念,旨在概念化并分析所谓的 "大陆的无知",这种无知继续支撑着当代帝国地缘政治结构。然而,大陆的叙事往往忽视这种等级森严的不平等关系,拒绝承认岛屿的殖民历史。本文从现有关于岛屿无知政治的论述出发,探讨了日本历史叙事中对冲绳的无知。本文重点关注所谓冲绳 "集体自杀 "事件的殖民失忆症的构建。正如 2007 年文部省对教科书中相关段落的审查所表明的那样,政府官员试图掩盖日本军队的角色,从而掩盖国家在冲绳平民死亡事件中的共谋。分析还延伸到面对批评时如何将这种形式的殖民地不知情合理化。大陆官员并不一定否认这些事件的发生,这样就可以反驳事实。相反,他们依靠不确定性,这似乎更有效地强加了无知。文章接着讨论了对历史事件的忽视是如何与更广泛的殖民主义者对冲绳集体苦难的不了解紧密联系在一起的,这种不了解一直持续到今天。分析的主要材料是国会的辩论和讨论,以及冲绳活动家和学者反对审查的政治声明。文章认为,要理解大陆无知的运作,并最终使其非殖民化,重要的是不仅要确定有关殖民岛屿的无知是在哪里产生的,而且要了解无知的主张是如何实施和维持的,以及忽视殖民历史对现在的影响。希望本研究能促进进一步批判性地审视不同岛屿环境中的大陆无知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
期刊最新文献
Mapping the spatial and temporal patterns of housing instability in Malmö Of ships and soundboxes: Contrapuntal explorations of hydrocoloniality and the materiality of music Creative production in the digital age: A network analysis of the digital game industry in China New directions for resilience research: The significance of volume and verticality “Renovate to rent” as a spatio-temporal fix under state entrepreneurialism: Urban renewal through long-term rental apartment development in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1