Unraveling the heterogeneity of pathways linking residential green space quantity and quality to the well-being of older adults in different housing price communities

IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES Cities Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2024.105561
Jinguang Zhang , Tianyu Xia , Yingyi Cheng , Shuai Zhou , Ziying Cai , Bing Zhao , Payam Dadvand
{"title":"Unraveling the heterogeneity of pathways linking residential green space quantity and quality to the well-being of older adults in different housing price communities","authors":"Jinguang Zhang ,&nbsp;Tianyu Xia ,&nbsp;Yingyi Cheng ,&nbsp;Shuai Zhou ,&nbsp;Ziying Cai ,&nbsp;Bing Zhao ,&nbsp;Payam Dadvand","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Preliminary evidence suggests that socioeconomically disadvantaged groups may derive greater health benefits from residential green space (RGS); however, the heterogeneity of the mechanisms underlying the health effects of RGS across socioeconomic status strata remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the association between RGS quantity and quality and subjective well-being (SWB) in older adults, and to unravel the variation in this association and its mechanisms based on housing price levels (as an SES proxy), using a sample of 439 older adults in Nanjing, China. Multivariate linear models and structural equation modeling (SEM) were used to evaluate the association between RGS and SWB and to examine their underlying pathways. Multi-group SEM analysis was employed to investigate the effect modification of SES on these pathways. We found that RGS was positively associated with SWB by promoting physical activity and social cohesion, and by reducing perceived air pollution and noise. Older adults in low-SES communities were more likely to benefit from RGS exposure. These variations could be partially explained by differences in physical activity and social cohesion, which were more pertinent for older adults in low-SES communities. Our findings have implications for green interventions aimed at achieving health equity in underdeveloped urban environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 105561"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124007753","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preliminary evidence suggests that socioeconomically disadvantaged groups may derive greater health benefits from residential green space (RGS); however, the heterogeneity of the mechanisms underlying the health effects of RGS across socioeconomic status strata remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the association between RGS quantity and quality and subjective well-being (SWB) in older adults, and to unravel the variation in this association and its mechanisms based on housing price levels (as an SES proxy), using a sample of 439 older adults in Nanjing, China. Multivariate linear models and structural equation modeling (SEM) were used to evaluate the association between RGS and SWB and to examine their underlying pathways. Multi-group SEM analysis was employed to investigate the effect modification of SES on these pathways. We found that RGS was positively associated with SWB by promoting physical activity and social cohesion, and by reducing perceived air pollution and noise. Older adults in low-SES communities were more likely to benefit from RGS exposure. These variations could be partially explained by differences in physical activity and social cohesion, which were more pertinent for older adults in low-SES communities. Our findings have implications for green interventions aimed at achieving health equity in underdeveloped urban environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭示不同房价社区中居住绿地的数量和质量与老年人福祉之间的联系途径的异质性
初步证据表明,社会经济处境不利的群体可能从居住绿地(RGS)中获得更大的健康益处;然而,不同社会经济地位阶层的 RGS 对健康影响的内在机制的异质性仍不清楚。本研究以中国南京市的 439 名老年人为样本,旨在探讨居住绿地的数量和质量与老年人主观幸福感(SWB)之间的关联,并根据房价水平(作为社会经济地位的代表)揭示这种关联的差异及其机制。研究采用多变量线性模型和结构方程建模(SEM)来评估 RGS 与 SWB 之间的关系,并研究两者之间的内在联系。我们还采用了多组 SEM 分析来研究社会经济地位对这些途径的影响。我们发现,通过促进体育活动和社会凝聚力,以及减少空气污染和噪音,RGS 与 SWB 呈正相关。低社会经济地位社区中的老年人更有可能从接触 RGS 中受益。这些差异可部分归因于体育活动和社会凝聚力的不同,而体育活动和社会凝聚力与低社会经济地位社区的老年人更相关。我们的研究结果对旨在欠发达城市环境中实现健康公平的绿色干预措施具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
期刊最新文献
Strategic emerging enterprises drive city-level carbon emission efficiency in China The spatial dynamics of financial expenditure on science and technology in Chinese cities: Financial capacity and government competition Development agendas governing the common good – Unfolding planning approaches: A case study of Vantaa, Finland Green infrastructure as a planning tool: A comprehensive systematization of urban redesign strategies to increase vegetation within public places Travel sustainability of new build housing in the London region: Can London's Green Belt be developed sustainably?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1