{"title":"Social networks, environmental literacy, and farmers' clean low-carbon farming behaviors: Evidence from villages in China","authors":"Fei Lin, Jisheng Li, Chen Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Under the global climate crisis, in addition to governmental environmental regulations, farmers' behaviors has been recognized as an important part of achieving decarbonization plans in the agricultural sector. While social networks and environmental literacy have been confirmed as key factors influencing Clean Low-Carbon Farming Behavior (CLFB) among farmers, yet few studies have explored their combined effects.</div><div>Based on a dataset of 352 farmers in China, this study examined the relationship between social networks, environmental literacy and farmers' CLFB. First, social networks facilitate the implementation of CLFB through three mechanisms: “information networks”, “reference networks”, and “mutual assistance networks” where network strength, breadth, and height also play promoting roles. Second, environmental literacy and its three levels-nominal literacy, functional literacy, and operational literacy-all promote CLFB, while functional literacy shows the greatest promoting effect. Third, the above conclusions still hold after introducing instrumental variables for endogeneity discussion. Finally, environmental literacy and its three levels partially mediate the impact of social networks on CLFB. The findings have important implications for South and Southeast Asian countries that face the same conflict between food security and decarbonization as China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"228 ","pages":"Article 108439"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924003367","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Under the global climate crisis, in addition to governmental environmental regulations, farmers' behaviors has been recognized as an important part of achieving decarbonization plans in the agricultural sector. While social networks and environmental literacy have been confirmed as key factors influencing Clean Low-Carbon Farming Behavior (CLFB) among farmers, yet few studies have explored their combined effects.
Based on a dataset of 352 farmers in China, this study examined the relationship between social networks, environmental literacy and farmers' CLFB. First, social networks facilitate the implementation of CLFB through three mechanisms: “information networks”, “reference networks”, and “mutual assistance networks” where network strength, breadth, and height also play promoting roles. Second, environmental literacy and its three levels-nominal literacy, functional literacy, and operational literacy-all promote CLFB, while functional literacy shows the greatest promoting effect. Third, the above conclusions still hold after introducing instrumental variables for endogeneity discussion. Finally, environmental literacy and its three levels partially mediate the impact of social networks on CLFB. The findings have important implications for South and Southeast Asian countries that face the same conflict between food security and decarbonization as China.
期刊介绍:
Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership.
Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.