Hongqiang Yan , Shichen Tao , Lijia Xu , Qi Shi , Yongzhi Wang , Meixia Zhao , Shengnan Zhou , Xiaoju Liu
{"title":"Distribution and air-sea fluxes of CO2 in coral reefs in the Greater Bay Area, China","authors":"Hongqiang Yan , Shichen Tao , Lijia Xu , Qi Shi , Yongzhi Wang , Meixia Zhao , Shengnan Zhou , Xiaoju Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.rsma.2024.103895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>From May to June 2021, the sea surface partial pressure of CO<sub>2</sub> (<em>p</em>CO<sub>2</sub>) and air-sea CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes around six coral reefs in the Great Bay Area (contain Pearl River Estuary (PRE) and Daya Bay) were investigated respectively. The distribution of seawater <em>p</em>CO<sub>2</sub> around different coral reefs were quite different. The seawater <em>p</em>CO<sub>2</sub> of the coral reef region of Daya Bay is relatively high, ranging from 268 to 496 µatm. In contrast, the <em>p</em>CO<sub>2</sub> levels in the coral reef area of the PRE are significantly lower, with measurements ranging from 84 to 374 µatm. Further analysis showed that the distribution of seawater <em>p</em>CO<sub>2</sub> around the coral reefs of the PRE were mainly affected by biological metabolism and seawater mixing, while those in Daya Bay were mainly controlled by temperature and seawater mixing. During the survey, the three coral reefs in the PRE were affected by algal blooms showing strong sinks of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> ranging from −12.3 to −19.2 mmol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>. However, the difference between the seawater <em>p</em>CO<sub>2</sub> and atmospheric <em>p</em>CO<sub>2</sub> in the three coral reefs of Daya Bay were all very small, and they were weak sources or sinks of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21070,"journal":{"name":"Regional Studies in Marine Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Studies in Marine Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352485524005280","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
From May to June 2021, the sea surface partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2) and air-sea CO2 fluxes around six coral reefs in the Great Bay Area (contain Pearl River Estuary (PRE) and Daya Bay) were investigated respectively. The distribution of seawater pCO2 around different coral reefs were quite different. The seawater pCO2 of the coral reef region of Daya Bay is relatively high, ranging from 268 to 496 µatm. In contrast, the pCO2 levels in the coral reef area of the PRE are significantly lower, with measurements ranging from 84 to 374 µatm. Further analysis showed that the distribution of seawater pCO2 around the coral reefs of the PRE were mainly affected by biological metabolism and seawater mixing, while those in Daya Bay were mainly controlled by temperature and seawater mixing. During the survey, the three coral reefs in the PRE were affected by algal blooms showing strong sinks of atmospheric CO2 ranging from −12.3 to −19.2 mmol CO2 m−2 d−1. However, the difference between the seawater pCO2 and atmospheric pCO2 in the three coral reefs of Daya Bay were all very small, and they were weak sources or sinks of atmospheric CO2, respectively.
期刊介绍:
REGIONAL STUDIES IN MARINE SCIENCE will publish scientifically sound papers on regional aspects of maritime and marine resources in estuaries, coastal zones, continental shelf, the seas and oceans.