Pervasive biases in proxy genome-wide association studies based on parental history of Alzheimer’s disease

IF 31.7 1区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY Nature genetics Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1038/s41588-024-01963-9
Yuchang Wu, Zhongxuan Sun, Qinwen Zheng, Jiacheng Miao, Stephen Dorn, Shubhabrata Mukherjee, Jason M. Fletcher, Qiongshi Lu
{"title":"Pervasive biases in proxy genome-wide association studies based on parental history of Alzheimer’s disease","authors":"Yuchang Wu, Zhongxuan Sun, Qinwen Zheng, Jiacheng Miao, Stephen Dorn, Shubhabrata Mukherjee, Jason M. Fletcher, Qiongshi Lu","doi":"10.1038/s41588-024-01963-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Almost every recent Alzheimer’s disease (AD) genome-wide association study (GWAS) has performed meta-analysis to combine studies with clinical diagnosis of AD with studies that use proxy phenotypes based on parental disease history. Here, we report major limitations in current GWAS-by-proxy (GWAX) practices due to uncorrected survival bias and nonrandom participation in parental illness surveys, which cause substantial discrepancies between AD GWAS and GWAX results. We demonstrate that the current AD GWAX provide highly misleading genetic correlations between AD risk and higher education, which subsequently affects a variety of genetic epidemiological applications involving AD and cognition. Our study sheds light on potential issues in the design and analysis of middle-aged biobank cohorts and underscores the need for caution when interpreting genetic association results based on proxy-reported parental disease history.</p>","PeriodicalId":18985,"journal":{"name":"Nature genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":31.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-024-01963-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Almost every recent Alzheimer’s disease (AD) genome-wide association study (GWAS) has performed meta-analysis to combine studies with clinical diagnosis of AD with studies that use proxy phenotypes based on parental disease history. Here, we report major limitations in current GWAS-by-proxy (GWAX) practices due to uncorrected survival bias and nonrandom participation in parental illness surveys, which cause substantial discrepancies between AD GWAS and GWAX results. We demonstrate that the current AD GWAX provide highly misleading genetic correlations between AD risk and higher education, which subsequently affects a variety of genetic epidemiological applications involving AD and cognition. Our study sheds light on potential issues in the design and analysis of middle-aged biobank cohorts and underscores the need for caution when interpreting genetic association results based on proxy-reported parental disease history.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于父母阿尔茨海默病病史的代理全基因组关联研究中普遍存在的偏差
几乎所有最新的阿尔茨海默病(AD)全基因组关联研究(GWAS)都进行了荟萃分析,将临床诊断为AD的研究与使用基于父母疾病史的替代表型的研究结合起来。在此,我们报告了目前通过代理进行 GWAS(GWAX)研究的主要局限性,这些局限性是由于未校正的生存偏倚和非随机参与的父母疾病调查造成的,它们导致了 AD GWAS 和 GWAX 结果之间的巨大差异。我们证明,目前的 AD GWAX 在 AD 风险与高等教育之间提供了极具误导性的遗传相关性,进而影响了涉及 AD 和认知的各种遗传流行病学应用。我们的研究揭示了中年生物库队列的设计和分析中可能存在的问题,并强调在解释基于近亲报告的父母疾病史的遗传关联结果时需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nature genetics
Nature genetics 生物-遗传学
CiteScore
43.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
241
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Nature Genetics publishes the very highest quality research in genetics. It encompasses genetic and functional genomic studies on human and plant traits and on other model organisms. Current emphasis is on the genetic basis for common and complex diseases and on the functional mechanism, architecture and evolution of gene networks, studied by experimental perturbation. Integrative genetic topics comprise, but are not limited to: -Genes in the pathology of human disease -Molecular analysis of simple and complex genetic traits -Cancer genetics -Agricultural genomics -Developmental genetics -Regulatory variation in gene expression -Strategies and technologies for extracting function from genomic data -Pharmacological genomics -Genome evolution
期刊最新文献
Grapevine pangenome facilitates trait genetics and genomic breeding The ZmCPK39–ZmDi19–ZmPR10 immune module regulates quantitative resistance to multiple foliar diseases in maize Pervasive biases in proxy genome-wide association studies based on parental history of Alzheimer’s disease Author Correction: Systematic assessment of ISWI subunits shows that NURF creates local accessibility for CTCF Gene-based burden tests of rare germline variants identify six cancer susceptibility genes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1