Molecular docking and dynamics simulation analysis of PDE5 inhibitor candidates for erectile dysfunction treatment.

N Akdogan, R Rawat, T Ozden, F Uzan, M Deger, I O Yılmaz, T Ates, I A Arıdogan
{"title":"Molecular docking and dynamics simulation analysis of PDE5 inhibitor candidates for erectile dysfunction treatment.","authors":"N Akdogan, R Rawat, T Ozden, F Uzan, M Deger, I O Yılmaz, T Ates, I A Arıdogan","doi":"10.26355/eurrev_202410_36865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Molecular docking studies were conducted to assess the binding affinities of five potential inhibitor candidates [PDB (Protein Data Bank) ID: 6L6E] against Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5), with Sildenafil used as the reference compound. The aim of this study is to reveal the potential inhibitory role of plant-derived compounds compared to Sildenafil, a PDE5 inhibitor.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Autodock Vina v. 1.2.5 software was used to dock the protein and each ligand individually. Molecular dynamics simulations assessed the binding affinity of two compounds to the Phosphodiesterase 5A1 (PDE5 A1) enzyme and were carried out using GROMACS 2022.2 RESULTS: Boesenbergin A exhibited the highest affinity at -8.8 kcal/mol, followed by Ginkolide B at -8.5 kcal/mol, Sildenafil at -8.1 kcal/mol, Montanol at -7.8 kcal/mol, Beta-sitosterol at -7.1 kcal/mol, and Eugenol acetate at -6.9 kcal/mol, ranked in descending order. As a result of molecular docking studies, molecular dynamic simulations were performed for Boesenbergin A, which has the highest affinity, and Sildenafil, which is the standard molecule.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among the two ligands tested, Boesenbergin A exhibited superior binding affinity, surpassing even the standard molecule, Sildenafil. This suggests their potential for modulating enzyme activity and potential relevance in erectile dysfunction treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12152,"journal":{"name":"European review for medical and pharmacological sciences","volume":"28 20","pages":"4420-4430"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European review for medical and pharmacological sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202410_36865","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Molecular docking studies were conducted to assess the binding affinities of five potential inhibitor candidates [PDB (Protein Data Bank) ID: 6L6E] against Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5), with Sildenafil used as the reference compound. The aim of this study is to reveal the potential inhibitory role of plant-derived compounds compared to Sildenafil, a PDE5 inhibitor.

Materials and methods: Autodock Vina v. 1.2.5 software was used to dock the protein and each ligand individually. Molecular dynamics simulations assessed the binding affinity of two compounds to the Phosphodiesterase 5A1 (PDE5 A1) enzyme and were carried out using GROMACS 2022.2 RESULTS: Boesenbergin A exhibited the highest affinity at -8.8 kcal/mol, followed by Ginkolide B at -8.5 kcal/mol, Sildenafil at -8.1 kcal/mol, Montanol at -7.8 kcal/mol, Beta-sitosterol at -7.1 kcal/mol, and Eugenol acetate at -6.9 kcal/mol, ranked in descending order. As a result of molecular docking studies, molecular dynamic simulations were performed for Boesenbergin A, which has the highest affinity, and Sildenafil, which is the standard molecule.

Conclusions: Among the two ligands tested, Boesenbergin A exhibited superior binding affinity, surpassing even the standard molecule, Sildenafil. This suggests their potential for modulating enzyme activity and potential relevance in erectile dysfunction treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于治疗勃起功能障碍的 PDE5 候选抑制剂的分子对接和动力学模拟分析。
研究目的以西地那非(Sildenafil)为参照化合物,进行分子对接研究,评估五种潜在候选抑制剂[PDB(蛋白质数据库)ID:6L6E]与磷酸二酯酶5(PDE5)的结合亲和力。本研究的目的是揭示植物源化合物与 PDE5 抑制剂西地那非相比的潜在抑制作用:使用 Autodock Vina v. 1.2.5 软件分别对接蛋白质和每种配体。分子动力学模拟评估了两种化合物与磷酸二酯酶 5A1 (PDE5 A1) 酶的结合亲和力,并使用 GROMACS 2022 进行了模拟。8 kcal/mol,其次是银杏内酯 B(-8.5 kcal/mol)、西地那非(-8.1 kcal/mol)、蒙脱石醇(-7.8 kcal/mol)、β-谷甾醇(-7.1 kcal/mol)和醋酸丁香酚(-6.9 kcal/mol)。作为分子对接研究的结果,对亲和力最高的 Boesenbergin A 和标准分子西地那非进行了分子动力学模拟:结论:在测试的两种配体中,Boesenbergin A 表现出更高的结合亲和力,甚至超过了标准分子西地那非。结论:在测试的两种配体中,Boesenbergin A 表现出更强的结合亲和力,甚至超过了标准分子西地那非,这表明它们具有调节酶活性的潜力和治疗勃起功能障碍的潜在相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
906
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, a fortnightly journal, acts as an information exchange tool on several aspects of medical and pharmacological sciences. It publishes reviews, original articles, and results from original research. The purposes of the Journal are to encourage interdisciplinary discussions and to contribute to the advancement of medicine. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences includes: -Editorials- Reviews- Original articles- Trials- Brief communications- Case reports (only if of particular interest and accompanied by a short review)
期刊最新文献
Comparison of regimens targeting complete remission in the first-line treatment of acute myeloid leukemia patients. Diuretic activity of ethanolic extract and fraction enriched in saponins from Solanum sisymbriifolium Lam. root in rats. Evaluation of adropin level and insulin resistance in non-alcoholic fatty liver patients: a meta-analysis of studies. The possible role of serum NGAL and MMP-9 in the assessment of kidney impairment and cardiovascular risk in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus or obesity. Exploring factors influencing COVID-19 severity: a matched case-control study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1