Comparing Powered Wheelchair Driving Characteristics of Real Driving and Two Types of Simulated Driving

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3481277
Myeonghwan Bang;Min A Kim;Myung Joon Lim;Hyoung Seop Kim
{"title":"Comparing Powered Wheelchair Driving Characteristics of Real Driving and Two Types of Simulated Driving","authors":"Myeonghwan Bang;Min A Kim;Myung Joon Lim;Hyoung Seop Kim","doi":"10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3481277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We aimed to gather evidence on the feasibility of using simulator-based driving assessments for prescribing powered mobility devices (PMDs). Therefore, we compared the driving characteristics of real driving and two types of simulated driving. Thirty participants with difficulty walking more than 100 meters independently were enrolled. We developed a full-cabin and desktop simulator and created driving scenarios that closely resembled a real driving route in a park. They participated in three separate driving sessions, each using a powered wheelchair, full-cabin simulator, and desktop simulator. The driving characteristics, such as driving distance, mean speed, and standard deviation (SD) of speed, were obtained and analyzed to assess differences and correlations. Statistically significant differences were found in the driving distance and the SD of speed, respectively. However, for the mean speed, there was no statistically significant difference among the three types of driving. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the driving distance was 0.154, which was not statistically significant. However, for mean speed, the ICC was 0.752, indicating a strong correlation. The ICC for the SD of speed was 0.562, indicating a moderate correlation. We demonstrated that the two types of simulators have characteristics that are similar to real-world driving characteristics. The mean speed showed the highest similarity, and the SD of the speed showed a moderate degree of similarity. These results highlight the significant potential of employing simulator-based driving to evaluate the use of PMDs.","PeriodicalId":13419,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","volume":"32 ","pages":"3987-3992"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10742429","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10742429/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed to gather evidence on the feasibility of using simulator-based driving assessments for prescribing powered mobility devices (PMDs). Therefore, we compared the driving characteristics of real driving and two types of simulated driving. Thirty participants with difficulty walking more than 100 meters independently were enrolled. We developed a full-cabin and desktop simulator and created driving scenarios that closely resembled a real driving route in a park. They participated in three separate driving sessions, each using a powered wheelchair, full-cabin simulator, and desktop simulator. The driving characteristics, such as driving distance, mean speed, and standard deviation (SD) of speed, were obtained and analyzed to assess differences and correlations. Statistically significant differences were found in the driving distance and the SD of speed, respectively. However, for the mean speed, there was no statistically significant difference among the three types of driving. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the driving distance was 0.154, which was not statistically significant. However, for mean speed, the ICC was 0.752, indicating a strong correlation. The ICC for the SD of speed was 0.562, indicating a moderate correlation. We demonstrated that the two types of simulators have characteristics that are similar to real-world driving characteristics. The mean speed showed the highest similarity, and the SD of the speed showed a moderate degree of similarity. These results highlight the significant potential of employing simulator-based driving to evaluate the use of PMDs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较电动轮椅在实际驾驶和两种模拟驾驶中的特点。
我们的目的是收集证据,证明在开具助行器具处方时使用模拟驾驶评估的可行性。因此,我们比较了真实驾驶和两种模拟驾驶的驾驶特性。我们招募了 30 名独立行走 100 米以上有困难的参与者。我们开发了全舱和桌面模拟器,并创建了与公园中真实驾驶路线非常相似的驾驶场景。他们分别使用电动轮椅、全座舱模拟器和桌面模拟器进行了三次驾驶训练。对驾驶距离、平均速度和速度标准偏差(SD)等驾驶特征进行了采集和分析,以评估差异和相关性。结果发现,驾驶距离和速度标准偏差在统计学上存在明显差异。然而,在平均速度方面,三种驾驶方式之间没有统计学意义上的显著差异。驾驶距离的类内相关系数(ICC)为 0.154,无统计学意义。然而,平均速度的 ICC 为 0.752,表明相关性很强。速度标差的 ICC 为 0.562,表明相关性适中。我们证明,这两种模拟器的特性与真实世界的驾驶特性相似。平均速度显示出最高的相似性,速度的 SD 显示出中等程度的相似性。这些结果凸显了采用模拟器驾驶来评估 PMD 使用情况的巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
8.20%
发文量
479
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitative and neural aspects of biomedical engineering, including functional electrical stimulation, acoustic dynamics, human performance measurement and analysis, nerve stimulation, electromyography, motor control and stimulation; and hardware and software applications for rehabilitation engineering and assistive devices.
期刊最新文献
Semi-Autonomous Continuous Robotic Arm Control Using an Augmented Reality Brain-Computer Interface Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Stimulation on Fingertip Can Evoke Fine Tactile Sensations and Different Local Hemodynamic Responses The Neural Basis of the Effect of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Emotion Regulation Related Brain Regions: An rs-fMRI Study An Asynchronous Training-free SSVEP-BCI Detection Algorithm for Non-Equal Prior Probability Scenarios. A Swing-Assist Controller for Enhancing Knee Flexion in a Semi-Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1