Faith Myers, Reedhi Dasani, Jacklin Tong, Shelby Vallandingham-Lee, Christine Manipon, Alex Dahlen, Daniele De Luca, Yogen Singh, Alexis S Davis, Valerie Y Chock, Shazia Bhombal
{"title":"Point-of-care lung ultrasound for continuous positive airway pressure discontinuation in preterm infants.","authors":"Faith Myers, Reedhi Dasani, Jacklin Tong, Shelby Vallandingham-Lee, Christine Manipon, Alex Dahlen, Daniele De Luca, Yogen Singh, Alexis S Davis, Valerie Y Chock, Shazia Bhombal","doi":"10.1038/s41372-024-02157-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if the lung ultrasound score (LUS) is predictive of successful continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) discontinuation in preterm neonates born <32 weeks' gestation with history of respiratory distress syndrome.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study of preterm infants requiring CPAP. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression performed to formulate a predictive score using clinical variables with and without LUS. Area under the curve (AUC) was compared to determine the added predictive ability of LUS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one patients with discontinuation attempts associated with a LUS were included. Lower LUS obtained within 0-7 days prior to CPAP discontinuation was associated with successful CPAP discontinuation (OR 0.46 [0.23, 0.91]; p = 0.025). Cross-validated AUC for clinical variables alone (Model 1) was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.74-0.93) versus 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81-0.97) when LUS was incorporated (Model 2, p < 0.001). AUC of LUS alone was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.68-0.93, p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In preterm infants requiring CPAP, LUS aids in the prediction of successful CPAP discontinuation and may significantly improve a predictive tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":16690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-02157-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To determine if the lung ultrasound score (LUS) is predictive of successful continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) discontinuation in preterm neonates born <32 weeks' gestation with history of respiratory distress syndrome.
Study design: Retrospective study of preterm infants requiring CPAP. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression performed to formulate a predictive score using clinical variables with and without LUS. Area under the curve (AUC) was compared to determine the added predictive ability of LUS.
Results: Forty-one patients with discontinuation attempts associated with a LUS were included. Lower LUS obtained within 0-7 days prior to CPAP discontinuation was associated with successful CPAP discontinuation (OR 0.46 [0.23, 0.91]; p = 0.025). Cross-validated AUC for clinical variables alone (Model 1) was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.74-0.93) versus 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81-0.97) when LUS was incorporated (Model 2, p < 0.001). AUC of LUS alone was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.68-0.93, p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: In preterm infants requiring CPAP, LUS aids in the prediction of successful CPAP discontinuation and may significantly improve a predictive tool.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Perinatology provides members of the perinatal/neonatal healthcare team with original information pertinent to improving maternal/fetal and neonatal care. We publish peer-reviewed clinical research articles, state-of-the art reviews, comments, quality improvement reports, and letters to the editor. Articles published in the Journal of Perinatology embrace the full scope of the specialty, including clinical, professional, political, administrative and educational aspects. The Journal also explores legal and ethical issues, neonatal technology and product development.
The Journal’s audience includes all those that participate in perinatal/neonatal care, including, but not limited to neonatologists, perinatologists, perinatal epidemiologists, pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists, surgeons, neonatal and perinatal nurses, respiratory therapists, pharmacists, social workers, dieticians, speech and hearing experts, other allied health professionals, as well as subspecialists who participate in patient care including radiologists, laboratory medicine and pathologists.