Point-of-care lung ultrasound for continuous positive airway pressure discontinuation in preterm infants.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Perinatology Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1038/s41372-024-02157-1
Faith Myers, Reedhi Dasani, Jacklin Tong, Shelby Vallandingham-Lee, Christine Manipon, Alex Dahlen, Daniele De Luca, Yogen Singh, Alexis S Davis, Valerie Y Chock, Shazia Bhombal
{"title":"Point-of-care lung ultrasound for continuous positive airway pressure discontinuation in preterm infants.","authors":"Faith Myers, Reedhi Dasani, Jacklin Tong, Shelby Vallandingham-Lee, Christine Manipon, Alex Dahlen, Daniele De Luca, Yogen Singh, Alexis S Davis, Valerie Y Chock, Shazia Bhombal","doi":"10.1038/s41372-024-02157-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if the lung ultrasound score (LUS) is predictive of successful continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) discontinuation in preterm neonates born <32 weeks' gestation with history of respiratory distress syndrome.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study of preterm infants requiring CPAP. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression performed to formulate a predictive score using clinical variables with and without LUS. Area under the curve (AUC) was compared to determine the added predictive ability of LUS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one patients with discontinuation attempts associated with a LUS were included. Lower LUS obtained within 0-7 days prior to CPAP discontinuation was associated with successful CPAP discontinuation (OR 0.46 [0.23, 0.91]; p = 0.025). Cross-validated AUC for clinical variables alone (Model 1) was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.74-0.93) versus 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81-0.97) when LUS was incorporated (Model 2, p < 0.001). AUC of LUS alone was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.68-0.93, p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In preterm infants requiring CPAP, LUS aids in the prediction of successful CPAP discontinuation and may significantly improve a predictive tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":16690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-02157-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine if the lung ultrasound score (LUS) is predictive of successful continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) discontinuation in preterm neonates born <32 weeks' gestation with history of respiratory distress syndrome.

Study design: Retrospective study of preterm infants requiring CPAP. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression performed to formulate a predictive score using clinical variables with and without LUS. Area under the curve (AUC) was compared to determine the added predictive ability of LUS.

Results: Forty-one patients with discontinuation attempts associated with a LUS were included. Lower LUS obtained within 0-7 days prior to CPAP discontinuation was associated with successful CPAP discontinuation (OR 0.46 [0.23, 0.91]; p = 0.025). Cross-validated AUC for clinical variables alone (Model 1) was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.74-0.93) versus 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81-0.97) when LUS was incorporated (Model 2, p < 0.001). AUC of LUS alone was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.68-0.93, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: In preterm infants requiring CPAP, LUS aids in the prediction of successful CPAP discontinuation and may significantly improve a predictive tool.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早产儿停止持续气道正压治疗时的护理点肺部超声波检查。
研究目的研究设计:对需要使用 CPAP 的早产儿进行回顾性研究。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归法,利用有无 LUS 的临床变量制定预测评分。比较曲线下面积(AUC)以确定 LUS 的附加预测能力:结果:纳入了 41 例因 LUS 而尝试停药的患者。停用 CPAP 前 0-7 天内获得的较低 LUS 与成功停用 CPAP 相关(OR 0.46 [0.23, 0.91]; p = 0.025)。单独使用临床变量(模型 1)的交叉验证 AUC 为 0.85(95% CI:0.74-0.93),而加入 LUS 后为 0.90(95% CI:0.81-0.97)(模型 2,p 结论):对于需要使用 CPAP 的早产儿,LUS 有助于预测 CPAP 的成功停用,并可显著改善预测工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatology
Journal of Perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
284
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatology provides members of the perinatal/neonatal healthcare team with original information pertinent to improving maternal/fetal and neonatal care. We publish peer-reviewed clinical research articles, state-of-the art reviews, comments, quality improvement reports, and letters to the editor. Articles published in the Journal of Perinatology embrace the full scope of the specialty, including clinical, professional, political, administrative and educational aspects. The Journal also explores legal and ethical issues, neonatal technology and product development. The Journal’s audience includes all those that participate in perinatal/neonatal care, including, but not limited to neonatologists, perinatologists, perinatal epidemiologists, pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists, surgeons, neonatal and perinatal nurses, respiratory therapists, pharmacists, social workers, dieticians, speech and hearing experts, other allied health professionals, as well as subspecialists who participate in patient care including radiologists, laboratory medicine and pathologists.
期刊最新文献
The road to sensory deprivation in the NICU is paved with good intentions: defining an optimal environment of care. Response of the ductus arteriosus to acetaminophen or indomethacin in extremely low birth weight infants. Nebulized salbutamol for the treatment of transient tachypnea of the newborn: a randomized controlled trial. Bemiparin in neonatal thrombosis: therapeutic dosing and safety. The feasibility of virtual home visits to address unmet needs after NICU discharge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1