Different approach to M descriptor for future staging of oligometastatic disease in SCLC: A cross-sectional survival analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical & Translational Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1007/s12094-024-03778-w
Melahat Uzel Şener, Pınar Akın Kabalak, Suna Kavurgacı, Nilgün Yılmaz Demirci, Derya Kızılgöz, Fazlı Yanık, Sinem Ermin, Yasemin Söyler, Yekta Altemur Karamustafaoğlu, Demet Türkay Pakna, Ahmet Dumanlı, Ülkü Yılmaz
{"title":"Different approach to M descriptor for future staging of oligometastatic disease in SCLC: A cross-sectional survival analysis.","authors":"Melahat Uzel Şener, Pınar Akın Kabalak, Suna Kavurgacı, Nilgün Yılmaz Demirci, Derya Kızılgöz, Fazlı Yanık, Sinem Ermin, Yasemin Söyler, Yekta Altemur Karamustafaoğlu, Demet Türkay Pakna, Ahmet Dumanlı, Ülkü Yılmaz","doi":"10.1007/s12094-024-03778-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the impact of oligometastasis and the M descriptor on survival in small cell lung cancer (SCLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective study included patients with newly diagnosed extensive-stage SCLC(ES-SCLC) from 2010 to 2020. Subgroups: Group 1: single metastasis in a single organ, Group 2: 2-5 metastases in a single organ, Group 3: 6 or more metastases in a single organ, and Group 4: metastases in two or more organs. This classification was based on the 9th Staging-M descriptor. Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the 439 patients was 62 ± 10 years, and 89.5% of them were male. The mean PFS for Groups 1, 2, 3, 4 was 10.7 months (95% CI 8.9-12.5), 7.5 months (95% CI 5.6-9.4), 4.3 months (95% CI 2.9-5.7), and 5.4 months (95% CI 4.7-6.1), respectively. PFS in Group 2 was significantly higher. The mean OS for Groups 1, 2, 3, 4 was 13.3 months (95% CI 11.2-15.3), 9.5 months (95% CI 7.1-11.9), 7.1 months (95% CI 4.5-9.7), and 6.9 months (95% CI 6.0-7.9), respectively. OS in Group 1 was significantly higher. OS and PFS in the M1b group were significantly higher than in the M1c1 and M1c2 groups (p < 0.05) with no statistical difference between the M1c1 and M1c2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is no significant difference in survival between the M1c1 and M1c2 groups. In ES-SCLC, the number of metastases may be a more predictive factor for prognosis than the number of metastatic organs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03778-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the impact of oligometastasis and the M descriptor on survival in small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study included patients with newly diagnosed extensive-stage SCLC(ES-SCLC) from 2010 to 2020. Subgroups: Group 1: single metastasis in a single organ, Group 2: 2-5 metastases in a single organ, Group 3: 6 or more metastases in a single organ, and Group 4: metastases in two or more organs. This classification was based on the 9th Staging-M descriptor. Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses were conducted.

Results: The mean age of the 439 patients was 62 ± 10 years, and 89.5% of them were male. The mean PFS for Groups 1, 2, 3, 4 was 10.7 months (95% CI 8.9-12.5), 7.5 months (95% CI 5.6-9.4), 4.3 months (95% CI 2.9-5.7), and 5.4 months (95% CI 4.7-6.1), respectively. PFS in Group 2 was significantly higher. The mean OS for Groups 1, 2, 3, 4 was 13.3 months (95% CI 11.2-15.3), 9.5 months (95% CI 7.1-11.9), 7.1 months (95% CI 4.5-9.7), and 6.9 months (95% CI 6.0-7.9), respectively. OS in Group 1 was significantly higher. OS and PFS in the M1b group were significantly higher than in the M1c1 and M1c2 groups (p < 0.05) with no statistical difference between the M1c1 and M1c2 groups.

Conclusion: There is no significant difference in survival between the M1c1 and M1c2 groups. In ES-SCLC, the number of metastases may be a more predictive factor for prognosis than the number of metastatic organs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用不同的 M 描述因子对 SCLC 中的寡转移性疾病进行未来分期:横断面生存分析
目的:本研究旨在探讨寡转移和M描述因子对小细胞肺癌(SCLC)生存期的影响:这项多中心回顾性研究纳入了2010年至2020年新诊断的广泛期SCLC(ES-SCLC)患者。分组:第1组:单个器官有转移;第2组:单个器官有2-5个转移;第3组:单个器官有6个或更多转移;第4组:两个或更多器官有转移。这一分类是根据第 9 次分期-M 描述法进行的。进行了三年无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)分析:439名患者的平均年龄为(62±10)岁,89.5%为男性。第1、2、3、4组的平均生存期分别为10.7个月(95% CI 8.9-12.5)、7.5个月(95% CI 5.6-9.4)、4.3个月(95% CI 2.9-5.7)和5.4个月(95% CI 4.7-6.1)。第 2 组的 PFS 明显更高。第1、2、3、4组的平均OS分别为13.3个月(95% CI 11.2-15.3)、9.5个月(95% CI 7.1-11.9)、7.1个月(95% CI 4.5-9.7)和6.9个月(95% CI 6.0-7.9)。第一组的 OS 明显更高。M1b组的OS和PFS明显高于M1c1组和M1c2组(P 结论:M1b组的OS和PFS明显高于M1c1组和M1c2组:M1c1组和M1c2组的生存率无明显差异。在 ES-SCLC 中,转移灶的数量可能比转移器官的数量更能预测预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
240
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Oncology is an international journal devoted to fostering interaction between experimental and clinical oncology. It covers all aspects of research on cancer, from the more basic discoveries dealing with both cell and molecular biology of tumour cells, to the most advanced clinical assays of conventional and new drugs. In addition, the journal has a strong commitment to facilitating the transfer of knowledge from the basic laboratory to the clinical practice, with the publication of educational series devoted to closing the gap between molecular and clinical oncologists. Molecular biology of tumours, identification of new targets for cancer therapy, and new technologies for research and treatment of cancer are the major themes covered by the educational series. Full research articles on a broad spectrum of subjects, including the molecular and cellular bases of disease, aetiology, pathophysiology, pathology, epidemiology, clinical features, and the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cancer, will be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Epidemiologic trends and survival outcomes in patients with primary digestive system lymphoma in the United States. Different approach to M descriptor for future staging of oligometastatic disease in SCLC: A cross-sectional survival analysis. A real‑world study of clinical characteristics, treatment sequence and outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations. A systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular disease risk with degarelix and GnRH agonists in prostate cancer. Degradation fragments of Tau and type IV collagen as serum biomarkers in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with nivolumab and bevacizumab.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1