Do we really need to drill through the intact ocean crust?

IF 8.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Geoscience frontiers Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1016/j.gsf.2024.101954
{"title":"Do we really need to drill through the intact ocean crust?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gsf.2024.101954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We must persevere to drill through the intact ocean crust to fully address fundamental questions towards completion of the plate tectonics theory. The primary questions include: what is the ocean crust made up of, how thick is it and what is the petrological nature of the crust-mantle boundary (i.e., Mohorovičić discontinuity or Moho)? These questions may sound naive because they are widely believed to be well-understood facts, but they are not. Correctly, our current knowledge remains incomplete, and some popular misperceptions come from interpretations based on convenient assumptions. One assumption is that the ocean crust inferred from seismic data is of magmatic origin. Testing this assumption is a principal motivation of <em>Project Mohole</em> (1957–1966), attempting to drill intact ocean crust across the Moho into the mantle. <em>Project Mohole</em> failed because of its high cost, engineering challenges and insufficient tries, but the technologies developed made subsequent ocean drilling successful. However, answers to the original questions remain unsatisfactory. For example, seismic crust interpreted to be of magmatic origin is shown to have globally uniform thickness of 6.0 ± 1.0 km, but crust with such thickness at many slow-spreading ridge segments is dominated by serpentinized mantle peridotites exposed on seafloors. Therefore, the popular view on ocean ridge magmatism must be re-examined, which needs intact ocean crust drilling into the mantle. Drilling at geologically simple sites in the fast-spreading Pacific seafloor is most promising.</div><div>The US-led <em>D/V JOIDES Resolution</em> that has well served the scientific ocean drilling since 1985 is to retire by the end of 2024, but timely the Chinese geoscience community wishes to continue this international endeavor using the purpose-built <em>D/V Meng Xiang</em> to be in service in 2025. The international community is to gather in November 24–27, 2024, Guangzhou, China, to discuss strategies on where and how to successfully drill intact ocean crust across the Moho in coming years.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12711,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience frontiers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987124001786","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We must persevere to drill through the intact ocean crust to fully address fundamental questions towards completion of the plate tectonics theory. The primary questions include: what is the ocean crust made up of, how thick is it and what is the petrological nature of the crust-mantle boundary (i.e., Mohorovičić discontinuity or Moho)? These questions may sound naive because they are widely believed to be well-understood facts, but they are not. Correctly, our current knowledge remains incomplete, and some popular misperceptions come from interpretations based on convenient assumptions. One assumption is that the ocean crust inferred from seismic data is of magmatic origin. Testing this assumption is a principal motivation of Project Mohole (1957–1966), attempting to drill intact ocean crust across the Moho into the mantle. Project Mohole failed because of its high cost, engineering challenges and insufficient tries, but the technologies developed made subsequent ocean drilling successful. However, answers to the original questions remain unsatisfactory. For example, seismic crust interpreted to be of magmatic origin is shown to have globally uniform thickness of 6.0 ± 1.0 km, but crust with such thickness at many slow-spreading ridge segments is dominated by serpentinized mantle peridotites exposed on seafloors. Therefore, the popular view on ocean ridge magmatism must be re-examined, which needs intact ocean crust drilling into the mantle. Drilling at geologically simple sites in the fast-spreading Pacific seafloor is most promising.
The US-led D/V JOIDES Resolution that has well served the scientific ocean drilling since 1985 is to retire by the end of 2024, but timely the Chinese geoscience community wishes to continue this international endeavor using the purpose-built D/V Meng Xiang to be in service in 2025. The international community is to gather in November 24–27, 2024, Guangzhou, China, to discuss strategies on where and how to successfully drill intact ocean crust across the Moho in coming years.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们真的需要钻穿完整的海洋地壳吗?
我们必须坚持不懈地钻探完整的大洋地壳,以充分解决基本问题,从而完成板块构造理论。主要问题包括:大洋地壳由什么构成,有多厚,地壳-地幔边界(即莫霍洛维奇不连续面或莫霍面)的岩石学性质如何?这些问题听起来可能很天真,因为人们普遍认为这些问题都是很好理解的事实,但事实并非如此。正确地说,我们目前的知识仍不完整,一些流行的误解来自基于简单假设的解释。其中一个假设是,从地震数据推断出的海洋地壳来源于岩浆。测试这一假设是莫霍尔计划(1957-1966 年)的主要动机,该计划试图钻探完整的洋壳,穿过莫霍尔进入地幔。由于成本高昂、工程困难和尝试不足,莫霍尔项目失败了,但所开发的技术使随后的大洋钻探取得了成功。然而,最初问题的答案仍不令人满意。例如,被解释为岩浆起源的地震地壳的全球均匀厚度为 6.0 ± 1.0 千米,但在许多缓慢扩张的海脊段,具有这种厚度的地壳主要是暴露在海床上的蛇纹岩化地幔橄榄岩。因此,必须重新审视关于洋脊岩浆活动的流行观点,这需要对地幔进行完整的洋壳钻探。自 1985 年以来一直为大洋科学钻探提供良好服务的美国 "乔伊德斯决议 "号钻井船将于 2024 年底退役,但中国地球科学界及时希望利用专门建造的 "梦翔 "号钻井船(将于 2025 年服役)继续这一国际努力。国际社会将于 2024 年 11 月 24 日至 27 日齐聚中国广州,就未来几年在何处以及如何成功钻探穿越莫霍面的完整洋壳展开战略讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoscience frontiers
Geoscience frontiers Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
17.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
147
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Geoscience Frontiers (GSF) is the Journal of China University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking University. It publishes peer-reviewed research articles and reviews in interdisciplinary fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences. GSF covers various research areas including petrology and geochemistry, lithospheric architecture and mantle dynamics, global tectonics, economic geology and fuel exploration, geophysics, stratigraphy and paleontology, environmental and engineering geology, astrogeology, and the nexus of resources-energy-emissions-climate under Sustainable Development Goals. The journal aims to bridge innovative, provocative, and challenging concepts and models in these fields, providing insights on correlations and evolution.
期刊最新文献
Do we really need to drill through the intact ocean crust? Two phases of granulite-facies metamorphism superimposied on retrograde eclogite: Constraints on the early Paleozoic tectonic evolution of the Qinling Orogenic Belt, central China Paleogeographic significance of unknown hyperextended continental crust in South Atlantic conjugated margin Linking basin-scale hydrology with climatic parameters in western Himalaya: Application of satellite data, temperature index modelling and in-situ observations Does energy policy uncertainty matter for renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies? An affordable and clean energy perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1