Robust ordering, production, and replenishment in a supply chain for innovative products: A two-echelon newsvendor problem with partial information in yield and demand

IF 9.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL International Journal of Production Economics Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109414
Yujie Zhao , Hong Zhou , Kai Kang , Bingsheng Liu
{"title":"Robust ordering, production, and replenishment in a supply chain for innovative products: A two-echelon newsvendor problem with partial information in yield and demand","authors":"Yujie Zhao ,&nbsp;Hong Zhou ,&nbsp;Kai Kang ,&nbsp;Bingsheng Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With partial yield and demand information, we investigate a two-echelon newsvendor problem in a supply chain for innovative product, in which the retailer and the supplier make sequential decisions in ordering, production, and replenishment, respectively. We adopt the minimax-regret criterion to assume the risk-averse nature and deduce the minimax-regret inventory decisions. We explore replenishment (emergency) production strategies for the supplier. Then we propose shortage penalty strategies as well as subsidized replenishment strategies for the retailer so that the supplier can maintain the required supply even under higher replenishment production costs. We further reveal the role of information uncertainty in the minimax-regret decisions and the bullwhip effect. Interestingly, the results show that the penalty strategies do not always lead to less regret for the retailer, and the information uncertainty does not necessarily lead to greater regret for the supplier. Moreover, some schemes to reduce the bullwhip effect are proposed, such as improving the accuracy of uncertain yield, increasing shortage penalty or replenishment subsidy, and decreasing replenishment cost. It is verified that the replenishment strategies can increase profits for both the retailer and the supplier under some conditions. In extensions, we reveal the supplier’s preference for emergency production and external procurement, as well as preferences for information sharing and confidentiality. Meanwhile, we find that decentralized decision-making may even outperform centralized decision-making in some situations when the minimax-regret criterion is adopted to deal with the information deficiency. Finally, the robustness of the replenishment strategies in reducing both enterprises’ regrets is checked.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Economics","volume":"279 ","pages":"Article 109414"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527324002718","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With partial yield and demand information, we investigate a two-echelon newsvendor problem in a supply chain for innovative product, in which the retailer and the supplier make sequential decisions in ordering, production, and replenishment, respectively. We adopt the minimax-regret criterion to assume the risk-averse nature and deduce the minimax-regret inventory decisions. We explore replenishment (emergency) production strategies for the supplier. Then we propose shortage penalty strategies as well as subsidized replenishment strategies for the retailer so that the supplier can maintain the required supply even under higher replenishment production costs. We further reveal the role of information uncertainty in the minimax-regret decisions and the bullwhip effect. Interestingly, the results show that the penalty strategies do not always lead to less regret for the retailer, and the information uncertainty does not necessarily lead to greater regret for the supplier. Moreover, some schemes to reduce the bullwhip effect are proposed, such as improving the accuracy of uncertain yield, increasing shortage penalty or replenishment subsidy, and decreasing replenishment cost. It is verified that the replenishment strategies can increase profits for both the retailer and the supplier under some conditions. In extensions, we reveal the supplier’s preference for emergency production and external procurement, as well as preferences for information sharing and confidentiality. Meanwhile, we find that decentralized decision-making may even outperform centralized decision-making in some situations when the minimax-regret criterion is adopted to deal with the information deficiency. Finally, the robustness of the replenishment strategies in reducing both enterprises’ regrets is checked.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创新产品供应链中的稳健订购、生产和补货:具有产量和需求部分信息的两梯队新闻供应商问题
利用部分产量和需求信息,我们研究了创新产品供应链中的双渠道新闻供应商问题,其中零售商和供应商分别在订货、生产和补货方面做出顺序决策。我们采用最小后悔准则来假设风险规避性质,并推导出最小后悔库存决策。我们探讨了供应商的补货(紧急)生产策略。然后,我们为零售商提出了短缺惩罚策略和补贴补货策略,使供应商即使在补货生产成本较高的情况下也能维持所需供应。我们进一步揭示了信息不确定性在最小后悔决策和牛鞭效应中的作用。有趣的是,结果表明惩罚策略并不总是导致零售商减少遗憾,而信息不确定性也不一定导致供应商增加遗憾。此外,还提出了一些减少牛鞭效应的方案,如提高不确定产量的准确性、增加短缺惩罚或补货补贴、降低补货成本等。经过验证,在某些条件下,补货策略可以增加零售商和供应商的利润。在扩展方面,我们揭示了供应商对紧急生产和外部采购的偏好,以及对信息共享和保密的偏好。同时,我们发现在某些情况下,如果采用最小遗憾准则来处理信息不足问题,分散决策甚至可能优于集中决策。最后,我们检验了补货策略在减少两家企业遗憾方面的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Production Economics
International Journal of Production Economics 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
266
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Production Economics focuses on the interface between engineering and management. It covers all aspects of manufacturing and process industries, as well as production in general. The journal is interdisciplinary, considering activities throughout the product life cycle and material flow cycle. It aims to disseminate knowledge for improving industrial practice and strengthening the theoretical base for decision making. The journal serves as a forum for exchanging ideas and presenting new developments in theory and application, combining academic standards with practical value for industrial applications.
期刊最新文献
How lean and industry 4.0 affect worker outcomes and operational performance: A quantitative assessment of competing models Sustainability diffusion in the Chinese semiconductor industry: A stakeholder salience perspective Integrating collaboration scenarios and workforce individualization in collaborative assembly line balancing Optimizing floating crane operations for efficient bulk product transshipments on inland waterways Collaborative supply chain network design under demand uncertainty: A robust optimization approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1