{"title":"Potential recovery of arm strength capability in a post-breast cancer treatment population: A simulation analysis","authors":"Jacquelyn M. Maciukiewicz, Clark R. Dickerson","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Arm dysfunction often follows breast cancer treatments. Diversity in treatment makes it challenging to explore how exercise impacts dysfunction in survivors. This study computationally simulated treatment scenarios to identify a theoretical maximal producible force (aided by muscular training) and the internal muscle forces required to produce that force in a compromised system. An existing shoulder model was modified to reduce the capacity of certain muscles to mimic lower-functioning breast cancer populations. Capacity of muscles were increased to emulate training, with maximums dictated based on damage from treatment-specific scenarios (radiation, chemotherapy, combination treatment). Maximum force, torque, and muscle forces were extracted for each treatment scenario, a maximum (unaltered) non-cancer reference, and baseline (breast cancer survivor) force, across 2 maximum isometric force exertions (adduction and internal rotation). Overall, 70–80 % of strength was recoverable with successful retraining. Specifically, for both exertions’ recruitment of primary movers (adductors or internal rotators) and scapular and glenohumeral stabilizers, increased from the baseline level in each scenario, with highest recruitment at the non-cancer reference force level. Although no post-training scenario reached non-cancer reference control population force levels, achieving 70–80 % of force could enable more successful daily task performance, return to work and enhance overall physical self-efficacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 112398"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929024004767","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Arm dysfunction often follows breast cancer treatments. Diversity in treatment makes it challenging to explore how exercise impacts dysfunction in survivors. This study computationally simulated treatment scenarios to identify a theoretical maximal producible force (aided by muscular training) and the internal muscle forces required to produce that force in a compromised system. An existing shoulder model was modified to reduce the capacity of certain muscles to mimic lower-functioning breast cancer populations. Capacity of muscles were increased to emulate training, with maximums dictated based on damage from treatment-specific scenarios (radiation, chemotherapy, combination treatment). Maximum force, torque, and muscle forces were extracted for each treatment scenario, a maximum (unaltered) non-cancer reference, and baseline (breast cancer survivor) force, across 2 maximum isometric force exertions (adduction and internal rotation). Overall, 70–80 % of strength was recoverable with successful retraining. Specifically, for both exertions’ recruitment of primary movers (adductors or internal rotators) and scapular and glenohumeral stabilizers, increased from the baseline level in each scenario, with highest recruitment at the non-cancer reference force level. Although no post-training scenario reached non-cancer reference control population force levels, achieving 70–80 % of force could enable more successful daily task performance, return to work and enhance overall physical self-efficacy.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.