Adapting to policy changes: How firms' R&D responses affect their performance

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Research Policy Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2024.105143
{"title":"Adapting to policy changes: How firms' R&D responses affect their performance","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While researchers have shown considerable interest in investigating the effects of external shocks—such as financial, health, or environmental crises—on innovation, the impact of policy shocks, another critical type of external shocks, on innovation has been largely overlooked despite the rising political and policy disruptions on a global scale. To address this research gap, this study examines how firms adjust their R&amp;D investment in response to adverse policy shocks and the subsequent impact on their performance. The empirical context is an unexpected and significant subsidy reduction policy in the Chinese solar photovoltaic (PV) industry in 2018. Using a combination of propensity score matching and difference-in-differences models, we provide causal evidence of heterogeneous R&amp;D adjustments amidst negative policy changes: while many firms reduced their R&amp;D investment, some unexpectedly increased it. The policy shock, therefore, results in an overall insignificant impact on R&amp;D investments across the industry. Furthermore, we find that increasing R&amp;D investment as a reaction to policy shock is associated with an increase of 294 million renminbi (RMB) (approximately 40 million USD) in revenue or 30 million RMB (approximately 4 million USD) in profits on average. Our results suggest that R&amp;D investments demonstrate a certain degree of resilience in the face of adverse policy shocks, serving as a protective measure for firms during such policy shifts. However, given the tendency of most firms to reduce R&amp;D investments in response to adverse policy changes, these shifts may impede technological progress among less capable and resourceful firms, potentially jeopardizing their survival and contributing to a more concentrated market structure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324001926","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While researchers have shown considerable interest in investigating the effects of external shocks—such as financial, health, or environmental crises—on innovation, the impact of policy shocks, another critical type of external shocks, on innovation has been largely overlooked despite the rising political and policy disruptions on a global scale. To address this research gap, this study examines how firms adjust their R&D investment in response to adverse policy shocks and the subsequent impact on their performance. The empirical context is an unexpected and significant subsidy reduction policy in the Chinese solar photovoltaic (PV) industry in 2018. Using a combination of propensity score matching and difference-in-differences models, we provide causal evidence of heterogeneous R&D adjustments amidst negative policy changes: while many firms reduced their R&D investment, some unexpectedly increased it. The policy shock, therefore, results in an overall insignificant impact on R&D investments across the industry. Furthermore, we find that increasing R&D investment as a reaction to policy shock is associated with an increase of 294 million renminbi (RMB) (approximately 40 million USD) in revenue or 30 million RMB (approximately 4 million USD) in profits on average. Our results suggest that R&D investments demonstrate a certain degree of resilience in the face of adverse policy shocks, serving as a protective measure for firms during such policy shifts. However, given the tendency of most firms to reduce R&D investments in response to adverse policy changes, these shifts may impede technological progress among less capable and resourceful firms, potentially jeopardizing their survival and contributing to a more concentrated market structure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
适应政策变化:企业的研发对策如何影响其绩效
尽管研究人员对调查外部冲击(如金融、健康或环境危机)对创新的影响表现出了浓厚的兴趣,但政策冲击(另一种重要的外部冲击)对创新的影响却在很大程度上被忽视了,尽管全球范围内的政治和政策干扰不断增加。为了弥补这一研究空白,本研究探讨了企业如何调整其研发投资以应对不利的政策冲击,以及随后对企业绩效的影响。实证背景是 2018 年中国太阳能光伏(PV)行业出人意料地大幅降低补贴政策。我们结合使用倾向得分匹配和差分模型,提供了在负面政策变化中进行异质性研发调整的因果证据:虽然许多企业减少了研发投资,但有些企业却意外地增加了研发投资。因此,政策冲击对整个行业研发投资的总体影响并不显著。此外,我们还发现,作为对政策冲击的反应,增加研发投资平均会增加 2.94 亿人民币(约合 4000 万美元)的收入或 3000 万人民币(约合 400 万美元)的利润。我们的研究结果表明,面对不利的政策冲击,研发投资表现出了一定程度的抗冲击能力,是企业在政策转变期间的一种保护措施。然而,由于大多数企业倾向于减少研发投资以应对不利的政策变化,这些变化可能会阻碍能力和资源较弱的企业的技术进步,从而可能危及它们的生存,并导致市场结构更加集中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research Policy
Research Policy MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Research Policy (RP) articles explore the interaction between innovation, technology, or research, and economic, social, political, and organizational processes, both empirically and theoretically. All RP papers are expected to provide insights with implications for policy or management. Research Policy (RP) is a multidisciplinary journal focused on analyzing, understanding, and effectively addressing the challenges posed by innovation, technology, R&D, and science. This includes activities related to knowledge creation, diffusion, acquisition, and exploitation in the form of new or improved products, processes, or services, across economic, policy, management, organizational, and environmental dimensions.
期刊最新文献
Everyone steps back? The widespread retraction of crowd-funding support for minority creators when migration fear is high The Nobel “Pride” Phenomenon: An analysis of Nobel Prize discoveries and their recognition Adapting to policy changes: How firms' R&D responses affect their performance Family CEO and radical innovation: A stewardship perspective Culture of impact in agricultural research organisations: What for and how?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1