Commodity risk assessment of Betula pendula and Betula pubescens plants from the UK

IF 3.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY EFSA Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9051
EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH), Antonio Vicent Civera, Paula Baptista, Anna Berlin, Elisavet Chatzivassiliou, Jaime Cubero, Nik Cunniffe, Eduardo de la Peña, Nicolas Desneux, Francesco Di Serio, Anna Filipiak, Beata Hasiów-Jaroszewska, Hervé Jactel, Blanca B. Landa, Lara Maistrello, David Makowski, Panagiotis Milonas, Nikos T. Papadopulos, Roel Potting, Hanna Susi, Dirk Jan Van Der Gaag, Andrea Battisti, Hugo Mas, Daniel Rigling, Massimo Faccoli, Alžběta Mikulová, Fabio Stergulc, Eugen Christoph, Olaf Mosbach-Schulz, Franz Streissl, Paolo Gonthier
{"title":"Commodity risk assessment of Betula pendula and Betula pubescens plants from the UK","authors":"EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH),&nbsp;Antonio Vicent Civera,&nbsp;Paula Baptista,&nbsp;Anna Berlin,&nbsp;Elisavet Chatzivassiliou,&nbsp;Jaime Cubero,&nbsp;Nik Cunniffe,&nbsp;Eduardo de la Peña,&nbsp;Nicolas Desneux,&nbsp;Francesco Di Serio,&nbsp;Anna Filipiak,&nbsp;Beata Hasiów-Jaroszewska,&nbsp;Hervé Jactel,&nbsp;Blanca B. Landa,&nbsp;Lara Maistrello,&nbsp;David Makowski,&nbsp;Panagiotis Milonas,&nbsp;Nikos T. Papadopulos,&nbsp;Roel Potting,&nbsp;Hanna Susi,&nbsp;Dirk Jan Van Der Gaag,&nbsp;Andrea Battisti,&nbsp;Hugo Mas,&nbsp;Daniel Rigling,&nbsp;Massimo Faccoli,&nbsp;Alžběta Mikulová,&nbsp;Fabio Stergulc,&nbsp;Eugen Christoph,&nbsp;Olaf Mosbach-Schulz,&nbsp;Franz Streissl,&nbsp;Paolo Gonthier","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as ‘High risk plants, plant products and other objects’. This Scientific Opinion covers plant health risks posed by plants of <i>Betula pendula</i> and <i>B. pubescens</i> imported from the United Kingdom (UK) taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by the UK. The commodities were grouped in the risk assessment as (a) bundles of 10–20 graftwood/budwood (up to 1-year-old), (b) bare root plants which include bundles of 25 or 50 seedlings or transplants (1–2 years-old), bundles of 5, 10 or 15 whips (1–2 years-old) and single bare root plants (1–7 years-old), (c) plants in pots which include bundles of 5 and 10 cell-grown plants (1–2 years-old) and rooted plants in pots (1–7 years-old), and (d) large specimen trees up to 15-years-old. All pests associated with the commodities were evaluated against specific criteria for their relevance for this opinion. Two EU quarantine pests i.e. <i>Meloidogyne fallax</i> and <i>Phytophthora ramorum</i> (non-EU isolates) and two protected zone quarantine pests i.e. <i>Entoleuca mammata</i> and <i>Thaumetopoea processionea</i> fulfilled all relevant criteria and were selected for further evaluation. For the selected pests, the risk mitigation measures described in the technical dossier from the UK were evaluated considering the possible limiting factors. For these pests an expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom taking into consideration the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including uncertainties associated with the assessment. In the assessment of risk, the age of the plants was considered, as larger trees are more likely to be infested mainly due to longer time grown in the field. In addition, larger canopies and root systems are more difficult to inspect, thereby making the detection of pests more challenging on large trees. The likelihood of pest freedom varies among the pests evaluated, with <i>M. fallax</i> being the pest most frequently expected on the imported plants. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation (EKE) indicated with 95% certainty that between 9735 and 10,000 per 10,000 large specimen trees will be free from <i>M. fallax</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9051","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as ‘High risk plants, plant products and other objects’. This Scientific Opinion covers plant health risks posed by plants of Betula pendula and B. pubescens imported from the United Kingdom (UK) taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by the UK. The commodities were grouped in the risk assessment as (a) bundles of 10–20 graftwood/budwood (up to 1-year-old), (b) bare root plants which include bundles of 25 or 50 seedlings or transplants (1–2 years-old), bundles of 5, 10 or 15 whips (1–2 years-old) and single bare root plants (1–7 years-old), (c) plants in pots which include bundles of 5 and 10 cell-grown plants (1–2 years-old) and rooted plants in pots (1–7 years-old), and (d) large specimen trees up to 15-years-old. All pests associated with the commodities were evaluated against specific criteria for their relevance for this opinion. Two EU quarantine pests i.e. Meloidogyne fallax and Phytophthora ramorum (non-EU isolates) and two protected zone quarantine pests i.e. Entoleuca mammata and Thaumetopoea processionea fulfilled all relevant criteria and were selected for further evaluation. For the selected pests, the risk mitigation measures described in the technical dossier from the UK were evaluated considering the possible limiting factors. For these pests an expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom taking into consideration the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including uncertainties associated with the assessment. In the assessment of risk, the age of the plants was considered, as larger trees are more likely to be infested mainly due to longer time grown in the field. In addition, larger canopies and root systems are more difficult to inspect, thereby making the detection of pests more challenging on large trees. The likelihood of pest freedom varies among the pests evaluated, with M. fallax being the pest most frequently expected on the imported plants. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation (EKE) indicated with 95% certainty that between 9735 and 10,000 per 10,000 large specimen trees will be free from M. fallax.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国桦属植物的商品风险评估
欧盟委员会要求欧洲食物安全局植物健康专家小组准备并提供对委员会2018/2019年实施条例(欧盟)中所列 "高风险植物、植物产品和其他物品 "商品的风险评估。本科学意见涉及从英国(UK)进口的悬铃木(Betula pendula)和短叶悬铃木(B. pubescens)植物带来的植物健康风险,其中考虑到了现有的科学信息,包括英国提供的技术信息。在风险评估中,这些商品被归类为:(a)每捆 10 至 20 株嫁接木/芽材(树龄不超过 1 年);(b)裸根植物,包括每捆 25 或 50 株幼苗或移栽植物(树龄 1 至 2 年);每捆 5、(c) 盆栽植物,包括 5 株和 10 株细胞生长植物(1-2 年)和盆栽生根植物(1-7 年),以及 (d) 树龄不超过 15 年的大型标本树。与商品相关的所有害虫都根据具体标准进行了评估,以确定其与本意见的相关性。两种欧盟检疫害虫,即 Meloidogyne fallax 和 Phytophthora ramorum(非欧盟分离物),以及两种保护区检疫害虫,即 Entoleuca mammata 和 Thaumetopoea processionea,符合所有相关标准,并被选中进行进一步评估。对于所选害虫,考虑到可能的限制因素,对英国技术卷宗中描述的风险缓解措施进行了评估。对于这些害虫,专家在考虑到针对害虫的风险缓解措施(包括与评估相关的不确定性)的情况下,对害虫自由的可能性做出了判断。在风险评估中,考虑了植物的树龄,因为较大的树木更有可能受到虫害,这主要是因为在田间生长的时间较长。此外,较大的树冠和根系更难检查,因此在大树上检测害虫更具挑战性。不同害虫发生虫害的可能性各不相同,其中落叶金龟子是进口植物上最常见的害虫。专家知识诱导(EKE)显示,95% 的确定性表明,每 10,000 棵大型标本树中有 9735 棵至 10,000 棵不会出现金龟子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EFSA Journal
EFSA Journal Veterinary-Veterinary (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
21.20%
发文量
422
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.
期刊最新文献
Guidance for establishing and applying tolerable upper intake levels for vitamins and essential minerals Scientific opinion on the extension of the authorisation of use of the food additive steviol glycosides (E 960a–d) and the modification of the acceptable daily intake (ADI) for steviol Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fludioxonil Commodity risk assessment of Betula pendula and Betula pubescens plants from the UK Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of tartrazine for its use in baits for freshwater fish (GIFAP)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1