Selina A. Roman-White, Deeksha Mallikarjuna Prasanna, Amber McCullagh, Arvind P. Ravikumar, David Thomas Allen, Kavya Chivukula, Harshvardhan Khutal, Paul Balcombe, Gregory Ross, Brad Handler, Morgan Bazilian, Fiji C. George
{"title":"Gas Pathing: Improved Greenhouse Gas Emission Estimates of Liquefied Natural Gas Exports through Enhanced Supply Chain Resolution","authors":"Selina A. Roman-White, Deeksha Mallikarjuna Prasanna, Amber McCullagh, Arvind P. Ravikumar, David Thomas Allen, Kavya Chivukula, Harshvardhan Khutal, Paul Balcombe, Gregory Ross, Brad Handler, Morgan Bazilian, Fiji C. George","doi":"10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c07162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The utilization of greenhouse gas (GHG) life cycle assessments (LCAs) of liquefied natural gas (LNG) has increased over the past decade. In this study, a novel framework for improved supply chain-specific LCAs for GHGs is presented using a gas pathing algorithm aligned with how gas is purchased, sold, and transported within the U.S. Utilizing supply chain emissions and gas purchase data specific to two U.S. liquefaction facilities, we identify 138 distinct gas pathways with GHG emission profiles that can vary by nearly a factor of 6. Reference case GHG intensities are 22–53% lower than prior studies for U.S. LNG delivered to Europe (production through regasification, 100-yr GWP). This study also incorporates recent supply chain measurement data. GHG intensities based on measurement data for U.S. LNG delivered to Europe are 41–52% higher than the reference case (production through regasification 100-yr GWP) and 8–11% higher for production through power generation boundaries (all market destinations, 100-yr GWP) but 20–28% lower than prior estimates employing national or regional nonempirical data. Supply chain-specific LCAs and the integration of emission measurements in LCAs are critical to accurately characterize the differences in GHG emissions from natural gas and LNG supply chains.","PeriodicalId":25,"journal":{"name":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c07162","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The utilization of greenhouse gas (GHG) life cycle assessments (LCAs) of liquefied natural gas (LNG) has increased over the past decade. In this study, a novel framework for improved supply chain-specific LCAs for GHGs is presented using a gas pathing algorithm aligned with how gas is purchased, sold, and transported within the U.S. Utilizing supply chain emissions and gas purchase data specific to two U.S. liquefaction facilities, we identify 138 distinct gas pathways with GHG emission profiles that can vary by nearly a factor of 6. Reference case GHG intensities are 22–53% lower than prior studies for U.S. LNG delivered to Europe (production through regasification, 100-yr GWP). This study also incorporates recent supply chain measurement data. GHG intensities based on measurement data for U.S. LNG delivered to Europe are 41–52% higher than the reference case (production through regasification 100-yr GWP) and 8–11% higher for production through power generation boundaries (all market destinations, 100-yr GWP) but 20–28% lower than prior estimates employing national or regional nonempirical data. Supply chain-specific LCAs and the integration of emission measurements in LCAs are critical to accurately characterize the differences in GHG emissions from natural gas and LNG supply chains.
期刊介绍:
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering is a prestigious weekly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the American Chemical Society. Dedicated to advancing the principles of green chemistry and green engineering, it covers a wide array of research topics including green chemistry, green engineering, biomass, alternative energy, and life cycle assessment.
The journal welcomes submissions in various formats, including Letters, Articles, Features, and Perspectives (Reviews), that address the challenges of sustainability in the chemical enterprise and contribute to the advancement of sustainable practices. Join us in shaping the future of sustainable chemistry and engineering.