Editorial: Understanding Factors Associated With Abdominal Pain in Ulcerative Colitis—No Surprises but the Usual Suspects Need Greater Attention. Authors' Reply

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1111/apt.18380
Tom van Gils, Hans Törnblom, Jóhann P. Hreinsson, Börje Jonefjäll, Hans Strid, Magnus Simrén
{"title":"Editorial: Understanding Factors Associated With Abdominal Pain in Ulcerative Colitis—No Surprises but the Usual Suspects Need Greater Attention. Authors' Reply","authors":"Tom van Gils,&nbsp;Hans Törnblom,&nbsp;Jóhann P. Hreinsson,&nbsp;Börje Jonefjäll,&nbsp;Hans Strid,&nbsp;Magnus Simrén","doi":"10.1111/apt.18380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We thank Dr. Gao and Professor Segal for their interest in our paper on abdominal pain and associated factors in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) [<span>1, 2</span>]. We agree with them regarding the importance of being aware of abdominal pain in patients with UC, including factors associated with gut-brain interaction, in particular anxiety and depression. Additionally, we agree with the suggestion that predictive factors for abdominal pain in UC need to be studied more. Despite these agreements, we would like to clarify why we think that the abdominal pain question of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) [<span>3, 4</span>] has an advantage compared to most other questionnaires assessing abdominal pain, despite the fact that the GSRS has a focus on upper rather than lower abdominal pain and discomfort, as we discussed [<span>1</span>].</p><p>Importantly, it is difficult to measure the different aspects of chronic abdominal pain that can influence how it is perceived due to interacting peripheral and central mechanisms [<span>5</span>]. The authors of an international guideline on chronic pancreatitis, a disease in which abdominal pain is the most common symptom, stated that the one-dimensional pain intensity ratings alone are insufficient to evaluate chronic abdominal pain [<span>6</span>]. Instead, they suggested using a multidimensional approach including, among others, physical functioning, in combination with abdominal pain intensity scales. With this in mind, we think that rating the bothersomeness of abdominal pain or discomfort, as done in the GSRS, is a more comprehensive approach to assess the multidimensionality of abdominal pain compared to assessing only the severity (i.e. intensity) of the pain, as in most questionnaires including the Ulcerative Colitis Patient-Reported Outcomes Signs and Symptoms [<span>7</span>] referred to by Drs. Gao and Segal.</p><p>Future studies are required to investigate gut-brain interaction targeting medical, dietary and psychological therapies in the subgroup of patients with UC and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)-like symptoms. This is based on the evidence for the role of gut–brain interaction in those with persisting abdominal pain and (quiescent) UC, the impact of IBS-like symptoms, including abdominal pain, on quality of life and the lack of trials investigating treatment strategies targeting gut–brain interaction in patients with UC [<span>1, 8, 9</span>].</p><p><b>Tom van Gils:</b> writing – original draft. <b>Hans Törnblom:</b> writing – review and editing. <b>Jóhann P. Hreinsson:</b> writing – review and editing. <b>Börje Jonefjäll:</b> writing – review and editing. <b>Hans Strid:</b> writing – review and editing. <b>Magnus Simrén:</b> writing – review and editing.</p><p>This article is linked to Van Gils et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18344 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18353.</p>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"61 2","pages":"373-374"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apt.18380","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.18380","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We thank Dr. Gao and Professor Segal for their interest in our paper on abdominal pain and associated factors in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) [1, 2]. We agree with them regarding the importance of being aware of abdominal pain in patients with UC, including factors associated with gut-brain interaction, in particular anxiety and depression. Additionally, we agree with the suggestion that predictive factors for abdominal pain in UC need to be studied more. Despite these agreements, we would like to clarify why we think that the abdominal pain question of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) [3, 4] has an advantage compared to most other questionnaires assessing abdominal pain, despite the fact that the GSRS has a focus on upper rather than lower abdominal pain and discomfort, as we discussed [1].

Importantly, it is difficult to measure the different aspects of chronic abdominal pain that can influence how it is perceived due to interacting peripheral and central mechanisms [5]. The authors of an international guideline on chronic pancreatitis, a disease in which abdominal pain is the most common symptom, stated that the one-dimensional pain intensity ratings alone are insufficient to evaluate chronic abdominal pain [6]. Instead, they suggested using a multidimensional approach including, among others, physical functioning, in combination with abdominal pain intensity scales. With this in mind, we think that rating the bothersomeness of abdominal pain or discomfort, as done in the GSRS, is a more comprehensive approach to assess the multidimensionality of abdominal pain compared to assessing only the severity (i.e. intensity) of the pain, as in most questionnaires including the Ulcerative Colitis Patient-Reported Outcomes Signs and Symptoms [7] referred to by Drs. Gao and Segal.

Future studies are required to investigate gut-brain interaction targeting medical, dietary and psychological therapies in the subgroup of patients with UC and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)-like symptoms. This is based on the evidence for the role of gut–brain interaction in those with persisting abdominal pain and (quiescent) UC, the impact of IBS-like symptoms, including abdominal pain, on quality of life and the lack of trials investigating treatment strategies targeting gut–brain interaction in patients with UC [1, 8, 9].

Tom van Gils: writing – original draft. Hans Törnblom: writing – review and editing. Jóhann P. Hreinsson: writing – review and editing. Börje Jonefjäll: writing – review and editing. Hans Strid: writing – review and editing. Magnus Simrén: writing – review and editing.

This article is linked to Van Gils et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18344 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18353.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社论:了解溃疡性结肠炎腹痛的相关因素--没有惊喜,但通常的疑点需要更多关注。作者回复。
我们感谢高博士和西格尔教授对我们关于溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者腹痛及相关因素的论文的兴趣[1,2]。我们同意他们关于了解UC患者腹痛的重要性,包括与肠脑相互作用相关的因素,特别是焦虑和抑郁。此外,我们同意UC腹痛的预测因素需要更多的研究。尽管有这些共识,但我们想澄清为什么我们认为胃肠道症状评定量表(GSRS)的腹痛问题[3,4]与大多数其他评估腹痛的问卷相比具有优势,尽管GSRS关注的是上腹部疼痛而不是下腹部疼痛和不适,正如我们讨论的那样[1]。重要的是,由于外周和中枢机制的相互作用,很难测量慢性腹痛的不同方面,这些方面会影响人们对疼痛的感知。慢性胰腺炎是一种以腹痛为最常见症状的疾病,其国际指南的作者指出,单凭一维疼痛强度分级不足以评估慢性腹痛。相反,他们建议使用多维度的方法,包括身体功能,以及腹痛强度量表。考虑到这一点,我们认为,与仅评估疼痛的严重程度(即强度)相比,在GSRS中对腹痛或不适的困扰程度进行评级是一种更全面的评估腹痛多维度的方法,如在大多数问卷中,包括溃疡性结肠炎患者报告的结果、体征和症状[7]。高和西格尔。未来的研究需要针对UC和肠易激综合征(IBS)样症状患者亚组的医疗、饮食和心理治疗来调查肠-脑相互作用。这是基于肠-脑相互作用在持续性腹痛和(静止性)UC患者中的作用的证据,ibs样症状(包括腹痛)对生活质量的影响以及缺乏针对UC患者肠-脑相互作用治疗策略的试验[1,8,9]。汤姆·范·吉尔斯:写作——原稿。Hans Törnblom:写作-审查和编辑。Jóhann P. Hreinsson:写作-审查和编辑。Börje Jonefjäll:写作-审查和编辑。汉斯·斯特里德:写作-评论和编辑。马格努斯·西姆拉西姆:写作-审查和编辑。这篇文章链接到Van Gils等人的论文。要查看这些文章,请访问https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18344和https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18353。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
7.90%
发文量
527
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.
期刊最新文献
Letter: Attempted Validation of Villin-1 as a Gut Barrier Marker in Decompensated Cirrhosis-Potential Confounding by Tubular Injury and Aetiology. Authors' Reply. Letter: Optimising Hepatitis B Vaccination in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Expanding Strategies Beyond Double-Dose Recombinant Vaccination. Authors' Reply. Editorial-Fistula Calprotectin as a Biomarker of Local Inflammation and Treatment Response in Perianal Fistulising Crohn's Disease. Authors' Reply. Editorial: Beyond Resection-Rethinking Postoperative Management in Colonic Crohn's Disease. Editorial: New Insights Into the Aetiopathogenesis of Post-Infective Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Functional Dyspepsia: A Significant Step Forward but What Next? Authors' Reply
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1