The evolutionary dynamics of genome sizes and repetitive elements in Ensifera (Insecta: Orthoptera).

IF 3.5 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY BMC Genomics Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1186/s12864-024-10949-0
Hao Yuan, Xiao-Jing Liu, Xuan-Zeng Liu, Li-Na Zhao, Shao-Li Mao, Yuan Huang
{"title":"The evolutionary dynamics of genome sizes and repetitive elements in Ensifera (Insecta: Orthoptera).","authors":"Hao Yuan, Xiao-Jing Liu, Xuan-Zeng Liu, Li-Na Zhao, Shao-Li Mao, Yuan Huang","doi":"10.1186/s12864-024-10949-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In evolutionary biology, identifying and quantifying inter-lineage genome size variation and elucidating the underlying causes of that variation have long been goals. Repetitive elements (REs) have been proposed and confirmed as being among the most important contributors to genome size variation. However, the evolutionary implications of genome size variation and RE dynamics are not well understood.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 35 Ensifera insects were collected from different areas in China, including nine species of crickets and 26 species of katydids. The genome sizes of seven species were then determined using flow cytometry. The RepeatExplorer2 pipeline was employed to retrieve the repeated sequences for each species, based on low-coverage (0.1 X) high-throughput Illumina unassembled short reads. The genome sizes of the 35 Ensifera insects exhibited a considerable degree of variation, ranging from 1.00 to 18.34 pg. This variation was more than 18-fold. Similarly, the RE abundances exhibited considerable variation, ranging from 13.66 to 61.16%. In addition, the Tettigonioidea had larger genomes and contained significantly more REs than did the Grylloidea genomes. Analysis of the correlation between RE abundance and the genome size of 35 Ensifera insects revealed that the abundance of REs, transposable elements (TEs), long terminal repeats (LTRs), and long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs) are significantly correlated with genome size. Notably, there is an inflection point in this correlation, where species with increasingly large genomes (e.g., > 5-10 pg) have repeats that contribute less to genome expansion than expected. Furthermore, this study revealed contrasting evolutionary directions between the Tettigonioidea and Grylloidea clades in terms of the expansion of REs. Tettigonioidea species exhibit a gradual increase in ancestral genome size and RE abundance as they diverge, while Grylloidea species experience sustained genome contraction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reveals extensive variation in genome size and RE abundance in Ensifera insects, with distinct evolutionary patterns across two major groups, Tettigonioidea and Grylloidea. This provides valuable insights into the variation in genome size and RE abundance in Ensifera insects, offering a comprehensive understanding of their evolutionary history.</p>","PeriodicalId":9030,"journal":{"name":"BMC Genomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10949-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In evolutionary biology, identifying and quantifying inter-lineage genome size variation and elucidating the underlying causes of that variation have long been goals. Repetitive elements (REs) have been proposed and confirmed as being among the most important contributors to genome size variation. However, the evolutionary implications of genome size variation and RE dynamics are not well understood.

Results: A total of 35 Ensifera insects were collected from different areas in China, including nine species of crickets and 26 species of katydids. The genome sizes of seven species were then determined using flow cytometry. The RepeatExplorer2 pipeline was employed to retrieve the repeated sequences for each species, based on low-coverage (0.1 X) high-throughput Illumina unassembled short reads. The genome sizes of the 35 Ensifera insects exhibited a considerable degree of variation, ranging from 1.00 to 18.34 pg. This variation was more than 18-fold. Similarly, the RE abundances exhibited considerable variation, ranging from 13.66 to 61.16%. In addition, the Tettigonioidea had larger genomes and contained significantly more REs than did the Grylloidea genomes. Analysis of the correlation between RE abundance and the genome size of 35 Ensifera insects revealed that the abundance of REs, transposable elements (TEs), long terminal repeats (LTRs), and long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs) are significantly correlated with genome size. Notably, there is an inflection point in this correlation, where species with increasingly large genomes (e.g., > 5-10 pg) have repeats that contribute less to genome expansion than expected. Furthermore, this study revealed contrasting evolutionary directions between the Tettigonioidea and Grylloidea clades in terms of the expansion of REs. Tettigonioidea species exhibit a gradual increase in ancestral genome size and RE abundance as they diverge, while Grylloidea species experience sustained genome contraction.

Conclusions: This study reveals extensive variation in genome size and RE abundance in Ensifera insects, with distinct evolutionary patterns across two major groups, Tettigonioidea and Grylloidea. This provides valuable insights into the variation in genome size and RE abundance in Ensifera insects, offering a comprehensive understanding of their evolutionary history.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ensifera(昆虫纲:直翅目)基因组大小和重复元件的进化动态。
背景:在进化生物学中,识别和量化世系间基因组大小变异并阐明这种变异的根本原因是长期以来的目标。重复元件(REs)已被提出并证实是造成基因组大小变异的最重要因素之一。然而,人们对基因组大小变异和RE动态对进化的影响还不甚了解:结果:从中国不同地区共采集了35种Ensifera昆虫,包括9种蟋蟀和26种蝈蝈。然后利用流式细胞仪测定了 7 个物种的基因组大小。基于低覆盖率(0.1 X)的高通量 Illumina 未组装短读数,使用 RepeatExplorer2 管道检索每个物种的重复序列。35 种 Ensifera 昆虫的基因组大小差异很大,从 1.00 pg 到 18.34 pg 不等。同样,RE 丰度也表现出相当大的差异,从 13.66% 到 61.16% 不等。此外,Tettigonioidea 的基因组较大,含有的 RE 明显多于 Grylloidea 的基因组。对 35 种 Ensifera 昆虫的 RE 丰度与基因组大小的相关性分析表明,RE、转座元件(TE)、长末端重复序列(LTR)和长穿插核元件(LINE)的丰度与基因组大小显著相关。值得注意的是,这种相关性存在一个拐点,即基因组越来越大(如大于 5-10 pg)的物种,其重复序列对基因组扩展的贡献比预期的要小。此外,这项研究还揭示了Tettigonioidea和Grylloidea支系在REs扩展方面截然不同的进化方向。Tettigonioidea物种在分化过程中表现出祖先基因组大小和RE丰度的逐渐增加,而Grylloidea物种则经历了持续的基因组收缩:这项研究揭示了Ensifera昆虫基因组大小和RE丰度的广泛变异,其中Tettigonioidea和Grylloidea两大类的进化模式截然不同。这为我们深入了解Ensifera昆虫基因组大小和RE丰度的变化提供了宝贵的资料,有助于全面了解它们的进化历史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Genomics
BMC Genomics 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
769
审稿时长
6.4 months
期刊介绍: BMC Genomics is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of genome-scale analysis, functional genomics, and proteomics. BMC Genomics is part of the BMC series which publishes subject-specific journals focused on the needs of individual research communities across all areas of biology and medicine. We offer an efficient, fair and friendly peer review service, and are committed to publishing all sound science, provided that there is some advance in knowledge presented by the work.
期刊最新文献
Transcriptome analysis identifies the NR4A subfamily involved in the alleviating effect of folic acid on mastitis induced by high concentration of Staphylococcus aureus lipoteichoic acid. A comprehensive analysis of the defense responses of Odontotermes formosanus (Shiraki) provides insights into the changes during Serratia marcescens infection. An INDEL genomic approach to explore population diversity of phytoplankton. Epigenetic dynamics of partially methylated domains in human placenta and trophoblast stem cells. Genetic diversity assessment of cucumber landraces using molecular signatures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1