Teratogenic Risk Impact and Mitigation (TRIM): Study Protocol for the Development of a Decision Support Tool to Prioritize Medications for Risk Mitigation.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Drug Safety Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1007/s40264-024-01488-4
Almut G Winterstein, Celeste L Y Ewig, Yanning Wang, Nicole E Smolinski, Gita A Toyserkani, Cynthia LaCivita, Leila Lackey, Sara Eggers, Esther H Zhou, Vakaramoko Diaby, Amir Sarayani, Thuy Thai, Judith C Maro, Sonja A Rasmussen
{"title":"Teratogenic Risk Impact and Mitigation (TRIM): Study Protocol for the Development of a Decision Support Tool to Prioritize Medications for Risk Mitigation.","authors":"Almut G Winterstein, Celeste L Y Ewig, Yanning Wang, Nicole E Smolinski, Gita A Toyserkani, Cynthia LaCivita, Leila Lackey, Sara Eggers, Esther H Zhou, Vakaramoko Diaby, Amir Sarayani, Thuy Thai, Judith C Maro, Sonja A Rasmussen","doi":"10.1007/s40264-024-01488-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Preventing prenatal exposure to teratogenic medications is an important goal of regulatory risk mitigation efforts. In the USA, as of March 2024, 11 teratogenic medications have a required Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program. It is unclear whether these programs target those medications with the most significant impact on public health and adverse pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to develop an innovative decision support tool that uses explicit, quantifiable criteria to facilitate prioritization of teratogenic medications for risk mitigation strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Teratogenic Risk Impact and Mitigation (TRIM) decision support tool will be developed by a national panel via a modified Delphi approach to define measurable criteria, and a multi-criteria decision analysis to estimate criteria weights within a discrete choice experiment. The TRIM scores will then be calculated for 12 teratogenic drugs with active or eliminated REMS programs and for 12 teratogenic drugs without REMS. These drugs will be identified based on highest prenatal exposure prevalence in claims data of privately and publicly insured individuals. Data for the TRIM criteria levels for these 24 drugs will be identified from evidence searches and ad hoc analyses of the same claims data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Teratogenic Risk Impact and Mitigation is intended to inform regulatory decision making about the need for risk mitigation programs for teratogenic medications by providing explicit, quantifiable, evidence-based criteria. The TRIM scores of 24 teratogenic drugs may provide benchmarks for considering REMS for marketed and new teratogenic medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":11382,"journal":{"name":"Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-024-01488-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Preventing prenatal exposure to teratogenic medications is an important goal of regulatory risk mitigation efforts. In the USA, as of March 2024, 11 teratogenic medications have a required Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program. It is unclear whether these programs target those medications with the most significant impact on public health and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Objectives: This study aims to develop an innovative decision support tool that uses explicit, quantifiable criteria to facilitate prioritization of teratogenic medications for risk mitigation strategies.

Methods: The Teratogenic Risk Impact and Mitigation (TRIM) decision support tool will be developed by a national panel via a modified Delphi approach to define measurable criteria, and a multi-criteria decision analysis to estimate criteria weights within a discrete choice experiment. The TRIM scores will then be calculated for 12 teratogenic drugs with active or eliminated REMS programs and for 12 teratogenic drugs without REMS. These drugs will be identified based on highest prenatal exposure prevalence in claims data of privately and publicly insured individuals. Data for the TRIM criteria levels for these 24 drugs will be identified from evidence searches and ad hoc analyses of the same claims data.

Conclusions: Teratogenic Risk Impact and Mitigation is intended to inform regulatory decision making about the need for risk mitigation programs for teratogenic medications by providing explicit, quantifiable, evidence-based criteria. The TRIM scores of 24 teratogenic drugs may provide benchmarks for considering REMS for marketed and new teratogenic medications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
畸胎风险影响与缓解(TRIM):开发决策支持工具以确定药物风险缓解优先次序的研究方案》(Study Protocol for the Development of a Decision Support Tool to Prioritize Medications for Risk Mitigation)。
导言:预防产前接触致畸药物是监管部门降低风险工作的一个重要目标。在美国,截至 2024 年 3 月,有 11 种致畸药物必须实施风险评估与缓解策略 (REMS) 计划。目前尚不清楚这些计划是否针对那些对公众健康和不良妊娠结局影响最大的药物:本研究旨在开发一种创新的决策支持工具,该工具采用明确的、可量化的标准来帮助确定致畸药物在风险缓解策略中的优先次序:方法:致畸风险影响与缓解(TRIM)决策支持工具将由一个国家小组开发,该小组将通过改良的德尔菲法(Delphi approach)来定义可衡量的标准,并通过多标准决策分析法(Multi-criteria decision analysis)在离散选择实验中估算标准权重。然后,将为 12 种已实施或取消 REMS 计划的致畸药物和 12 种未实施 REMS 的致畸药物计算 TRIM 分数。这些药物将根据私人和公共投保人理赔数据中最高的产前暴露率来确定。这 24 种药物的 TRIM 标准水平数据将通过证据搜索和对相同索赔数据的特别分析来确定:结论:《致畸风险影响与缓解》旨在通过提供明确的、可量化的、基于证据的标准,为监管部门制定致畸药物风险缓解方案提供决策依据。24 种致畸药物的 TRIM 评分可为考虑已上市和新的致畸药物的 REMS 提供基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Safety
Drug Safety 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Safety is the official journal of the International Society of Pharmacovigilance. The journal includes: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues. Comprehensive narrative reviews that provide an authoritative source of information on epidemiology, clinical features, prevention and management of adverse effects of individual drugs and drug classes. In-depth benefit-risk assessment of adverse effect and efficacy data for a drug in a defined therapeutic area. Systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. Original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies in disciplines such as pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilance, pharmacology and toxicology, and pharmacogenomics. Editorials and commentaries on topical issues. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Drug Safety Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
期刊最新文献
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Long-Term Safety Analysis of the BBV152 Coronavirus Vaccine in Adolescents and Adults: Findings from a 1-Year Prospective Study in North India. A Calculated Risk: Evaluation of QTc Drug-Drug Interaction (DDI) Clinical Decision Support (CDS) Alerts and Performance of the Tisdale Risk Score Calculator. Description and Validation of a Novel AI Tool, LabelComp, for the Identification of Adverse Event Changes in FDA Labeling. Examining the Effect of Missing Data and Unmeasured Confounding on External Comparator Studies: Case Studies and Simulations. Unveiling the Burden of Drug-Induced Impulsivity: A Network Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1