Pancreatic surgery after preoperative biliary drainage in periampullary cancers: does timing matter? A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Hpb Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.001
Mohamed Maatouk , Ghassen H. Kbir , Anis Ben Dhaou , Mariem Nouira , Atef Chamekh , Sami daldoul , Sofien Sayari , Mounir Ben Moussa
{"title":"Pancreatic surgery after preoperative biliary drainage in periampullary cancers: does timing matter? A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Mohamed Maatouk ,&nbsp;Ghassen H. Kbir ,&nbsp;Anis Ben Dhaou ,&nbsp;Mariem Nouira ,&nbsp;Atef Chamekh ,&nbsp;Sami daldoul ,&nbsp;Sofien Sayari ,&nbsp;Mounir Ben Moussa","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) has been introduced to control the negative effects of obstructive jaundice in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The optimal time interval between PBD and PD remains unclear. The purpose of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the optimal period for PBD before PD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Studies were searched in PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library until 30 March 2024. Studies using PBD in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice that compared the short duration group (SDG) with prolonged duration group (PDG) were included in this study. The definitions of short and prolonged drainage were based on cut-off times reported in the included studies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twelve studies were included. Based on the available data, short and prolonged drainage periods were defined by comparing the outcomes of surgeries performed within specific cut-off times of 2 weeks, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks after PBD. No significant differences were observed between the SDG and PDG in mortality, major morbidity, pancreatic fistula, post pancreatectomy haemorrhage, septic complications, operative time, and hospital stay, regardless of the delay of surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>When PBD is needed, pancreatic resection could be performed at the earliest possible stage after achieving optimal perioperative care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":"27 1","pages":"Pages 10-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hpb","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365182X2402330X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) has been introduced to control the negative effects of obstructive jaundice in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The optimal time interval between PBD and PD remains unclear. The purpose of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the optimal period for PBD before PD.

Methods

Studies were searched in PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library until 30 March 2024. Studies using PBD in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice that compared the short duration group (SDG) with prolonged duration group (PDG) were included in this study. The definitions of short and prolonged drainage were based on cut-off times reported in the included studies.

Results

Twelve studies were included. Based on the available data, short and prolonged drainage periods were defined by comparing the outcomes of surgeries performed within specific cut-off times of 2 weeks, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks after PBD. No significant differences were observed between the SDG and PDG in mortality, major morbidity, pancreatic fistula, post pancreatectomy haemorrhage, septic complications, operative time, and hospital stay, regardless of the delay of surgery.

Conclusion

When PBD is needed, pancreatic resection could be performed at the earliest possible stage after achieving optimal perioperative care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胰周癌患者术前胆道引流后进行胰腺手术:时机是否重要?系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:术前胆道引流术(PBD)是为了控制胰十二指肠切除术(PD)患者阻塞性黄疸的负面影响。PBD 和 PD 之间的最佳时间间隔仍不明确。我们的系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估胰十二指肠切除术前进行胰十二指肠切除术的最佳时间间隔:在 PubMed、Science Direct、Google Scholar 和 Cochrane Library 中检索了截至 2024 年 3 月 30 日的研究。本研究纳入了在恶性阻塞性黄疸患者中使用 PBD 的研究,这些研究对短时间组(SDG)和长时间组(PDG)进行了比较。短时间引流和长时间引流的定义基于纳入研究中报告的截止时间:结果:共纳入 12 项研究。根据现有数据,通过比较在 PBD 后 2 周、3 周和 4 周的特定截断时间内进行手术的结果来定义引流时间短和引流时间长。在死亡率、主要发病率、胰瘘、胰腺切除术后出血、化脓性并发症、手术时间和住院时间方面,SDG 和 PDG 之间没有观察到明显差异,无论手术延迟与否:结论:当需要进行胰十二指肠切除术时,可在实现最佳围手术期护理后尽早进行胰腺切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hpb
Hpb GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
244
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: HPB is an international forum for clinical, scientific and educational communication. Twelve issues a year bring the reader leading articles, expert reviews, original articles, images, editorials, and reader correspondence encompassing all aspects of benign and malignant hepatobiliary disease and its management. HPB features relevant aspects of clinical and translational research and practice. Specific areas of interest include HPB diseases encountered globally by clinical practitioners in this specialist field of gastrointestinal surgery. The journal addresses the challenges faced in the management of cancer involving the liver, biliary system and pancreas. While surgical oncology represents a large part of HPB practice, submission of manuscripts relating to liver and pancreas transplantation, the treatment of benign conditions such as acute and chronic pancreatitis, and those relating to hepatobiliary infection and inflammation are also welcomed. There will be a focus on developing a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment with endoscopic and laparoscopic approaches, radiological interventions and surgical techniques being strongly represented. HPB welcomes submission of manuscripts in all these areas and in scientific focused research that has clear clinical relevance to HPB surgical practice. HPB aims to help its readers - surgeons, physicians, radiologists and basic scientists - to develop their knowledge and practice. HPB will be of interest to specialists involved in the management of hepatobiliary and pancreatic disease however will also inform those working in related fields. Abstracted and Indexed in: MEDLINE® EMBASE PubMed Science Citation Index Expanded Academic Search (EBSCO) HPB is owned by the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) and is also the official Journal of the American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (AHPBA), the Asian-Pacific Hepato Pancreatic Biliary Association (A-PHPBA) and the European-African Hepato-Pancreatic Biliary Association (E-AHPBA).
期刊最新文献
Conference Calendar Contents Percutaneous hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidines in treatment-resistant colorectal cancer patients with unresectable liver metastases: a retrospective cohort study ChatGPT vs. surgeons on pancreatic cancer queries: accuracy & empathy evaluated by patients and experts Utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for genetic analysis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1