Pub Date : 2026-01-23DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.009
Cecilia Maina, Victor Lopez-Lopez, Domenico Santangelo, Beatrice Radaelli, José I Tudela, Alvaro Navarro-Barrios, Roberto Brusadin, Guilliermo Carbonell, Simone Gusmini, Luigi Augello, Francesco De Cobelli, Ricardo Robles-Campos, Francesca Ratti
Background: hypertrophy techniques expanded surgical indications, but some patients still experience limited clinical benefit. We aimed to identify futility predictive factors in major hepatectomies after liver venous deprivation (LVD) or ALPPS-variants (tourniquet-ALPPS or hybrid-ALPPS).
Methods: a bi-institutional cohort study conducted between 01/2015 and 07/2024 including major hepatectomies for oncologic disease following one of the three augmentation strategies.
Exclusion criteria: age <18, benign pathology, follow-up < 6-months, and interstage dropout. Futility corresponded to 90-days mortality or very early recurrence (≤6 months). Predictors of futile outcomes were identified by uni- and multi-variate analyses and utilized to build a futility score (0-10).
Results: 84 patients completed the surgical process (dropout rate: 21.1 %): 40.5 % underwent LVD, 33.3 % tourniquet-ALPPS, and 26.2 % hybrid-ALPPS. Futility was observed in 35 patients (41.7 %) and logistic regression identified baseline sFLR (OR 0.89, p = 0.013), associated procedures (OR 3.07, p = 0.046), right trisectionectomy (OR 5.61, p = 0.031), and non-radical resection (OR 4.31, p = 0.01) as independent predictors. A futility score ≥4 (n = 36) predicted a futile outcome with good discrimination (AUC 0.802; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Technical success after hypertrophy techniques not always equates clinical benefit. Recognizing predictors of futility may improve patient selection and guide more personalized therapeutic strategies.
背景:肥厚技术扩大了手术指征,但一些患者的临床获益仍然有限。我们的目的是确定肝静脉剥夺(LVD)或alpps变体(止血带- alpps或混合alpps)后主要肝切除术的无效预测因素。方法:在2015年1月至2024年7月期间进行的一项双机构队列研究,包括在三种增强策略之一后进行肿瘤疾病大肝切除术。结果:84例患者完成了手术(辍学率:21.1%):40.5%的患者接受了LVD, 33.3%的患者接受了止血带- alpps, 26.2%的患者接受了混合alpps。35例患者(41.7%)观察到不孕,logistic回归确定基线sFLR (OR 0.89, p = 0.013)、相关手术(OR 3.07, p = 0.046)、右侧三节切除术(OR 5.61, p = 0.031)和非根治性切除术(OR 4.31, p = 0.01)为独立预测因素。无效评分≥4 (n = 36)预测无效结果,判别性好(AUC 0.802; p < 0.001)。结论:增厚术后的技术成功并不总是等同于临床获益。认识到不孕的预测因素可以改善患者的选择和指导更个性化的治疗策略。
{"title":"Futility of major hepatectomies after hypertrophy techniques: predictive factors from a bi-institutional cohort study.","authors":"Cecilia Maina, Victor Lopez-Lopez, Domenico Santangelo, Beatrice Radaelli, José I Tudela, Alvaro Navarro-Barrios, Roberto Brusadin, Guilliermo Carbonell, Simone Gusmini, Luigi Augello, Francesco De Cobelli, Ricardo Robles-Campos, Francesca Ratti","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>hypertrophy techniques expanded surgical indications, but some patients still experience limited clinical benefit. We aimed to identify futility predictive factors in major hepatectomies after liver venous deprivation (LVD) or ALPPS-variants (tourniquet-ALPPS or hybrid-ALPPS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>a bi-institutional cohort study conducted between 01/2015 and 07/2024 including major hepatectomies for oncologic disease following one of the three augmentation strategies.</p><p><strong>Exclusion criteria: </strong>age <18, benign pathology, follow-up < 6-months, and interstage dropout. Futility corresponded to 90-days mortality or very early recurrence (≤6 months). Predictors of futile outcomes were identified by uni- and multi-variate analyses and utilized to build a futility score (0-10).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>84 patients completed the surgical process (dropout rate: 21.1 %): 40.5 % underwent LVD, 33.3 % tourniquet-ALPPS, and 26.2 % hybrid-ALPPS. Futility was observed in 35 patients (41.7 %) and logistic regression identified baseline sFLR (OR 0.89, p = 0.013), associated procedures (OR 3.07, p = 0.046), right trisectionectomy (OR 5.61, p = 0.031), and non-radical resection (OR 4.31, p = 0.01) as independent predictors. A futility score ≥4 (n = 36) predicted a futile outcome with good discrimination (AUC 0.802; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Technical success after hypertrophy techniques not always equates clinical benefit. Recognizing predictors of futility may improve patient selection and guide more personalized therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146137179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-21DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.008
Nicolas J Smith, Serena Y Peng, Simon D Lai, Cameron I Wells, Paul Gardiner, John A Windsor, Adam St J R Bartlett
Background: Optimal perioperative analgesia for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) surgery remains uncertain despite multiple available options. This network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluated the comparative effectiveness of local and regional analgesic techniques on postoperative pain and opiate consumption following open UGI surgery.
Methods: A Bayesian NMA of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and CENTRAL (January 2010-November 2023). The primary outcome was postoperative pain intensity at rest at 24 h.
Results: Fifty-three RCTs (n = 4207 patients) were included. Epidural analgesia provided the greatest reduction in 24-h pain (Mean Difference (MD) -0.976; Credible Interval (CrI) -0.558,-1.401) and opiate consumption (MD -24.717; CrI -16.541,-33.355). The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block significantly reduced pain at 24 and 48 h, while local wound infiltration and continuous wound catheter infusion demonstrated strong opioid-sparing effects. Only the TAP block resulted in a significant reduction in hospital length of stay. Sensitivity and procedure-specific analyses showed results consistent with the primary analysis.
Conclusion: Epidural analgesia provides the greatest early analgesic and opioid-sparing benefit following open UGI surgery, though these effects do not consistently translate into improved recovery outcomes. TAP block and wound-based analgesic techniques offer effective, less invasive alternatives that may be preferable in selected patients.
{"title":"The impact of local and regional analgesia on pain and opioid consumption in patients undergoing open upper gastrointestinal surgery: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.","authors":"Nicolas J Smith, Serena Y Peng, Simon D Lai, Cameron I Wells, Paul Gardiner, John A Windsor, Adam St J R Bartlett","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimal perioperative analgesia for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) surgery remains uncertain despite multiple available options. This network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluated the comparative effectiveness of local and regional analgesic techniques on postoperative pain and opiate consumption following open UGI surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Bayesian NMA of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and CENTRAL (January 2010-November 2023). The primary outcome was postoperative pain intensity at rest at 24 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three RCTs (n = 4207 patients) were included. Epidural analgesia provided the greatest reduction in 24-h pain (Mean Difference (MD) -0.976; Credible Interval (CrI) -0.558,-1.401) and opiate consumption (MD -24.717; CrI -16.541,-33.355). The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block significantly reduced pain at 24 and 48 h, while local wound infiltration and continuous wound catheter infusion demonstrated strong opioid-sparing effects. Only the TAP block resulted in a significant reduction in hospital length of stay. Sensitivity and procedure-specific analyses showed results consistent with the primary analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Epidural analgesia provides the greatest early analgesic and opioid-sparing benefit following open UGI surgery, though these effects do not consistently translate into improved recovery outcomes. TAP block and wound-based analgesic techniques offer effective, less invasive alternatives that may be preferable in selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146124774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-13DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.003
Kai-Zheong Lim, Xin Wang, Jack V Maida, Carmel Zoanetti, Marty Smith, Charles H C Pilgrim
Background: Feeding jejunostomy (FJ) is used for providing early enteral nutrition in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) but can be associated with complications. This study aims to provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the recent literature to evaluate FJ-tube specific complications and clinical outcomes with FJ use in patients undergoing PD.
Methods: The analysis was performed by identifying eligible studies via search of Medline, PubMed and EMBASE databases. Studies comparing outcomes of patients undergoing PD with FJ and those without were included. Studies looking at tube-specific complications were separately reviewed.
Results: A total of 10 studies were included for review which included a total of 7097 patients undergoing PD which included 1712 patients with FJ, and 5385 patients with no FJ. Patients with FJ inserted were associated with a higher rate of DGE (OR 2.24 [1.62-3.10]), p < 0.00001) than those without FJ. FJ tube-specific complications include dislodgement, blockage, relaparotomy, jejunal emphysema with an incidence rate of 1.4-3.5 %.
Conclusion: Use of FJ, with its benefit and risk profile needs to be carefully considered in each select case of PD.
{"title":"Safety and clinical outcomes of feeding jejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Kai-Zheong Lim, Xin Wang, Jack V Maida, Carmel Zoanetti, Marty Smith, Charles H C Pilgrim","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Feeding jejunostomy (FJ) is used for providing early enteral nutrition in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) but can be associated with complications. This study aims to provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the recent literature to evaluate FJ-tube specific complications and clinical outcomes with FJ use in patients undergoing PD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analysis was performed by identifying eligible studies via search of Medline, PubMed and EMBASE databases. Studies comparing outcomes of patients undergoing PD with FJ and those without were included. Studies looking at tube-specific complications were separately reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 studies were included for review which included a total of 7097 patients undergoing PD which included 1712 patients with FJ, and 5385 patients with no FJ. Patients with FJ inserted were associated with a higher rate of DGE (OR 2.24 [1.62-3.10]), p < 0.00001) than those without FJ. FJ tube-specific complications include dislodgement, blockage, relaparotomy, jejunal emphysema with an incidence rate of 1.4-3.5 %.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of FJ, with its benefit and risk profile needs to be carefully considered in each select case of PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146118900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-13DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.004
Sophie Chopinet, Emilie Grégoire, Mustapha Adham, Serban Puia-Negulescu, Emilie Bollon, Jean Hardwigsen, Jérôme Dumortier, Olivier Boillot
Background: Split-derived right liver grafts are often considered marginal. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of adult liver transplantation using either whole liver (WL) or right hemi-liver (RHL).
Methods: This single-center retrospective comparative study included liver transplants that were performed between 1991 and 2010.
Results: A total of 775 liver transplants were performed, including 70 RHL cases (9%). Donors were younger in the RHL group (25 ± 11 vs. 39 ± 16 years, p=0.001). Complications were similar between the RHL and WL groups, except for bilioma, more frequent in RHL group (11.4% vs. 2.1%, p= 0.001). The median follow-up was 15,9 (1,2-33,9) years. Graft and recipient survival at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 20 years were similar between the groups (p=0.298). After matching for recipient age, donor sex, and transplant indication, the incidence of bilioma was comparable. Independent factors significantly affecting survival were recipient age (HR = 1.027, p=0.009), donor age (HR = 1.012, p=0.014), and duration of cold ischemia (HR = 1.002, p=0.018).
Conclusion: The very long-term follow-up of this study reinforces the safety and efficacy of RHL transplantation, demonstrating the role in expanding the donor pool without compromising very long-term outcomes.
{"title":"Right split livers are definitely not marginal grafts: a propensity score analysis of a single centre cohort with very long-term follow-up.","authors":"Sophie Chopinet, Emilie Grégoire, Mustapha Adham, Serban Puia-Negulescu, Emilie Bollon, Jean Hardwigsen, Jérôme Dumortier, Olivier Boillot","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Split-derived right liver grafts are often considered marginal. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of adult liver transplantation using either whole liver (WL) or right hemi-liver (RHL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective comparative study included liver transplants that were performed between 1991 and 2010.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 775 liver transplants were performed, including 70 RHL cases (9%). Donors were younger in the RHL group (25 ± 11 vs. 39 ± 16 years, p=0.001). Complications were similar between the RHL and WL groups, except for bilioma, more frequent in RHL group (11.4% vs. 2.1%, p= 0.001). The median follow-up was 15,9 (1,2-33,9) years. Graft and recipient survival at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 20 years were similar between the groups (p=0.298). After matching for recipient age, donor sex, and transplant indication, the incidence of bilioma was comparable. Independent factors significantly affecting survival were recipient age (HR = 1.027, p=0.009), donor age (HR = 1.012, p=0.014), and duration of cold ischemia (HR = 1.002, p=0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The very long-term follow-up of this study reinforces the safety and efficacy of RHL transplantation, demonstrating the role in expanding the donor pool without compromising very long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146096986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-13DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.040
Adele Gudynaite, Ieva Tveragaite, Povilas Ignatavicius
Background: Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) is a benign liver tumor commonly found in women, often linked to oral contraceptive use. Its occurrence in men is rare and frequently mimics malignant liver lesions, complicating diagnosis and management. This systematic review aims to evaluate the clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, and treatment approaches of FNH in male patients.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD420245397). PubMed, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect were searched up to July 30, 2024, for studies on FNH in male adults. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by multiple reviewers using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
Results: Out of 1771 records, 20 studies including 38 male patients were analyzed. FNH was incidentally discovered in 22 cases, with most patients asymptomatic or having nonspecific symptoms. Imaging often revealed central stellate scars. Surgical resection was performed in 25 patients, primarily due to diagnostic uncertainty. Observation was chosen in 11 cases.
Conclusion: FNH in men is uncommon and presents diagnostic difficulties due to its overlap with malignancies. The high rate of surgical treatment, even in asymptomatic patients, highlights the need for more accurate, non-invasive diagnostic tools.
背景:局灶性结节性增生(FNH)是一种常见于女性的良性肝脏肿瘤,通常与口服避孕药的使用有关。它发生在男性是罕见的,经常模仿恶性肝脏病变,复杂的诊断和管理。本系统综述旨在评估男性FNH患者的临床表现、诊断挑战和治疗方法。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价,并在PROSPERO数据库注册(CRD420245397)。PubMed, Web of Science和ScienceDirect检索了截至2024年7月30日的男性成人FNH研究。数据提取和质量评估由多名评论者使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表独立进行。结果:在1771份记录中,分析了20项研究,其中包括38名男性患者。22例偶然发现FNH,大多数患者无症状或有非特异性症状。影像常显示中央星状瘢痕。手术切除25例患者,主要是由于诊断不确定。选择观察11例。结论:FNH在男性中并不常见,并且由于其与恶性肿瘤重叠而呈现诊断困难。手术治疗的高比率,甚至在无症状的患者,突出需要更准确,非侵入性的诊断工具。
{"title":"Focal nodular hyperplasia in men: a systematic review.","authors":"Adele Gudynaite, Ieva Tveragaite, Povilas Ignatavicius","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) is a benign liver tumor commonly found in women, often linked to oral contraceptive use. Its occurrence in men is rare and frequently mimics malignant liver lesions, complicating diagnosis and management. This systematic review aims to evaluate the clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, and treatment approaches of FNH in male patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD420245397). PubMed, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect were searched up to July 30, 2024, for studies on FNH in male adults. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by multiple reviewers using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1771 records, 20 studies including 38 male patients were analyzed. FNH was incidentally discovered in 22 cases, with most patients asymptomatic or having nonspecific symptoms. Imaging often revealed central stellate scars. Surgical resection was performed in 25 patients, primarily due to diagnostic uncertainty. Observation was chosen in 11 cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FNH in men is uncommon and presents diagnostic difficulties due to its overlap with malignancies. The high rate of surgical treatment, even in asymptomatic patients, highlights the need for more accurate, non-invasive diagnostic tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146046538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-12DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.001
Vera Hartman, Bart Bracke, Thiery Chapelle, Bart Hendrikx, Frederik Huysentruyt, Ellen Liekens, Ella Roelant, Eline Roeyen, Dirk Ysebaert, Geert Roeyen
Background: The optimal test for diagnosing pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) remains debated. This study compares the diagnostic accuracy of faecal elastase-1 (FE-1) and the 13C Mixed Triglyceride Breath Test (MTGT) in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery.
Methods: Patients undergoing pancreatic resection at Antwerp University Hospital (2016-2023) had FE-1 and MTGT testing before and after surgery. The MTGT was used as the reference standard. Agreement between both tests was evaluated using Cohen's kappa.
Results: Preoperatively, in a patient cohort of 249 patients, PEI was detected in 25.3 % using MTGT and 39.6 % using FE-1 (cutoff <200 μg/g). The sensitivity and specificity of FE-1 were 63.5 % and 68.3 %, respectively. Agreement was fair (κ = 0.27). After pancreatoduodenectomy, the prevalence of PEI increased to 60 % (MTGT) and 92.2 % (FE-1), with only slight agreement between tests (κ = 0.17). Although FE-1 demonstrated high sensitivity (98.1 %), its specificity was poor (16.7 %), resulting in an 83.5 % false-positive rate.
Conclusions: In patients undergoing pancreatic surgery, especially after pancreatoduodenectomy, the agreement between MTGT and FE-1 is substantially lower than expected. FE-1 demostrates low specificity and a high false-positive rate, resulting in overdiagnosis and unnecessary economic and patient burden.
{"title":"Comparing faecal Elastase-1 and <sup>13</sup>C mixed triglyceride breath test in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery.","authors":"Vera Hartman, Bart Bracke, Thiery Chapelle, Bart Hendrikx, Frederik Huysentruyt, Ellen Liekens, Ella Roelant, Eline Roeyen, Dirk Ysebaert, Geert Roeyen","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal test for diagnosing pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) remains debated. This study compares the diagnostic accuracy of faecal elastase-1 (FE-1) and the <sup>13</sup>C Mixed Triglyceride Breath Test (MTGT) in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing pancreatic resection at Antwerp University Hospital (2016-2023) had FE-1 and MTGT testing before and after surgery. The MTGT was used as the reference standard. Agreement between both tests was evaluated using Cohen's kappa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperatively, in a patient cohort of 249 patients, PEI was detected in 25.3 % using MTGT and 39.6 % using FE-1 (cutoff <200 μg/g). The sensitivity and specificity of FE-1 were 63.5 % and 68.3 %, respectively. Agreement was fair (κ = 0.27). After pancreatoduodenectomy, the prevalence of PEI increased to 60 % (MTGT) and 92.2 % (FE-1), with only slight agreement between tests (κ = 0.17). Although FE-1 demonstrated high sensitivity (98.1 %), its specificity was poor (16.7 %), resulting in an 83.5 % false-positive rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients undergoing pancreatic surgery, especially after pancreatoduodenectomy, the agreement between MTGT and FE-1 is substantially lower than expected. FE-1 demostrates low specificity and a high false-positive rate, resulting in overdiagnosis and unnecessary economic and patient burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146046536","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.039
Giacomo Waller, Hideo Takahashi, Yuki Bekki, Rhea Raj, Salvatore Amodeo, Michael Buckstein, Maria Isabel Fiel, Marcelo E Facciuto, Myron Schwartz, Ganesh Gunasekaran
Introduction: The prognostic impact of positive bile duct margins (R1) after resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) remains unclear, and evidence on the role of adjuvant radiation (RT) is limited.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 110 patients who underwent curative-intent resection for PHC from 1997 to 2018. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors of OS and DFS.
Results: R1 margins were present in 50 patients (45.5 %). Median OS and DFS for the cohort were 47.5 and 30.2 months. OS and DFS did not differ by margin status. On multivariable analysis, lymph node metastasis independently predicted worse OS (HR 3.81; p < 0.001) and DFS (HR 3.32; p = 0.001), while larger tumor size predicted recurrence (HR 3.12; p = 0.001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS (HR 0.45; p = 0.049). Among R1 patients, adjuvant RT was associated with longer DFS (68.6 vs 17.8 months; p = 0.049) but not OS.
Conclusions: R1 resection was not associated with inferior survival in this cohort. Lymph node metastasis was the strongest prognostic factor. Adjuvant RT was associated with improved DFS in the R1 patients, supporting its use for local control and warranting prospective validation.
导论:肝门周围胆管癌(PHC)切除术后胆管边缘阳性(R1)对预后的影响尚不清楚,辅助放疗(RT)的作用证据有限。方法:我们回顾性分析了1997年至2018年110例接受治愈性PHC切除术的患者。主要结局是总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)。进行单因素和多因素分析以确定OS和DFS的危险因素。结果:50例患者(45.5%)存在R1边缘。该队列的中位OS和DFS分别为47.5和30.2个月。OS和DFS在边际状态上没有差异。在多变量分析中,淋巴结转移独立预测较差的OS (HR 3.81, p < 0.001)和DFS (HR 3.32, p = 0.001),而较大的肿瘤大小预测复发(HR 3.12, p = 0.001)。辅助化疗与OS改善相关(HR 0.45; p = 0.049)。在R1患者中,辅助放疗与更长的DFS相关(68.6个月vs 17.8个月;p = 0.049),但与OS无关。结论:在该队列中,R1切除与较差的生存率无关。淋巴结转移是最强的预后因素。辅助放疗与改善R1患者的DFS相关,支持其用于局部控制并保证前瞻性验证。
{"title":"Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: microscopic positive margin and its clinical relevance.","authors":"Giacomo Waller, Hideo Takahashi, Yuki Bekki, Rhea Raj, Salvatore Amodeo, Michael Buckstein, Maria Isabel Fiel, Marcelo E Facciuto, Myron Schwartz, Ganesh Gunasekaran","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.039","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The prognostic impact of positive bile duct margins (R1) after resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) remains unclear, and evidence on the role of adjuvant radiation (RT) is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 110 patients who underwent curative-intent resection for PHC from 1997 to 2018. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors of OS and DFS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>R1 margins were present in 50 patients (45.5 %). Median OS and DFS for the cohort were 47.5 and 30.2 months. OS and DFS did not differ by margin status. On multivariable analysis, lymph node metastasis independently predicted worse OS (HR 3.81; p < 0.001) and DFS (HR 3.32; p = 0.001), while larger tumor size predicted recurrence (HR 3.12; p = 0.001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS (HR 0.45; p = 0.049). Among R1 patients, adjuvant RT was associated with longer DFS (68.6 vs 17.8 months; p = 0.049) but not OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>R1 resection was not associated with inferior survival in this cohort. Lymph node metastasis was the strongest prognostic factor. Adjuvant RT was associated with improved DFS in the R1 patients, supporting its use for local control and warranting prospective validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146113105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-07DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.038
Berkay Demirors, Christopher Kaltenmeier, Abiha Abdullah, Vrishketan Sethi, Charbel Elias, Frank Spitz, Jason Mial-Anthony, Timothy Fokken, Shwe Han, Sabin Subedi, Godwin Packiaraj, Marta Minervini, Michele Molinari
Background: Oncological characteristics and underlying liver function influence the outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are predictive instruments. However, for patients undergoing hepatic resection, their value remains unclear, particularly in Western populations.
Methods: ALBI, NLR and PLR were derived from blood tests obtained prior to surgery in 156 consecutive patients who underwent R0 hepatic resections between 2015 and 2020 at a Western academic center. Associations with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression models.
Results: Median age was 60 years; 72 % of patients were male, and 45 % had underlying cirrhosis. On univariate analysis, ALBI grade was associated with OS and PFS and NLR with OS, but neither retained significance in multivariate models. PLR was not predictive. Cirrhosis (HR 2.32), ECOG performance status ≥2 (HR 2.67), and AFP >100 ng/mL (HR 2.89) were independently associated with worse OS in multivariate analysis. Tumor number ≥2 and AFP >100 ng/mL were two independent predictors for PFS.
Conclusion: ALBI, NLR and PLR did not emerge as clinically relevant predictive value for OS and PFS in patients undergoing resection for HCC.
{"title":"Traditional clinical predictors outperform ALBI, NLR, and PLR after curative hepatic resection for HCC in a Western cohort.","authors":"Berkay Demirors, Christopher Kaltenmeier, Abiha Abdullah, Vrishketan Sethi, Charbel Elias, Frank Spitz, Jason Mial-Anthony, Timothy Fokken, Shwe Han, Sabin Subedi, Godwin Packiaraj, Marta Minervini, Michele Molinari","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oncological characteristics and underlying liver function influence the outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are predictive instruments. However, for patients undergoing hepatic resection, their value remains unclear, particularly in Western populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ALBI, NLR and PLR were derived from blood tests obtained prior to surgery in 156 consecutive patients who underwent R0 hepatic resections between 2015 and 2020 at a Western academic center. Associations with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median age was 60 years; 72 % of patients were male, and 45 % had underlying cirrhosis. On univariate analysis, ALBI grade was associated with OS and PFS and NLR with OS, but neither retained significance in multivariate models. PLR was not predictive. Cirrhosis (HR 2.32), ECOG performance status ≥2 (HR 2.67), and AFP >100 ng/mL (HR 2.89) were independently associated with worse OS in multivariate analysis. Tumor number ≥2 and AFP >100 ng/mL were two independent predictors for PFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ALBI, NLR and PLR did not emerge as clinically relevant predictive value for OS and PFS in patients undergoing resection for HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146092839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-07DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.037
Nina Eng, Elana Taute, Hien Dang, Sean P Martin
Introduction: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common indication for liver transplant. We set out to identify high performing HCC centers to understand their listing and donor acceptance patterns.
Methods: The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data was quired identifying patients with HCC. Centers were stratified into high functioning (HFC) and low functioning centers (LFC) based on the percentage of waitlisted patients who were transplanted and patients who died or were delisted (DDL).
Results: Multivariable analysis identified utilization of donor after circulatory death (DCD) (OR 2.25 p < 0.01) as the largest contributing factor in HFC. The current LFC transplant to DDL ratio is 1.3 whereas HFC have experiences a 1.8-fold increase from the implementation of acuity circle (AC) allocation with a transplant to DDL ratio of 9.5. Multivariable analysis suggests that this gain is related to adopting the use of DCD donor after the implantation of AC allocation (OR 4.22, p < 0.01).
Conclusions: High functioning HCC transplant center phenotype exists and appears to be most driven by the utilization of DCD donors. AC allocation has served to exacerbate disparities between HFC and LFC with the key adaptation made being the increased use of DCD donors.
肝细胞癌(HCC)是肝移植的常见适应症。我们着手确定高性能HCC中心,以了解其上市和捐赠者接受模式。方法:通过器官获取和移植网络的数据来识别HCC患者。根据等待移植的患者和死亡或被除名的患者(DDL)的百分比,将中心分为高功能中心(HFC)和低功能中心(LFC)。结果:多变量分析发现,循环死亡后供者的利用(OR 2.25 p < 0.01)是HFC的最大影响因素。目前LFC移植与DDL之比为1.3,而HFC移植与DDL之比为9.5,从实施视圆(AC)分配开始增长了1.8倍。多变量分析表明,该增益与植入AC配型后采用DCD供体有关(OR 4.22, p < 0.01)。结论:高功能HCC移植中心表型存在,并且似乎主要由DCD供体的使用驱动。AC的分配加剧了氢氟碳化合物和低碳碳化合物之间的差距,关键的适应措施是增加使用DCD捐助者。
{"title":"Identification of high functioning hepatocellular carcinoma transplant centers in the modern allocation system.","authors":"Nina Eng, Elana Taute, Hien Dang, Sean P Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.037","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common indication for liver transplant. We set out to identify high performing HCC centers to understand their listing and donor acceptance patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data was quired identifying patients with HCC. Centers were stratified into high functioning (HFC) and low functioning centers (LFC) based on the percentage of waitlisted patients who were transplanted and patients who died or were delisted (DDL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariable analysis identified utilization of donor after circulatory death (DCD) (OR 2.25 p < 0.01) as the largest contributing factor in HFC. The current LFC transplant to DDL ratio is 1.3 whereas HFC have experiences a 1.8-fold increase from the implementation of acuity circle (AC) allocation with a transplant to DDL ratio of 9.5. Multivariable analysis suggests that this gain is related to adopting the use of DCD donor after the implantation of AC allocation (OR 4.22, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High functioning HCC transplant center phenotype exists and appears to be most driven by the utilization of DCD donors. AC allocation has served to exacerbate disparities between HFC and LFC with the key adaptation made being the increased use of DCD donors.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146040513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.10.006
Inhyuck Lee , Younsoo Seo , Go-Won Choi , Yoon Soo Chae , Won-Gun Yun , Youngmin Han , Hye-Sol Jung , Young Jae Cho , Wooil Kwon , Jin-Young Jang , Joon Seong Park
Background
Distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) has poor prognosis, with >50% affected patients experiencing early recurrence (ER) within 12 months after curative-intent surgery. This retrospective study analyzed ER characteristics, survival outcomes, and risk factors of DCC.
Methods
We categorized 519 patients with DCC who underwent curative-intent surgery at Seoul National University Hospital (2008–2023) into ER (n=115) and non-ER (n=404) groups. Primary endpoints were ER and overall survival (OS). We compared OS between ER and an additional non-curative reference cohort (R2/M1, n=53). Cutoffs for continuous variables were derived using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve/Youden.
Results
Median OS and recurrence-free survival were 53.6 and 52.4 months, respectively. Independent ER predictors were preoperative CA19-9 of >70 U/mL (hazard ratio [HR], 1.58), BMI of ≤21.0 kg/m² (HR, 2.04) or >25.0 kg/m² (HR 1.81), LNR of >15% (HR, 2.01), and postoperative CA19-9 of >37 U/mL (HR, 1.71). OS was similar between ER and R2/M1 groups (16.8 vs 15.6 months; p=0.998). In subgroup analyses stratified by ER status, adjuvant chemotherapy (including 5-FU), radiotherapy, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy were not associated with improved OS.
Conclusion
ER after curative-intent resection has outcomes comparable to non-curative disease, supporting risk-adapted staging and evaluation of neoadjuvant strategies for high-risk patients.
{"title":"Risk factors and early recurrence patterns following curative-intent resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma","authors":"Inhyuck Lee , Younsoo Seo , Go-Won Choi , Yoon Soo Chae , Won-Gun Yun , Youngmin Han , Hye-Sol Jung , Young Jae Cho , Wooil Kwon , Jin-Young Jang , Joon Seong Park","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.10.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.10.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) has poor prognosis, with >50% affected patients experiencing early recurrence (ER) within 12 months after curative-intent surgery. This retrospective study analyzed ER characteristics, survival outcomes, and risk factors of DCC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We categorized 519 patients with DCC who underwent curative-intent surgery at Seoul National University Hospital (2008–2023) into ER (n=115) and non-ER (n=404) groups. Primary endpoints were ER and overall survival (OS). We compared OS between ER and an additional non-curative reference cohort (R2/M1, n=53). Cutoffs for continuous variables were derived using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve/Youden.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Median OS and recurrence-free survival were 53.6 and 52.4 months, respectively. Independent ER predictors were preoperative CA19-9 of >70 U/mL (hazard ratio [HR], 1.58), BMI of ≤21.0 kg/m² (HR, 2.04) or >25.0 kg/m² (HR 1.81), LNR of >15% (HR, 2.01), and postoperative CA19-9 of >37 U/mL (HR, 1.71). OS was similar between ER and R2/M1 groups (16.8 vs 15.6 months; p=0.998). In subgroup analyses stratified by ER status, adjuvant chemotherapy (including 5-FU), radiotherapy, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy were not associated with improved OS.</div></div><div><h3><strong>Conclusion</strong></h3><div>ER after curative-intent resection has outcomes comparable to non-curative disease, supporting risk-adapted staging and evaluation of neoadjuvant strategies for high-risk patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":"28 1","pages":"Pages 50-59"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145482078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}