首页 > 最新文献

Hpb最新文献

英文 中文
Futility of major hepatectomies after hypertrophy techniques: predictive factors from a bi-institutional cohort study. 肥厚技术后大肝切除术的无效:来自双机构队列研究的预测因素。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2026-01-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.009
Cecilia Maina, Victor Lopez-Lopez, Domenico Santangelo, Beatrice Radaelli, José I Tudela, Alvaro Navarro-Barrios, Roberto Brusadin, Guilliermo Carbonell, Simone Gusmini, Luigi Augello, Francesco De Cobelli, Ricardo Robles-Campos, Francesca Ratti

Background: hypertrophy techniques expanded surgical indications, but some patients still experience limited clinical benefit. We aimed to identify futility predictive factors in major hepatectomies after liver venous deprivation (LVD) or ALPPS-variants (tourniquet-ALPPS or hybrid-ALPPS).

Methods: a bi-institutional cohort study conducted between 01/2015 and 07/2024 including major hepatectomies for oncologic disease following one of the three augmentation strategies.

Exclusion criteria: age <18, benign pathology, follow-up < 6-months, and interstage dropout. Futility corresponded to 90-days mortality or very early recurrence (≤6 months). Predictors of futile outcomes were identified by uni- and multi-variate analyses and utilized to build a futility score (0-10).

Results: 84 patients completed the surgical process (dropout rate: 21.1 %): 40.5 % underwent LVD, 33.3 % tourniquet-ALPPS, and 26.2 % hybrid-ALPPS. Futility was observed in 35 patients (41.7 %) and logistic regression identified baseline sFLR (OR 0.89, p = 0.013), associated procedures (OR 3.07, p = 0.046), right trisectionectomy (OR 5.61, p = 0.031), and non-radical resection (OR 4.31, p = 0.01) as independent predictors. A futility score ≥4 (n = 36) predicted a futile outcome with good discrimination (AUC 0.802; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Technical success after hypertrophy techniques not always equates clinical benefit. Recognizing predictors of futility may improve patient selection and guide more personalized therapeutic strategies.

背景:肥厚技术扩大了手术指征,但一些患者的临床获益仍然有限。我们的目的是确定肝静脉剥夺(LVD)或alpps变体(止血带- alpps或混合alpps)后主要肝切除术的无效预测因素。方法:在2015年1月至2024年7月期间进行的一项双机构队列研究,包括在三种增强策略之一后进行肿瘤疾病大肝切除术。结果:84例患者完成了手术(辍学率:21.1%):40.5%的患者接受了LVD, 33.3%的患者接受了止血带- alpps, 26.2%的患者接受了混合alpps。35例患者(41.7%)观察到不孕,logistic回归确定基线sFLR (OR 0.89, p = 0.013)、相关手术(OR 3.07, p = 0.046)、右侧三节切除术(OR 5.61, p = 0.031)和非根治性切除术(OR 4.31, p = 0.01)为独立预测因素。无效评分≥4 (n = 36)预测无效结果,判别性好(AUC 0.802; p < 0.001)。结论:增厚术后的技术成功并不总是等同于临床获益。认识到不孕的预测因素可以改善患者的选择和指导更个性化的治疗策略。
{"title":"Futility of major hepatectomies after hypertrophy techniques: predictive factors from a bi-institutional cohort study.","authors":"Cecilia Maina, Victor Lopez-Lopez, Domenico Santangelo, Beatrice Radaelli, José I Tudela, Alvaro Navarro-Barrios, Roberto Brusadin, Guilliermo Carbonell, Simone Gusmini, Luigi Augello, Francesco De Cobelli, Ricardo Robles-Campos, Francesca Ratti","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>hypertrophy techniques expanded surgical indications, but some patients still experience limited clinical benefit. We aimed to identify futility predictive factors in major hepatectomies after liver venous deprivation (LVD) or ALPPS-variants (tourniquet-ALPPS or hybrid-ALPPS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>a bi-institutional cohort study conducted between 01/2015 and 07/2024 including major hepatectomies for oncologic disease following one of the three augmentation strategies.</p><p><strong>Exclusion criteria: </strong>age <18, benign pathology, follow-up < 6-months, and interstage dropout. Futility corresponded to 90-days mortality or very early recurrence (≤6 months). Predictors of futile outcomes were identified by uni- and multi-variate analyses and utilized to build a futility score (0-10).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>84 patients completed the surgical process (dropout rate: 21.1 %): 40.5 % underwent LVD, 33.3 % tourniquet-ALPPS, and 26.2 % hybrid-ALPPS. Futility was observed in 35 patients (41.7 %) and logistic regression identified baseline sFLR (OR 0.89, p = 0.013), associated procedures (OR 3.07, p = 0.046), right trisectionectomy (OR 5.61, p = 0.031), and non-radical resection (OR 4.31, p = 0.01) as independent predictors. A futility score ≥4 (n = 36) predicted a futile outcome with good discrimination (AUC 0.802; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Technical success after hypertrophy techniques not always equates clinical benefit. Recognizing predictors of futility may improve patient selection and guide more personalized therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146137179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of local and regional analgesia on pain and opioid consumption in patients undergoing open upper gastrointestinal surgery: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. 局部和局部镇痛对开放性上消化道手术患者疼痛和阿片类药物消耗的影响:随机对照试验的网络meta分析
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.008
Nicolas J Smith, Serena Y Peng, Simon D Lai, Cameron I Wells, Paul Gardiner, John A Windsor, Adam St J R Bartlett

Background: Optimal perioperative analgesia for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) surgery remains uncertain despite multiple available options. This network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluated the comparative effectiveness of local and regional analgesic techniques on postoperative pain and opiate consumption following open UGI surgery.

Methods: A Bayesian NMA of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and CENTRAL (January 2010-November 2023). The primary outcome was postoperative pain intensity at rest at 24 h.

Results: Fifty-three RCTs (n = 4207 patients) were included. Epidural analgesia provided the greatest reduction in 24-h pain (Mean Difference (MD) -0.976; Credible Interval (CrI) -0.558,-1.401) and opiate consumption (MD -24.717; CrI -16.541,-33.355). The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block significantly reduced pain at 24 and 48 h, while local wound infiltration and continuous wound catheter infusion demonstrated strong opioid-sparing effects. Only the TAP block resulted in a significant reduction in hospital length of stay. Sensitivity and procedure-specific analyses showed results consistent with the primary analysis.

Conclusion: Epidural analgesia provides the greatest early analgesic and opioid-sparing benefit following open UGI surgery, though these effects do not consistently translate into improved recovery outcomes. TAP block and wound-based analgesic techniques offer effective, less invasive alternatives that may be preferable in selected patients.

背景:尽管有多种可行的选择,上消化道手术的最佳围手术期镇痛仍然不确定。该网络meta分析(NMA)评估了局部和区域镇痛技术对开放性UGI手术后疼痛和阿片类药物消耗的比较效果。方法:使用MEDLINE、Embase、PubMed和CENTRAL(2010年1月至2023年11月)对随机对照试验(rct)进行贝叶斯NMA分析。主要结局为术后24小时休息时疼痛强度。结果:纳入53项随机对照试验(n = 4207例患者)。硬膜外镇痛能最大程度地减轻24小时疼痛(平均差值(MD) -0.976;可信区间(CrI) -0.558,-1.401)和鸦片用量(MD -24.717; CrI -16.541,-33.355)。经腹平面(TAP)阻滞可显著减轻24和48 h疼痛,而局部伤口浸润和持续伤口导管输注显示出强烈的阿片类药物节约作用。只有TAP阻断导致住院时间的显著减少。敏感性和程序特异性分析结果与初步分析一致。结论:硬膜外镇痛提供了开放UGI手术后最大的早期镇痛和阿片类药物节约效益,尽管这些效果并不总是转化为改善的恢复结果。TAP阻滞和基于伤口的镇痛技术提供了有效的,侵入性较小的替代方案,可能更适合某些患者。
{"title":"The impact of local and regional analgesia on pain and opioid consumption in patients undergoing open upper gastrointestinal surgery: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.","authors":"Nicolas J Smith, Serena Y Peng, Simon D Lai, Cameron I Wells, Paul Gardiner, John A Windsor, Adam St J R Bartlett","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimal perioperative analgesia for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) surgery remains uncertain despite multiple available options. This network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluated the comparative effectiveness of local and regional analgesic techniques on postoperative pain and opiate consumption following open UGI surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Bayesian NMA of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and CENTRAL (January 2010-November 2023). The primary outcome was postoperative pain intensity at rest at 24 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three RCTs (n = 4207 patients) were included. Epidural analgesia provided the greatest reduction in 24-h pain (Mean Difference (MD) -0.976; Credible Interval (CrI) -0.558,-1.401) and opiate consumption (MD -24.717; CrI -16.541,-33.355). The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block significantly reduced pain at 24 and 48 h, while local wound infiltration and continuous wound catheter infusion demonstrated strong opioid-sparing effects. Only the TAP block resulted in a significant reduction in hospital length of stay. Sensitivity and procedure-specific analyses showed results consistent with the primary analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Epidural analgesia provides the greatest early analgesic and opioid-sparing benefit following open UGI surgery, though these effects do not consistently translate into improved recovery outcomes. TAP block and wound-based analgesic techniques offer effective, less invasive alternatives that may be preferable in selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146124774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety and clinical outcomes of feeding jejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 胰十二指肠切除术中喂养式空肠造口的安全性和临床结果:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.003
Kai-Zheong Lim, Xin Wang, Jack V Maida, Carmel Zoanetti, Marty Smith, Charles H C Pilgrim

Background: Feeding jejunostomy (FJ) is used for providing early enteral nutrition in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) but can be associated with complications. This study aims to provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the recent literature to evaluate FJ-tube specific complications and clinical outcomes with FJ use in patients undergoing PD.

Methods: The analysis was performed by identifying eligible studies via search of Medline, PubMed and EMBASE databases. Studies comparing outcomes of patients undergoing PD with FJ and those without were included. Studies looking at tube-specific complications were separately reviewed.

Results: A total of 10 studies were included for review which included a total of 7097 patients undergoing PD which included 1712 patients with FJ, and 5385 patients with no FJ. Patients with FJ inserted were associated with a higher rate of DGE (OR 2.24 [1.62-3.10]), p < 0.00001) than those without FJ. FJ tube-specific complications include dislodgement, blockage, relaparotomy, jejunal emphysema with an incidence rate of 1.4-3.5 %.

Conclusion: Use of FJ, with its benefit and risk profile needs to be carefully considered in each select case of PD.

背景:喂养式空肠造口术(FJ)用于胰十二指肠切除术(PD)患者的早期肠内营养,但可能与并发症相关。本研究旨在对近期文献进行更新的系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估FJ管在PD患者中使用的特异性并发症和临床结果。方法:通过检索Medline、PubMed和EMBASE数据库,确定符合条件的研究进行分析。比较PD合并FJ患者和未合并FJ患者结果的研究被纳入。对输卵管特异性并发症的研究分别进行了综述。结果:共纳入10项研究,共纳入7097例PD患者,其中有FJ的患者1712例,无FJ的患者5385例。植入FJ的患者的DGE发生率高于未植入FJ的患者(OR为2.24 [1.62-3.10],p < 0.00001)。FJ管特异性并发症包括脱位、堵塞、再开腹、空肠肺气肿,发生率为1.4- 3.5%。结论:在每一个选定的PD病例中,需要仔细考虑FJ的使用及其益处和风险。
{"title":"Safety and clinical outcomes of feeding jejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Kai-Zheong Lim, Xin Wang, Jack V Maida, Carmel Zoanetti, Marty Smith, Charles H C Pilgrim","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Feeding jejunostomy (FJ) is used for providing early enteral nutrition in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) but can be associated with complications. This study aims to provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the recent literature to evaluate FJ-tube specific complications and clinical outcomes with FJ use in patients undergoing PD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analysis was performed by identifying eligible studies via search of Medline, PubMed and EMBASE databases. Studies comparing outcomes of patients undergoing PD with FJ and those without were included. Studies looking at tube-specific complications were separately reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 studies were included for review which included a total of 7097 patients undergoing PD which included 1712 patients with FJ, and 5385 patients with no FJ. Patients with FJ inserted were associated with a higher rate of DGE (OR 2.24 [1.62-3.10]), p < 0.00001) than those without FJ. FJ tube-specific complications include dislodgement, blockage, relaparotomy, jejunal emphysema with an incidence rate of 1.4-3.5 %.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of FJ, with its benefit and risk profile needs to be carefully considered in each select case of PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146118900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Right split livers are definitely not marginal grafts: a propensity score analysis of a single centre cohort with very long-term follow-up. 右裂肝绝对不是边缘移植:一项长期随访的单中心队列倾向评分分析。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.004
Sophie Chopinet, Emilie Grégoire, Mustapha Adham, Serban Puia-Negulescu, Emilie Bollon, Jean Hardwigsen, Jérôme Dumortier, Olivier Boillot

Background: Split-derived right liver grafts are often considered marginal. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of adult liver transplantation using either whole liver (WL) or right hemi-liver (RHL).

Methods: This single-center retrospective comparative study included liver transplants that were performed between 1991 and 2010.

Results: A total of 775 liver transplants were performed, including 70 RHL cases (9%). Donors were younger in the RHL group (25 ± 11 vs. 39 ± 16 years, p=0.001). Complications were similar between the RHL and WL groups, except for bilioma, more frequent in RHL group (11.4% vs. 2.1%, p= 0.001). The median follow-up was 15,9 (1,2-33,9) years. Graft and recipient survival at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 20 years were similar between the groups (p=0.298). After matching for recipient age, donor sex, and transplant indication, the incidence of bilioma was comparable. Independent factors significantly affecting survival were recipient age (HR = 1.027, p=0.009), donor age (HR = 1.012, p=0.014), and duration of cold ischemia (HR = 1.002, p=0.018).

Conclusion: The very long-term follow-up of this study reinforces the safety and efficacy of RHL transplantation, demonstrating the role in expanding the donor pool without compromising very long-term outcomes.

背景:裂源性右肝移植通常被认为是边缘性的。本研究旨在比较使用全肝(WL)或右半肝(RHL)的成人肝移植的长期结果。方法:这项单中心回顾性比较研究纳入了1991年至2010年间进行的肝移植手术。结果:共行肝移植775例,其中RHL 70例(9%)。RHL组的献血者更年轻(25±11岁比39±16岁,p=0.001)。除了胆囊瘤外,RHL组和WL组的并发症相似(11.4%比2.1%,p= 0.001)。中位随访时间为15.9(1,2-33,9)年。移植物和受体在1、3、5、10和20年的存活率在两组之间相似(p=0.298)。在匹配受者年龄、供者性别和移植指征后,胆囊瘤的发生率具有可比性。影响存活的独立因素有受体年龄(HR = 1.027, p=0.009)、供体年龄(HR = 1.012, p=0.014)、冷缺血时间(HR = 1.002, p=0.018)。结论:本研究的长期随访加强了RHL移植的安全性和有效性,证明了在不影响长期结果的情况下扩大供体池的作用。
{"title":"Right split livers are definitely not marginal grafts: a propensity score analysis of a single centre cohort with very long-term follow-up.","authors":"Sophie Chopinet, Emilie Grégoire, Mustapha Adham, Serban Puia-Negulescu, Emilie Bollon, Jean Hardwigsen, Jérôme Dumortier, Olivier Boillot","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Split-derived right liver grafts are often considered marginal. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of adult liver transplantation using either whole liver (WL) or right hemi-liver (RHL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective comparative study included liver transplants that were performed between 1991 and 2010.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 775 liver transplants were performed, including 70 RHL cases (9%). Donors were younger in the RHL group (25 ± 11 vs. 39 ± 16 years, p=0.001). Complications were similar between the RHL and WL groups, except for bilioma, more frequent in RHL group (11.4% vs. 2.1%, p= 0.001). The median follow-up was 15,9 (1,2-33,9) years. Graft and recipient survival at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 20 years were similar between the groups (p=0.298). After matching for recipient age, donor sex, and transplant indication, the incidence of bilioma was comparable. Independent factors significantly affecting survival were recipient age (HR = 1.027, p=0.009), donor age (HR = 1.012, p=0.014), and duration of cold ischemia (HR = 1.002, p=0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The very long-term follow-up of this study reinforces the safety and efficacy of RHL transplantation, demonstrating the role in expanding the donor pool without compromising very long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146096986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Focal nodular hyperplasia in men: a systematic review. 男性局灶性结节增生:系统综述。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.040
Adele Gudynaite, Ieva Tveragaite, Povilas Ignatavicius

Background: Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) is a benign liver tumor commonly found in women, often linked to oral contraceptive use. Its occurrence in men is rare and frequently mimics malignant liver lesions, complicating diagnosis and management. This systematic review aims to evaluate the clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, and treatment approaches of FNH in male patients.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD420245397). PubMed, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect were searched up to July 30, 2024, for studies on FNH in male adults. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by multiple reviewers using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Results: Out of 1771 records, 20 studies including 38 male patients were analyzed. FNH was incidentally discovered in 22 cases, with most patients asymptomatic or having nonspecific symptoms. Imaging often revealed central stellate scars. Surgical resection was performed in 25 patients, primarily due to diagnostic uncertainty. Observation was chosen in 11 cases.

Conclusion: FNH in men is uncommon and presents diagnostic difficulties due to its overlap with malignancies. The high rate of surgical treatment, even in asymptomatic patients, highlights the need for more accurate, non-invasive diagnostic tools.

背景:局灶性结节性增生(FNH)是一种常见于女性的良性肝脏肿瘤,通常与口服避孕药的使用有关。它发生在男性是罕见的,经常模仿恶性肝脏病变,复杂的诊断和管理。本系统综述旨在评估男性FNH患者的临床表现、诊断挑战和治疗方法。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价,并在PROSPERO数据库注册(CRD420245397)。PubMed, Web of Science和ScienceDirect检索了截至2024年7月30日的男性成人FNH研究。数据提取和质量评估由多名评论者使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表独立进行。结果:在1771份记录中,分析了20项研究,其中包括38名男性患者。22例偶然发现FNH,大多数患者无症状或有非特异性症状。影像常显示中央星状瘢痕。手术切除25例患者,主要是由于诊断不确定。选择观察11例。结论:FNH在男性中并不常见,并且由于其与恶性肿瘤重叠而呈现诊断困难。手术治疗的高比率,甚至在无症状的患者,突出需要更准确,非侵入性的诊断工具。
{"title":"Focal nodular hyperplasia in men: a systematic review.","authors":"Adele Gudynaite, Ieva Tveragaite, Povilas Ignatavicius","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) is a benign liver tumor commonly found in women, often linked to oral contraceptive use. Its occurrence in men is rare and frequently mimics malignant liver lesions, complicating diagnosis and management. This systematic review aims to evaluate the clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, and treatment approaches of FNH in male patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD420245397). PubMed, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect were searched up to July 30, 2024, for studies on FNH in male adults. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by multiple reviewers using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1771 records, 20 studies including 38 male patients were analyzed. FNH was incidentally discovered in 22 cases, with most patients asymptomatic or having nonspecific symptoms. Imaging often revealed central stellate scars. Surgical resection was performed in 25 patients, primarily due to diagnostic uncertainty. Observation was chosen in 11 cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FNH in men is uncommon and presents diagnostic difficulties due to its overlap with malignancies. The high rate of surgical treatment, even in asymptomatic patients, highlights the need for more accurate, non-invasive diagnostic tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146046538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing faecal Elastase-1 and 13C mixed triglyceride breath test in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery. 比较胰腺手术患者粪便弹性酶-1和13C混合甘油三酯呼吸试验。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.001
Vera Hartman, Bart Bracke, Thiery Chapelle, Bart Hendrikx, Frederik Huysentruyt, Ellen Liekens, Ella Roelant, Eline Roeyen, Dirk Ysebaert, Geert Roeyen

Background: The optimal test for diagnosing pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) remains debated. This study compares the diagnostic accuracy of faecal elastase-1 (FE-1) and the 13C Mixed Triglyceride Breath Test (MTGT) in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery.

Methods: Patients undergoing pancreatic resection at Antwerp University Hospital (2016-2023) had FE-1 and MTGT testing before and after surgery. The MTGT was used as the reference standard. Agreement between both tests was evaluated using Cohen's kappa.

Results: Preoperatively, in a patient cohort of 249 patients, PEI was detected in 25.3 % using MTGT and 39.6 % using FE-1 (cutoff <200 μg/g). The sensitivity and specificity of FE-1 were 63.5 % and 68.3 %, respectively. Agreement was fair (κ = 0.27). After pancreatoduodenectomy, the prevalence of PEI increased to 60 % (MTGT) and 92.2 % (FE-1), with only slight agreement between tests (κ = 0.17). Although FE-1 demonstrated high sensitivity (98.1 %), its specificity was poor (16.7 %), resulting in an 83.5 % false-positive rate.

Conclusions: In patients undergoing pancreatic surgery, especially after pancreatoduodenectomy, the agreement between MTGT and FE-1 is substantially lower than expected. FE-1 demostrates low specificity and a high false-positive rate, resulting in overdiagnosis and unnecessary economic and patient burden.

背景:诊断胰腺外分泌功能不全(PEI)的最佳检测方法仍存在争议。本研究比较了粪便弹性酶-1 (FE-1)和13C混合甘油三酯呼吸试验(MTGT)在胰腺手术患者中的诊断准确性。方法:2016-2023年在安特卫普大学医院行胰腺切除术的患者术前和术后进行FE-1和MTGT检测。以MTGT作为参考标准。使用Cohen's kappa评估两个测试之间的一致性。结果:在249例患者队列中,术前MTGT检测到PEI的比例为25.3%,FE-1检测到PEI的比例为39.6%(截止值)。结论:在接受胰腺手术的患者中,特别是胰十二指肠切除术后,MTGT和FE-1的一致性大大低于预期。FE-1特异性低,假阳性率高,导致过度诊断和不必要的经济和患者负担。
{"title":"Comparing faecal Elastase-1 and <sup>13</sup>C mixed triglyceride breath test in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery.","authors":"Vera Hartman, Bart Bracke, Thiery Chapelle, Bart Hendrikx, Frederik Huysentruyt, Ellen Liekens, Ella Roelant, Eline Roeyen, Dirk Ysebaert, Geert Roeyen","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal test for diagnosing pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) remains debated. This study compares the diagnostic accuracy of faecal elastase-1 (FE-1) and the <sup>13</sup>C Mixed Triglyceride Breath Test (MTGT) in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing pancreatic resection at Antwerp University Hospital (2016-2023) had FE-1 and MTGT testing before and after surgery. The MTGT was used as the reference standard. Agreement between both tests was evaluated using Cohen's kappa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperatively, in a patient cohort of 249 patients, PEI was detected in 25.3 % using MTGT and 39.6 % using FE-1 (cutoff <200 μg/g). The sensitivity and specificity of FE-1 were 63.5 % and 68.3 %, respectively. Agreement was fair (κ = 0.27). After pancreatoduodenectomy, the prevalence of PEI increased to 60 % (MTGT) and 92.2 % (FE-1), with only slight agreement between tests (κ = 0.17). Although FE-1 demonstrated high sensitivity (98.1 %), its specificity was poor (16.7 %), resulting in an 83.5 % false-positive rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients undergoing pancreatic surgery, especially after pancreatoduodenectomy, the agreement between MTGT and FE-1 is substantially lower than expected. FE-1 demostrates low specificity and a high false-positive rate, resulting in overdiagnosis and unnecessary economic and patient burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146046536","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: microscopic positive margin and its clinical relevance. 肝门周围胆管癌:显微阳性切缘及其临床意义。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2026-01-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.039
Giacomo Waller, Hideo Takahashi, Yuki Bekki, Rhea Raj, Salvatore Amodeo, Michael Buckstein, Maria Isabel Fiel, Marcelo E Facciuto, Myron Schwartz, Ganesh Gunasekaran

Introduction: The prognostic impact of positive bile duct margins (R1) after resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) remains unclear, and evidence on the role of adjuvant radiation (RT) is limited.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 110 patients who underwent curative-intent resection for PHC from 1997 to 2018. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors of OS and DFS.

Results: R1 margins were present in 50 patients (45.5 %). Median OS and DFS for the cohort were 47.5 and 30.2 months. OS and DFS did not differ by margin status. On multivariable analysis, lymph node metastasis independently predicted worse OS (HR 3.81; p < 0.001) and DFS (HR 3.32; p = 0.001), while larger tumor size predicted recurrence (HR 3.12; p = 0.001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS (HR 0.45; p = 0.049). Among R1 patients, adjuvant RT was associated with longer DFS (68.6 vs 17.8 months; p = 0.049) but not OS.

Conclusions: R1 resection was not associated with inferior survival in this cohort. Lymph node metastasis was the strongest prognostic factor. Adjuvant RT was associated with improved DFS in the R1 patients, supporting its use for local control and warranting prospective validation.

导论:肝门周围胆管癌(PHC)切除术后胆管边缘阳性(R1)对预后的影响尚不清楚,辅助放疗(RT)的作用证据有限。方法:我们回顾性分析了1997年至2018年110例接受治愈性PHC切除术的患者。主要结局是总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)。进行单因素和多因素分析以确定OS和DFS的危险因素。结果:50例患者(45.5%)存在R1边缘。该队列的中位OS和DFS分别为47.5和30.2个月。OS和DFS在边际状态上没有差异。在多变量分析中,淋巴结转移独立预测较差的OS (HR 3.81, p < 0.001)和DFS (HR 3.32, p = 0.001),而较大的肿瘤大小预测复发(HR 3.12, p = 0.001)。辅助化疗与OS改善相关(HR 0.45; p = 0.049)。在R1患者中,辅助放疗与更长的DFS相关(68.6个月vs 17.8个月;p = 0.049),但与OS无关。结论:在该队列中,R1切除与较差的生存率无关。淋巴结转移是最强的预后因素。辅助放疗与改善R1患者的DFS相关,支持其用于局部控制并保证前瞻性验证。
{"title":"Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: microscopic positive margin and its clinical relevance.","authors":"Giacomo Waller, Hideo Takahashi, Yuki Bekki, Rhea Raj, Salvatore Amodeo, Michael Buckstein, Maria Isabel Fiel, Marcelo E Facciuto, Myron Schwartz, Ganesh Gunasekaran","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.039","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The prognostic impact of positive bile duct margins (R1) after resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) remains unclear, and evidence on the role of adjuvant radiation (RT) is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 110 patients who underwent curative-intent resection for PHC from 1997 to 2018. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors of OS and DFS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>R1 margins were present in 50 patients (45.5 %). Median OS and DFS for the cohort were 47.5 and 30.2 months. OS and DFS did not differ by margin status. On multivariable analysis, lymph node metastasis independently predicted worse OS (HR 3.81; p < 0.001) and DFS (HR 3.32; p = 0.001), while larger tumor size predicted recurrence (HR 3.12; p = 0.001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS (HR 0.45; p = 0.049). Among R1 patients, adjuvant RT was associated with longer DFS (68.6 vs 17.8 months; p = 0.049) but not OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>R1 resection was not associated with inferior survival in this cohort. Lymph node metastasis was the strongest prognostic factor. Adjuvant RT was associated with improved DFS in the R1 patients, supporting its use for local control and warranting prospective validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146113105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Traditional clinical predictors outperform ALBI, NLR, and PLR after curative hepatic resection for HCC in a Western cohort. 在一项西方队列研究中,肝癌根治性肝切除术后的传统临床预测指标优于ALBI、NLR和PLR。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.038
Berkay Demirors, Christopher Kaltenmeier, Abiha Abdullah, Vrishketan Sethi, Charbel Elias, Frank Spitz, Jason Mial-Anthony, Timothy Fokken, Shwe Han, Sabin Subedi, Godwin Packiaraj, Marta Minervini, Michele Molinari

Background: Oncological characteristics and underlying liver function influence the outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are predictive instruments. However, for patients undergoing hepatic resection, their value remains unclear, particularly in Western populations.

Methods: ALBI, NLR and PLR were derived from blood tests obtained prior to surgery in 156 consecutive patients who underwent R0 hepatic resections between 2015 and 2020 at a Western academic center. Associations with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression models.

Results: Median age was 60 years; 72 % of patients were male, and 45 % had underlying cirrhosis. On univariate analysis, ALBI grade was associated with OS and PFS and NLR with OS, but neither retained significance in multivariate models. PLR was not predictive. Cirrhosis (HR 2.32), ECOG performance status ≥2 (HR 2.67), and AFP >100 ng/mL (HR 2.89) were independently associated with worse OS in multivariate analysis. Tumor number ≥2 and AFP >100 ng/mL were two independent predictors for PFS.

Conclusion: ALBI, NLR and PLR did not emerge as clinically relevant predictive value for OS and PFS in patients undergoing resection for HCC.

背景:肿瘤特征和潜在的肝功能影响肝细胞癌患者的预后。白蛋白-胆红素(ALBI)评分、中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率(NLR)和血小板-淋巴细胞比率(PLR)是预测工具。然而,对于接受肝切除术的患者,其价值尚不清楚,特别是在西方人群中。方法:ALBI、NLR和PLR来源于2015年至2020年间在西方学术中心接受R0肝切除术的156例连续患者手术前的血液检测。使用Kaplan-Meier方法和Cox回归模型分析与总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的关系。结果:中位年龄60岁;72%的患者为男性,45%的患者有肝硬化。在单变量分析中,ALBI分级与OS、PFS和NLR相关,但在多变量模型中均未保留显著性。PLR不具有预测性。多因素分析显示,肝硬化(HR 2.32)、ECOG功能状态≥2 (HR 2.67)、AFP水平低于100 ng/mL (HR 2.89)与OS恶化独立相关。肿瘤数≥2和AFP浓度≥100 ng/mL是PFS的两个独立预测因子。结论:ALBI、NLR和PLR并不能作为肝癌切除术患者OS和PFS的临床相关预测价值。
{"title":"Traditional clinical predictors outperform ALBI, NLR, and PLR after curative hepatic resection for HCC in a Western cohort.","authors":"Berkay Demirors, Christopher Kaltenmeier, Abiha Abdullah, Vrishketan Sethi, Charbel Elias, Frank Spitz, Jason Mial-Anthony, Timothy Fokken, Shwe Han, Sabin Subedi, Godwin Packiaraj, Marta Minervini, Michele Molinari","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oncological characteristics and underlying liver function influence the outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are predictive instruments. However, for patients undergoing hepatic resection, their value remains unclear, particularly in Western populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ALBI, NLR and PLR were derived from blood tests obtained prior to surgery in 156 consecutive patients who underwent R0 hepatic resections between 2015 and 2020 at a Western academic center. Associations with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median age was 60 years; 72 % of patients were male, and 45 % had underlying cirrhosis. On univariate analysis, ALBI grade was associated with OS and PFS and NLR with OS, but neither retained significance in multivariate models. PLR was not predictive. Cirrhosis (HR 2.32), ECOG performance status ≥2 (HR 2.67), and AFP >100 ng/mL (HR 2.89) were independently associated with worse OS in multivariate analysis. Tumor number ≥2 and AFP >100 ng/mL were two independent predictors for PFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ALBI, NLR and PLR did not emerge as clinically relevant predictive value for OS and PFS in patients undergoing resection for HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146092839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Identification of high functioning hepatocellular carcinoma transplant centers in the modern allocation system. 高功能肝癌移植中心在现代分配体系中的识别。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.037
Nina Eng, Elana Taute, Hien Dang, Sean P Martin

Introduction: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common indication for liver transplant. We set out to identify high performing HCC centers to understand their listing and donor acceptance patterns.

Methods: The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data was quired identifying patients with HCC. Centers were stratified into high functioning (HFC) and low functioning centers (LFC) based on the percentage of waitlisted patients who were transplanted and patients who died or were delisted (DDL).

Results: Multivariable analysis identified utilization of donor after circulatory death (DCD) (OR 2.25 p < 0.01) as the largest contributing factor in HFC. The current LFC transplant to DDL ratio is 1.3 whereas HFC have experiences a 1.8-fold increase from the implementation of acuity circle (AC) allocation with a transplant to DDL ratio of 9.5. Multivariable analysis suggests that this gain is related to adopting the use of DCD donor after the implantation of AC allocation (OR 4.22, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: High functioning HCC transplant center phenotype exists and appears to be most driven by the utilization of DCD donors. AC allocation has served to exacerbate disparities between HFC and LFC with the key adaptation made being the increased use of DCD donors.

肝细胞癌(HCC)是肝移植的常见适应症。我们着手确定高性能HCC中心,以了解其上市和捐赠者接受模式。方法:通过器官获取和移植网络的数据来识别HCC患者。根据等待移植的患者和死亡或被除名的患者(DDL)的百分比,将中心分为高功能中心(HFC)和低功能中心(LFC)。结果:多变量分析发现,循环死亡后供者的利用(OR 2.25 p < 0.01)是HFC的最大影响因素。目前LFC移植与DDL之比为1.3,而HFC移植与DDL之比为9.5,从实施视圆(AC)分配开始增长了1.8倍。多变量分析表明,该增益与植入AC配型后采用DCD供体有关(OR 4.22, p < 0.01)。结论:高功能HCC移植中心表型存在,并且似乎主要由DCD供体的使用驱动。AC的分配加剧了氢氟碳化合物和低碳碳化合物之间的差距,关键的适应措施是增加使用DCD捐助者。
{"title":"Identification of high functioning hepatocellular carcinoma transplant centers in the modern allocation system.","authors":"Nina Eng, Elana Taute, Hien Dang, Sean P Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.037","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common indication for liver transplant. We set out to identify high performing HCC centers to understand their listing and donor acceptance patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data was quired identifying patients with HCC. Centers were stratified into high functioning (HFC) and low functioning centers (LFC) based on the percentage of waitlisted patients who were transplanted and patients who died or were delisted (DDL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariable analysis identified utilization of donor after circulatory death (DCD) (OR 2.25 p < 0.01) as the largest contributing factor in HFC. The current LFC transplant to DDL ratio is 1.3 whereas HFC have experiences a 1.8-fold increase from the implementation of acuity circle (AC) allocation with a transplant to DDL ratio of 9.5. Multivariable analysis suggests that this gain is related to adopting the use of DCD donor after the implantation of AC allocation (OR 4.22, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High functioning HCC transplant center phenotype exists and appears to be most driven by the utilization of DCD donors. AC allocation has served to exacerbate disparities between HFC and LFC with the key adaptation made being the increased use of DCD donors.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146040513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk factors and early recurrence patterns following curative-intent resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma 远端胆管癌切除术后的危险因素和早期复发模式。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.10.006
Inhyuck Lee , Younsoo Seo , Go-Won Choi , Yoon Soo Chae , Won-Gun Yun , Youngmin Han , Hye-Sol Jung , Young Jae Cho , Wooil Kwon , Jin-Young Jang , Joon Seong Park

Background

Distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) has poor prognosis, with >50% affected patients experiencing early recurrence (ER) within 12 months after curative-intent surgery. This retrospective study analyzed ER characteristics, survival outcomes, and risk factors of DCC.

Methods

We categorized 519 patients with DCC who underwent curative-intent surgery at Seoul National University Hospital (2008–2023) into ER (n=115) and non-ER (n=404) groups. Primary endpoints were ER and overall survival (OS). We compared OS between ER and an additional non-curative reference cohort (R2/M1, n=53). Cutoffs for continuous variables were derived using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve/Youden.

Results

Median OS and recurrence-free survival were 53.6 and 52.4 months, respectively. Independent ER predictors were preoperative CA19-9 of >70 U/mL (hazard ratio [HR], 1.58), BMI of ≤21.0 kg/m² (HR, 2.04) or >25.0 kg/m² (HR 1.81), LNR of >15% (HR, 2.01), and postoperative CA19-9 of >37 U/mL (HR, 1.71). OS was similar between ER and R2/M1 groups (16.8 vs 15.6 months; p=0.998). In subgroup analyses stratified by ER status, adjuvant chemotherapy (including 5-FU), radiotherapy, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy were not associated with improved OS.

Conclusion

ER after curative-intent resection has outcomes comparable to non-curative disease, supporting risk-adapted staging and evaluation of neoadjuvant strategies for high-risk patients.
背景:远端胆管癌(DCC)预后较差,50%的患者在术后12个月内出现早期复发(ER)。本回顾性研究分析了DCC的ER特征、生存结局和危险因素。方法:我们将2008-2023年在首尔国立大学医院接受治疗目的手术的519例DCC患者分为ER组(n=115)和非ER组(n=404)。主要终点为ER和总生存期(OS)。我们比较了ER和另一个非治疗性参考队列的OS (R2/M1, n=53)。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线/约登(Youden)导出连续变量的截止点。结果:中位OS和无复发生存期分别为53.6个月和52.4个月。独立的ER预测因子为术前CA19-9为bbb70 U/mL(危险比[HR], 1.58), BMI≤21.0 kg/m²(危险比2.04)或>25.0 kg/m²(危险比1.81),LNR为>15%(危险比2.01),术后CA19-9为>37 U/mL(危险比1.71)。ER组和R2/M1组的OS相似(16.8 vs 15.6个月;p=0.998)。在按ER状态分层的亚组分析中,辅助化疗(包括5-FU)、放疗和同步放化疗与改善OS无关。结论:治疗目的切除后ER的预后与非治愈性疾病相当,支持高危患者的风险适应分期和新辅助策略的评估。
{"title":"Risk factors and early recurrence patterns following curative-intent resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma","authors":"Inhyuck Lee ,&nbsp;Younsoo Seo ,&nbsp;Go-Won Choi ,&nbsp;Yoon Soo Chae ,&nbsp;Won-Gun Yun ,&nbsp;Youngmin Han ,&nbsp;Hye-Sol Jung ,&nbsp;Young Jae Cho ,&nbsp;Wooil Kwon ,&nbsp;Jin-Young Jang ,&nbsp;Joon Seong Park","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.10.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.10.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) has poor prognosis, with &gt;50% affected patients experiencing early recurrence (ER) within 12 months after curative-intent surgery. This retrospective study analyzed ER characteristics, survival outcomes, and risk factors of DCC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We categorized 519 patients with DCC who underwent curative-intent surgery at Seoul National University Hospital (2008–2023) into ER (n=115) and non-ER (n=404) groups. Primary endpoints were ER and overall survival (OS). We compared OS between ER and an additional non-curative reference cohort (R2/M1, n=53). Cutoffs for continuous variables were derived using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve/Youden.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Median OS and recurrence-free survival were 53.6 and 52.4 months, respectively. Independent ER predictors were preoperative CA19-9 of &gt;70 U/mL (hazard ratio [HR], 1.58), BMI of ≤21.0 kg/m² (HR, 2.04) or &gt;25.0 kg/m² (HR 1.81), LNR of &gt;15% (HR, 2.01), and postoperative CA19-9 of &gt;37 U/mL (HR, 1.71). OS was similar between ER and R2/M1 groups (16.8 vs 15.6 months; p=0.998). In subgroup analyses stratified by ER status, adjuvant chemotherapy (including 5-FU), radiotherapy, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy were not associated with improved OS.</div></div><div><h3><strong>Conclusion</strong></h3><div>ER after curative-intent resection has outcomes comparable to non-curative disease, supporting risk-adapted staging and evaluation of neoadjuvant strategies for high-risk patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":"28 1","pages":"Pages 50-59"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145482078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Hpb
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1