Laboratory detection of donors implicated in transfusion-transmitted malaria.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Transfusion Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1111/trf.18061
Susan A Galel
{"title":"Laboratory detection of donors implicated in transfusion-transmitted malaria.","authors":"Susan A Galel","doi":"10.1111/trf.18061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transfusion-transmitted malaria (TTM) is rare in non-endemic areas (non-EAs) but can potentially be fatal. This review analyzes the laboratory results of donors causing TTM in non-EAs, to assess the detectability of their Plasmodium infection by molecular or antibody tests.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>TTM cases in the United States, Canada, and Europe since 2010 were identified through a literature review. Authors and laboratories were contacted for missing details about sample types and laboratory methods. Results of Plasmodium polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and antibody tests were summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve cases of TTM and one bone marrow transplant transmission were identified. Of the 13 source donors, 12 were tested by PCR, 10 were positive on at least one sample; the 2 negative donors were tested only on retained segments of blood refrigerated for several weeks. All donors were PCR positive on a fresh sample except one who was positive on a retained but not a fresh sample. These PCRs targeted Plasmodium DNA with sensitivities in the range of 1000-10,000 parasites/mL. Antibody EIA was positive in only three of seven donors tested.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review found that antibody EIAs failed to detect four of the seven TTM donors tested. DNA-based PCRs were able to detect Plasmodium infection in all donors tested except for two tested only on samples likely to have deteriorated from prolonged storage. Recently developed ribosomal RNA-based molecular donor screening assays are approximately 1000 fold more sensitive than these DNA-based PCRs, holding promise as a potential method to further reduce TTM.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transfusion-transmitted malaria (TTM) is rare in non-endemic areas (non-EAs) but can potentially be fatal. This review analyzes the laboratory results of donors causing TTM in non-EAs, to assess the detectability of their Plasmodium infection by molecular or antibody tests.

Study design and methods: TTM cases in the United States, Canada, and Europe since 2010 were identified through a literature review. Authors and laboratories were contacted for missing details about sample types and laboratory methods. Results of Plasmodium polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and antibody tests were summarized.

Results: Twelve cases of TTM and one bone marrow transplant transmission were identified. Of the 13 source donors, 12 were tested by PCR, 10 were positive on at least one sample; the 2 negative donors were tested only on retained segments of blood refrigerated for several weeks. All donors were PCR positive on a fresh sample except one who was positive on a retained but not a fresh sample. These PCRs targeted Plasmodium DNA with sensitivities in the range of 1000-10,000 parasites/mL. Antibody EIA was positive in only three of seven donors tested.

Discussion: This review found that antibody EIAs failed to detect four of the seven TTM donors tested. DNA-based PCRs were able to detect Plasmodium infection in all donors tested except for two tested only on samples likely to have deteriorated from prolonged storage. Recently developed ribosomal RNA-based molecular donor screening assays are approximately 1000 fold more sensitive than these DNA-based PCRs, holding promise as a potential method to further reduce TTM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对涉及输血传播疟疾的供体进行实验室检测。
背景:输血传播疟疾(TTM)在非疟疾流行区(Non-EAs)很少见,但有可能致命。本综述分析了在非流行区引起输血传播疟疾的供体的实验室结果,以评估通过分子或抗体测试检测其疟原虫感染的可能性:研究设计与方法:通过文献综述确定了 2010 年以来美国、加拿大和欧洲的 TTM 病例。与作者和实验室取得联系,以了解样本类型和实验室方法方面的缺失细节。总结了疟原虫聚合酶链反应(PCR)和抗体检测的结果:结果:共发现 12 例 TTM 和 1 例骨髓移植传播病例。在 13 位源捐献者中,12 位接受了 PCR 检测,10 位至少有一份样本呈阳性;2 位阴性捐献者仅接受了冷藏数周的保留血段检测。所有献血者在新鲜样本上的 PCR 检测结果均呈阳性,只有一名献血者在保留样本而非新鲜样本上的 PCR 检测结果呈阳性。这些 PCR 针对的是疟原虫 DNA,灵敏度在 1000-10,000 寄生虫/毫升之间。在接受检测的七名捐献者中,只有三人的抗体 EIA 呈阳性:讨论:本综述发现,抗体 EIA 未能检测出所检测的七名 TTM 供体中的四名。基于 DNA 的 PCR 能够检测出所有受检供体的疟原虫感染,只有两个样本除外,这两个样本可能因长期储存而变质。最近开发的基于核糖体 RNA 的分子供体筛查方法的灵敏度比基于 DNA 的 PCR 方法高出约 1000 倍,有望成为进一步减少 TTM 的潜在方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
期刊最新文献
Laboratory detection of donors implicated in transfusion-transmitted malaria. Splitting apheresis platelets as a contingency measure for inventory shortages. Longitudinal outcomes of chronically transfused adults with sickle cell disease and a history of childhood stroke. High-frequency whole blood donation and its impact on mortality: Evidence from a data linkage study in Australia. Risk of introducing Zika virus in the Canadian cord blood supply: A risk analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1