Occupational Therapy Research Publications From 2001 to 2020 in PubMed: Trends and Comparative Analysis with Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1177/15394492241292438
Heather A Shepherd, Tiago S Jesus, Emily Nalder, Armaghan Dabbagh, Heather Colquhoun
{"title":"Occupational Therapy Research Publications From 2001 to 2020 in PubMed: Trends and Comparative Analysis with Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation.","authors":"Heather A Shepherd, Tiago S Jesus, Emily Nalder, Armaghan Dabbagh, Heather Colquhoun","doi":"10.1177/15394492241292438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A limited understanding of trends in occupational therapy (OT) research publications exists. This study aimed to evaluate trends in OT research publications, in PubMed (2001-2020), compared to physiotherapy and rehabilitation. A method of secondary analysis of publication trends in the PubMed database was used. Medical subject headings for OT, physiotherapy, and rehabilitation were combined with search filters (e.g., population age, study design, and OT practice area). Linear regressions were computed to analyze changes in yearly growth. OT research publications increased by 5.86 per year and comprised less than 2.5% of rehabilitation research publications yearly. Knowledge synthesis was the predominant OT study design (2.94% yearly increase; <i>p</i> < .001). Intellectual/cognitive conditions and emergent practice areas in OT research publications increased over time (both <i>p</i> = .007). OT research publications were relatively evenly distributed across population age. OT research publications are increasing over time but lag relative to physiotherapy and rehabilitation broadly. Our findings may inform future OT research priorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47195,"journal":{"name":"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health","volume":" ","pages":"15394492241292438"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492241292438","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A limited understanding of trends in occupational therapy (OT) research publications exists. This study aimed to evaluate trends in OT research publications, in PubMed (2001-2020), compared to physiotherapy and rehabilitation. A method of secondary analysis of publication trends in the PubMed database was used. Medical subject headings for OT, physiotherapy, and rehabilitation were combined with search filters (e.g., population age, study design, and OT practice area). Linear regressions were computed to analyze changes in yearly growth. OT research publications increased by 5.86 per year and comprised less than 2.5% of rehabilitation research publications yearly. Knowledge synthesis was the predominant OT study design (2.94% yearly increase; p < .001). Intellectual/cognitive conditions and emergent practice areas in OT research publications increased over time (both p = .007). OT research publications were relatively evenly distributed across population age. OT research publications are increasing over time but lag relative to physiotherapy and rehabilitation broadly. Our findings may inform future OT research priorities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2001 年至 2020 年在 PubMed 上发表的职业疗法研究论文:趋势及与物理治疗和康复的比较分析。
人们对职业疗法(OT)研究出版物的发展趋势了解有限。本研究旨在评估 PubMed(2001-2020 年)中职业疗法研究出版物的趋势,并将其与物理治疗和康复进行比较。本研究采用了对 PubMed 数据库中的出版物趋势进行二次分析的方法。通过搜索过滤器(如人口年龄、研究设计和 OT 实践领域)将 OT、物理治疗和康复的医学主题词结合起来。通过线性回归分析每年的增长变化。康复治疗研究出版物的年增长率为 5.86%,而康复治疗研究出版物的年增长率不到 2.5%。知识综合是最主要的康复治疗研究设计(年增长率为 2.94%;p < .001)。随着时间的推移,康复治疗研究出版物中的智力/认知条件和新兴实践领域也在增加(均为 p = .007)。在不同年龄段的人群中,定向行走研究出版物的分布相对均匀。随着时间的推移,康复理疗研究出版物在不断增加,但与物理治疗和康复理疗研究出版物相比,康复理疗研究出版物的数量相对较少。我们的研究结果可为未来的职业技术研究重点提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The aim of OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health is to advance knowledge and science in occupational therapy and related fields, nationally and internationally, through the publication of scholarly literature and research. The journal publishes research that advances the understanding of occupation as it relates to participation and health.
期刊最新文献
Parenting With and Beyond Cancer: A Photo-Elicitation Study. A Mixed-Methods Examination of Lost Occupational Choice in Retirement. Performance Analysis of Driving Ability (P-Drive): Investigating Construct Validity and Concordance of Australasian Data. Practitioner Perspectives on Occupation-Based Practice Across Varied Settings. Occupational Therapy Practitioners' Perceptions of Providing Services for the Acute Postpartum Population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1