Participation as Co-Occupation Between Parents and Adult Children With Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1177/15394492241292267
Katie Dahlerbruch, Christine Helfrich, Simone V Gill
{"title":"Participation as Co-Occupation Between Parents and Adult Children With Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities.","authors":"Katie Dahlerbruch, Christine Helfrich, Simone V Gill","doi":"10.1177/15394492241292267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) require high levels of assistance to participate in occupations. Otherwise, they experience low occupational engagement. This study aimed to explore how parents describe participation in occupations for their adult children with PIMD. Semi-structured interviews (<i>n</i> = 9) were conducted to understand how parents described their adult children's participation in occupations. Data were analyzed using the theory of co-occupation to identify themes and triangulate findings with the literature. Parents described participation as co-occupation in \"essential\" versus \"non-essential\" occupations. Participation in essential co-occupations emphasized shared physicality, while non-essential co-occupations focused on joint meaning (shared intentionality) and emotional responses (shared emotionality). Findings illustrate a way to conceptualize participation in essential versus non-essential co-occupations for adults with PIMD, highlight the importance of recognizing and illuminating subjective experiences of adults with PIMD, and provide a foundation for occupational therapists to increase occupational engagement within this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":47195,"journal":{"name":"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health","volume":" ","pages":"15394492241292267"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492241292267","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) require high levels of assistance to participate in occupations. Otherwise, they experience low occupational engagement. This study aimed to explore how parents describe participation in occupations for their adult children with PIMD. Semi-structured interviews (n = 9) were conducted to understand how parents described their adult children's participation in occupations. Data were analyzed using the theory of co-occupation to identify themes and triangulate findings with the literature. Parents described participation as co-occupation in "essential" versus "non-essential" occupations. Participation in essential co-occupations emphasized shared physicality, while non-essential co-occupations focused on joint meaning (shared intentionality) and emotional responses (shared emotionality). Findings illustrate a way to conceptualize participation in essential versus non-essential co-occupations for adults with PIMD, highlight the importance of recognizing and illuminating subjective experiences of adults with PIMD, and provide a foundation for occupational therapists to increase occupational engagement within this population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与是父母与患有严重智障和多重残疾的成年子女之间的共同事务。
深度智障和多重残疾(PIMD)成年人需要高度的协助才能参与职业活动。否则,他们的职业参与度会很低。本研究旨在探讨父母如何描述其患有深度智障和多重残疾的成年子女的职业参与情况。研究人员进行了半结构式访谈(n = 9),以了解父母如何描述其成年子女的职业参与情况。我们使用共同职业理论对数据进行了分析,以确定主题并将研究结果与文献进行三角验证。父母将参与描述为 "基本 "与 "非基本 "职业的共同占有。参与重要的共同职业强调共同的身体性,而非重要的共同职业则侧重于共同的意义(共同的意向性)和情感反应(共同的情感性)。研究结果表明了一种概念化患有多发性肌营养不良症的成年人参与基本与非基本共同职业的方法,强调了认识和阐明患有多发性肌营养不良症的成年人的主观体验的重要性,并为职业治疗师提高该人群的职业参与度奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The aim of OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health is to advance knowledge and science in occupational therapy and related fields, nationally and internationally, through the publication of scholarly literature and research. The journal publishes research that advances the understanding of occupation as it relates to participation and health.
期刊最新文献
Parenting With and Beyond Cancer: A Photo-Elicitation Study. A Mixed-Methods Examination of Lost Occupational Choice in Retirement. Performance Analysis of Driving Ability (P-Drive): Investigating Construct Validity and Concordance of Australasian Data. Practitioner Perspectives on Occupation-Based Practice Across Varied Settings. Occupational Therapy Practitioners' Perceptions of Providing Services for the Acute Postpartum Population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1