Artificial intelligence versus conventional methods for RGP lens fitting in keratoconus.

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Contact Lens & Anterior Eye Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1016/j.clae.2024.102321
Jérémy Abadou, Simon Dahan, Juliette Knoeri, Loic Leveziel, Nacim Bouheraoua, Vincent M Borderie
{"title":"Artificial intelligence versus conventional methods for RGP lens fitting in keratoconus.","authors":"Jérémy Abadou, Simon Dahan, Juliette Knoeri, Loic Leveziel, Nacim Bouheraoua, Vincent M Borderie","doi":"10.1016/j.clae.2024.102321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare the efficiency of three artificial intelligence (AI) frameworks (Standard Machine Learning (ML), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) and Convolution Neural Networks (CNN)) with a reference method (Mean radius of curvature (K)) to predict the posterior radius of curvature of the best-fitted rigid contact lens (RCBFL) in keratoconus eyes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 197 keratoconus eyes of 135 patients fitted with Rose K2® (Menicon®, Nagoya, Japan) rigid contact lenses with one or more topographies available (MS39®, CSO®, Ferrara, Italy) between January 2020 and September 2022. Two types of topographic data (indices and reconstructed maps from raw data) were used for AI analysis. Three distinct approaches were utilized for leveraging AI: Standard ML methods and MLPs based on topographic indices and CNNs based on topographic maps (i.e., corneal thickness, sagittal, and tangential maps). Seventeen AI framework's accuracies were compared with the r<sup>2</sup> determination coefficient of linear regression between predicted and best-fitted radii. Framework accuracies were compared with the Fisher z-transformation of Pearson correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In multiple linear regression, only three topographic indices (i.e., 3- & 5-mm mean K and Kmax) were significantly associated with RCBFL (p ≤ 0.0001). Compared with the reference method (mean-K; r<sup>2</sup> = 0.36), a significantly better RCBFL prediction was achieved with Random Forest using the three topographic indices, MLP using all indices, ResNet18 CNN using anterior topographic maps and CNNs using combined parameters (0.69 ≤ r<sup>2</sup> ≤ 0.80; p < 0.05). The best accuracy was obtained with the EfficientNetB0 CNN trained with three maps (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.80).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Artificial intelligence methods, particularly CNNs, with corneal topography data of MS39® topographer, have demonstrated superiority over conventional approaches in predicting the posterior curvature radius of Rose K2® rigid contact lenses in patients with keratoconus.</p>","PeriodicalId":49087,"journal":{"name":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","volume":" ","pages":"102321"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2024.102321","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To compare the efficiency of three artificial intelligence (AI) frameworks (Standard Machine Learning (ML), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) and Convolution Neural Networks (CNN)) with a reference method (Mean radius of curvature (K)) to predict the posterior radius of curvature of the best-fitted rigid contact lens (RCBFL) in keratoconus eyes.

Methods: This retrospective study included 197 keratoconus eyes of 135 patients fitted with Rose K2® (Menicon®, Nagoya, Japan) rigid contact lenses with one or more topographies available (MS39®, CSO®, Ferrara, Italy) between January 2020 and September 2022. Two types of topographic data (indices and reconstructed maps from raw data) were used for AI analysis. Three distinct approaches were utilized for leveraging AI: Standard ML methods and MLPs based on topographic indices and CNNs based on topographic maps (i.e., corneal thickness, sagittal, and tangential maps). Seventeen AI framework's accuracies were compared with the r2 determination coefficient of linear regression between predicted and best-fitted radii. Framework accuracies were compared with the Fisher z-transformation of Pearson correlation coefficients.

Results: In multiple linear regression, only three topographic indices (i.e., 3- & 5-mm mean K and Kmax) were significantly associated with RCBFL (p ≤ 0.0001). Compared with the reference method (mean-K; r2 = 0.36), a significantly better RCBFL prediction was achieved with Random Forest using the three topographic indices, MLP using all indices, ResNet18 CNN using anterior topographic maps and CNNs using combined parameters (0.69 ≤ r2 ≤ 0.80; p < 0.05). The best accuracy was obtained with the EfficientNetB0 CNN trained with three maps (r2 = 0.80).

Conclusions: Artificial intelligence methods, particularly CNNs, with corneal topography data of MS39® topographer, have demonstrated superiority over conventional approaches in predicting the posterior curvature radius of Rose K2® rigid contact lenses in patients with keratoconus.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能与传统角膜塑形镜验配方法的比较
背景:比较三种人工智能(AI)框架(标准机器学习(ML)、多层感知器(MLP)和卷积神经网络(CNN))与一种参考方法(平均曲率半径(K))预测角膜塑形镜最佳配戴硬性隐形眼镜(RCBFL)后曲率半径的效率:这项回顾性研究纳入了在 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 9 月期间配戴了 Rose K2® (Menicon®,日本名古屋)硬性隐形眼镜的 135 名患者的 197 只角膜炎眼,这些患者配戴了一种或多种地形图(MS39®,CSO®,意大利费拉拉)。人工智能分析使用了两种地形图数据(指数和从原始数据重建的地图)。人工智能利用了三种不同的方法:基于地形指数的标准 ML 方法和 MLP,以及基于地形图(即角膜厚度图、矢状图和切线图)的 CNN。将 17 个人工智能框架的准确度与预测半径和最佳拟合半径之间线性回归的 r2 决定系数进行了比较。将框架的准确度与皮尔逊相关系数的费舍尔 z 变形进行了比较:在多元线性回归中,只有三个地形指数(即 3 和 5 mm 平均 K 值和 Kmax)与 RCBFL 显著相关(p ≤ 0.0001)。与参考方法(平均 K;r2 = 0.36)相比,使用三种地形指数的随机森林、使用所有指数的 MLP、使用前部地形图的 ResNet18 CNN 和使用组合参数的 CNNs 预测 RCBFL 的效果明显更好(0.69 ≤ r2 ≤ 0.80;p 2 = 0.80):人工智能方法,尤其是使用 MS39® 角膜地形图数据的 CNN,在预测 Rose K2® 硬性角膜接触镜在角膜炎患者中的后曲率半径方面优于传统方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
198
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Contact Lens & Anterior Eye is a research-based journal covering all aspects of contact lens theory and practice, including original articles on invention and innovations, as well as the regular features of: Case Reports; Literary Reviews; Editorials; Instrumentation and Techniques and Dates of Professional Meetings.
期刊最新文献
Validation and repeatability assessment of the Chinese version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), 5-item dry eye (DEQ-5), and contact lens dry eye questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8) questionnaires. Artificial intelligence-assisted fitting method using corneal topography outcomes enhances success rate in orthokeratology lens fitting. Randomised controlled trial on effects of topical insulin compared to artificial tears and normal saline on tear inflammatory mediator levels and clinical parameters in diabetics with dry eye disease. Development and evaluation of ocular antibiotic-loaded soluble film inserts. Digital eye strain and clinical correlates in older adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1