On the nature, predictors, and outcomes of work passion profiles: A generalisability study across distinct types of employees.

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Stress and Health Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1002/smi.3495
Nicolas Gillet, Alexandre J S Morin, Stéphanie Brault, Margaux Becker, Iria Verbeke
{"title":"On the nature, predictors, and outcomes of work passion profiles: A generalisability study across distinct types of employees.","authors":"Nicolas Gillet, Alexandre J S Morin, Stéphanie Brault, Margaux Becker, Iria Verbeke","doi":"10.1002/smi.3495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thus far, little research has adopted a person-centred approach to investigate the nature of work passion profiles. As a result, our understanding of the most commonly occurring combinations of harmonious passion (HP) and obsessive passion (OP) in the workplace remains limited. To achieve a more refined understanding of the nature of these work passion profiles, our first aim was thus to identify the configurations of HP and OP for work observed among five samples, including 11 subsamples, of employees (N = 7258). Then, we also considered the extent to which these profiles and their associations with theoretically-relevant predictors (work-home segmentation and organisational support) and outcomes (work engagement, work-family conflict, turnover intentions, presenteeism, and counterproductive work behaviours) generalised across all subsamples. We identified a total of five profiles with a structure that differed slightly across samples: High OP Dominant, High HP Dominant, Average HP Dominant, Low HP Dominant (i.e., low levels of passion dominated by higher levels of HP relative to OP), and Moderately Low Passion. The High OP Dominant profile was systematically the most prevalent (37.5%-54.1% of the sample), whereas the High HP Dominant was the least prevalent (2.1%-7.7%). Across all samples, work-home segmentation was related to a higher likelihood of membership into the profiles characterised by higher, relative to lower or moderate, levels of passion (HP and OP), whereas organisational support also helped employees to stay away from the High OP Dominant profile. Lastly, the least desirable outcomes were observed in the High OP Dominant profile, whereas the most desirable outcomes were observed in the High HP Dominant profile. Interestingly, work engagement levels where comparable in these two profiles. Beyond their theoretical implications for research on work passion, these results highlight how work passion has highly similar implications across contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":51175,"journal":{"name":"Stress and Health","volume":" ","pages":"e3495"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11636451/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3495","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thus far, little research has adopted a person-centred approach to investigate the nature of work passion profiles. As a result, our understanding of the most commonly occurring combinations of harmonious passion (HP) and obsessive passion (OP) in the workplace remains limited. To achieve a more refined understanding of the nature of these work passion profiles, our first aim was thus to identify the configurations of HP and OP for work observed among five samples, including 11 subsamples, of employees (N = 7258). Then, we also considered the extent to which these profiles and their associations with theoretically-relevant predictors (work-home segmentation and organisational support) and outcomes (work engagement, work-family conflict, turnover intentions, presenteeism, and counterproductive work behaviours) generalised across all subsamples. We identified a total of five profiles with a structure that differed slightly across samples: High OP Dominant, High HP Dominant, Average HP Dominant, Low HP Dominant (i.e., low levels of passion dominated by higher levels of HP relative to OP), and Moderately Low Passion. The High OP Dominant profile was systematically the most prevalent (37.5%-54.1% of the sample), whereas the High HP Dominant was the least prevalent (2.1%-7.7%). Across all samples, work-home segmentation was related to a higher likelihood of membership into the profiles characterised by higher, relative to lower or moderate, levels of passion (HP and OP), whereas organisational support also helped employees to stay away from the High OP Dominant profile. Lastly, the least desirable outcomes were observed in the High OP Dominant profile, whereas the most desirable outcomes were observed in the High HP Dominant profile. Interestingly, work engagement levels where comparable in these two profiles. Beyond their theoretical implications for research on work passion, these results highlight how work passion has highly similar implications across contexts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于工作激情特征的性质、预测因素和结果:一项针对不同类型员工的通用性研究。
迄今为止,很少有研究采用以人为本的方法来调查工作激情特征的性质。因此,我们对工作场所中最常见的和谐激情(HP)和强迫激情(OP)组合的了解仍然有限。为了更深入地了解这些工作激情特征的性质,我们的首要目标是确定在五个样本(包括 11 个子样本)中观察到的员工工作激情(HP)和强迫激情(OP)的配置(N = 7258)。然后,我们还考虑了这些特征及其与理论上相关的预测因素(工作-家庭分割和组织支持)和结果(工作投入、工作-家庭冲突、离职意向、旷工和消极工作行为)之间的关联在所有子样本中的普遍程度。我们共发现了五种特征,其结构在不同样本中略有不同:高 OP 主导型、高 HP 主导型、平均 HP 主导型、低 HP 主导型(即相对于 OP 而言,低水平的激情由较高水平的 HP 主导)和中低激情。高 OP 支配型是最普遍的(占样本的 37.5%-54.1%),而高 HP 支配型则最少(2.1%-7.7%)。在所有样本中,工作-家庭分工与员工更有可能加入激情水平较高(相对于较低或中等水平)的类型(HP 和 OP)有关,而组织支持也有助于员工远离高 OP 主导型类型。最后,最不理想的结果出现在高 OP 主导型特征中,而最理想的结果出现在高 HP 主导型特征中。有趣的是,这两种性格特征的工作投入程度相当。除了对工作激情研究的理论意义之外,这些结果还强调了工作激情在不同情境下具有高度相似的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Stress and Health
Stress and Health 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Stress is a normal component of life and a number of mechanisms exist to cope with its effects. The stresses that challenge man"s existence in our modern society may result in failure of these coping mechanisms, with resultant stress-induced illness. The aim of the journal therefore is to provide a forum for discussion of all aspects of stress which affect the individual in both health and disease. The Journal explores the subject from as many aspects as possible, so that when stress becomes a consideration, health information can be presented as to the best ways by which to minimise its effects.
期刊最新文献
Destructive Self-Leadership? Self-Leadership, Maladaptive Coping, and Stress in College Students. Global Research on Cyberchondria: Scientometric and Visual Analysis From 2003 to 2022. Psychological Distress, Resources, and Coping Strategies Among Evacuees and Non-Evacuees From an Armed Conflict Zone: A Network Analysis. Reflective Abstract Processing Reduces Negative Emotions Independent of Self-Perspective. The Impact of Physical Activity on the Disability-Related Stress of Individuals With Physical Disabilities: A Five-Year Longitudinal Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1